Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Cancer Patients Undergoing ERCP

NCT ID: NCT06409104

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2024-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine during ERCP regarding hemodynamic, respiratory, sedative and cognitive functions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary pathologies, and its use has increased in recent years. The procedure lasts from 30 to 60 position. Patients usually cannot tolerate the procedure because of pain, uncomfortable position, fear, and nausea without adequate sedation; therefore, ERCP is generally performed under moderate to deep sedation or even GA. ERCP under general anesthesia has several limitations. The procedure is often prolonged due to extra time required for patient preparation, induction of anesthesia, tracheal intubation, and recovery. In addition, the cost per procedure is higher. Deep sedation, on the other hand, is an alternative that is used by specific centers under anesthesiologist supervision instead of general anesthesia. Deep sedation has the advantage of offering the extra time required for general anesthesia and better procedure conditions in relation to conscious sedation.

Propofol is a popular drug that is frequently used in day surgery because of its early onset activity, short duration of action, and the fact that the patient regains normal mental functions only minutes after intravenous application. However, an increased dose of propofol may cause undesirable side effects such as hypoxia which is a common occurrence during upper GI endoscopy under sedation with propofol prolonged hypoxia is the most common cause of cardiac arrhythmia and coronary ischemia .Also, propofol lacks adequate analgesic effects to inhibit visceral traction, pain other side effects of propofol include hypotension and apnea.

In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been used as an alternative to Propofol in conscious sedation applications. Because it provides sedation and analgesia but does not cause respiratory depression, dexmedetomidine is considered a suitable drug for operations that are performed under local anesthesia.

According to authors best knowledge, there are no enough studies comparing both drugs in patients undergoing ERCP

Aim of the work The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine during ERCP regarding hemodynamic, respiratory, sedative and cognitive functions.

Objectives:

* To compare the hemodynamic profile of dexmedetomidine and Propofol during sedation in patients undergoing ERCP.
* To study both agents effect on respiratory complications.
* To demonstrate the effect of both drugs on cognitive functions.
* To assess the effect of both drugs on the duration of the procedure and the number of interruptions.

Hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine will provide better sedation and analgesia with fewer side effects when compared to propofol in patients undergoing ERCP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sedation in ERCP

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* To compare hemodynamic profile of dexmedetomidine and Propfol during sedation in patients undergoing ERCP.
* To study both agents effect on respiratory complications.
* To demonstrate the effect of both drugs on cognitive functions.
* To assess the effect of both drugs on duration of procedure and number of interruptions.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The patients will be randomly assigned into two equal comparable groups using computer- generated random numbers in opaque closed envelopes, each of which will include 101 patients. Randomization will be done by statistician and each group of the patient will revealed only when the included patient is transferred to preanesthetic room.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol

will receive 1-2 mgkg-1 propofol injection over 30s followed by of propofol a 0.05 to 0.1 mg /kg/min infusion .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

will receive 1-2 mgkg-1 propofol injection over 30s followed by of propofol a 0.05 to 0.1 mg /kg/min infusion

Dexmedetomidine

will receive dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 1 μg/kg over 10 min, followed by a 0.2-0.7-μg/kg/h infusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

will receive dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 1 μg/kg over 10 min, followed by a 0.2-0.7-μg/kg/h infusion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

will receive 1-2 mgkg-1 propofol injection over 30s followed by of propofol a 0.05 to 0.1 mg /kg/min infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

will receive dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 1 μg/kg over 10 min, followed by a 0.2-0.7-μg/kg/h infusion.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age starting from 21 to 60 years.
* Genders eligible for study: males and females
* ASA II-III
* Undergoing ERCP
* 18.5 to 30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Known allergy to drugs used in the study.
* Use of any anti-coagulants
* Neurological disorders
* Advanced liver or kidney disease
* Patient with psychiatric disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ahmed Mohamed Soliman

Giza, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-211-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolame
NCT06315634 COMPLETED PHASE4
Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in NORA
NCT06403670 COMPLETED PHASE4