The Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine VS Propofol During Peribulbar Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06369103

Last Updated: 2024-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the work to compare the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol during peribulbar anesthesia in patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery on hemodynamic, respiratory parameters, recovery profile, analgesic effects, post-operative cognitive function, patients satisfaction and adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In ocular surgery, local anesthesia or regional anesthesia is generally preferred over general anesthesia because of quicker patient rehabilitation and the avoidance of possible complications from general anesthesia. However, even with these anesthesia techniques, pain, fear and anxiety are major predictors of lower patient satisfaction.

Vitrectomy surgery is one of the most common outpatient ophthalmic surgeries. It can be performed with peribulbar anesthesia and intravenous (IV) sedation support, allowing the procedure to be completed in most patients without the need for general anesthesia. Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure; therefore, sedation is applied to reduce patient agitation, ensuring both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used.

Intravenous sedation is frequently used during ophthalmic regional anesthesia. There is no 'ideal' drug for sedation or analgesia. Various drugs either alone or in combination have been used with different methods of administration. The preferred sedative agent for ophthalmic surgeries performed under local anesthesia should have rapid onset but a short duration of action to ensure rapid recovery. It should be non-accumulating, non-toxic and have a favorable therapeutic index with minimal side effects. Unfortunately no drug is presently available that fulfils all these criteria. The available sedative drugs are benzodiazepines, intravenous anaesthetic induction agents (e.g. propofol), opiates and α-adrenoreceptor agonists such as dexmedetomidine or clonidine.

Among anesthetic agents, Dexmedetomidine is a strong selective α2-adrenergic agonist with sympatholytic, anxiolytic, analgesic and dose-dependent sedative/hypnotic properties, without causing respiratory depression.

Moreover, the use of dexmedetomidine reduces anesthetic and opioid requirements and also psychomotor function to be reserved.

Dexmedetomidine is the preferred agent for sedation in retinal surgery because of its ability to maintain hemodynamic and respiratory stability.

On the other hand, Propofol is an important intravenous anesthetic agent that has been extensively used as a sedative agent for ophthalmic procedures due to its favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Propofol has short duration of action, no cumulative effect, unique recovery profile as well as rapid emergence and anti-emetic properties. Respiratory depression and reduced blood pressure are major side effects of propofol. However, it has been suggested that propofol may still be safely administered if given at a lower dose. Other side effects of propofol include pain on injection, increased oculocardiac reflex, anaphylaxis and patient movement.

Despite many benefits, propofol sedation has been involved in producing the photic sneezing reflex induced by periocular injections of anesthetics.

Unexpected or sudden sneezing during injection can be a dangerous side effect in periocular injection, in which abrupt head movement may cause globe injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Satisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexmedetomidine Group

Patients will receive dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5-1.0 mcg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance infusion rate of 0.2-0.5 mcg/kg/min when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5-1.0 mcg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance infusion rate of 0.2-0.5 mcg/kg/min when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Propofol Group

Patients will receive propofol at a dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance Infusion rate of 0.5-2 mg/kg/hr when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive propofol at a dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance Infusion rate of 0.5-2 mg/kg/hr when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Patients will receive dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5-1.0 mcg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance infusion rate of 0.2-0.5 mcg/kg/min when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Patients will receive propofol at a dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg over 5-10 minutes, then a maintenance Infusion rate of 0.5-2 mg/kg/hr when the bispectral index (BIS) value is between 70 and 80.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 20-70 years.
* Expected time of surgery less than 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with an initial mini mental state examination (MMSE) score less than 23
* Patients refusing LA
* Clotting abnormalities
* Impaired mental status
* Allergy to any of the study medications
* Also, patients were excluded if they had severe cardiac disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, a history of sleep apnea and those who received general anesthesia.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beni-Suef University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dina Mahmoud Fakhry

Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dina M Fakhry, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beni-Suef University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beni Suef University Hospital

Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dina M Fakhry, MD

Role: CONTACT

+201289998680

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dina M Fakhry, MD

Role: primary

0201289998680

Dina M Fakhry, MD

Role: backup

+201289998680

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMBSUREC/03032024/Fakhry

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.