Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-01
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After induction of general anesthesia, all patients received peribulbar block. In group A (midazolam group), 25 patients received midazolam. In group B (dexmedetomidine group), 25 patients received dexmedetomidine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Subtenon and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Effect on Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT04668456
Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine & Neostigmine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic Mixture in Peribulbar Block in Vitreoretinal Surgeries
NCT06501352
Dexmedetomidine in Topical Versus Peribulbar Anesthesia for Cataract Surgery
NCT05692167
Dexmedetomidine vs. Propofol for Cataract Surgery
NCT00786370
Dexmedetomidine and Pregabalin for Conscious Sedation During Cataract Surgery
NCT03735368
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and midazolam as adjuvants to local anesthetic in peribulbar blocks for cataract surgery.
Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 50 patients aged 18-75 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for cataract surgery under peribulbar block. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups: Group A received midazolam (1 mg), and Group B received dexmedetomidine (50 µg), combined with a standard mixture of local anesthetics. The primary outcomes included the onset and duration of motor and sensory block and lid akinesia. Secondary outcomes assessed the quality of motor and sensory block, lid akinesia using the Ocular Anesthesia Scoring System, sedation levels using the Ramsay Sedation Score, the occurrence of local or systemic complications, and satisfaction levels reported by both patients and surgeons.
Keywords: dexmedetomidine; midazolam; peribulbar block; cataract surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
peribulbar block 1
Patients who were scheduled for cataract surgery under peribulbar block.
Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for peribulbar block
Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine, lidocaine, and hyaluronidase) for peribulbar block during cataract surgery
peribulbar block 2
Patients who were scheduled for cataract surgery under peribulbar block.
Midazolam as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for peribulbar block
Midazolam as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine, lidocaine, and hyaluronidase) for peribulbar block during cataract surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for peribulbar block
Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine, lidocaine, and hyaluronidase) for peribulbar block during cataract surgery
Midazolam as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for peribulbar block
Midazolam as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine, lidocaine, and hyaluronidase) for peribulbar block during cataract surgery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for cataract surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II.
Exclusion Criteria
* Had impaired mental status
* Had coagulation abnormalities
* Had severe cardiac disease
* Had chronic obstructive lung disease
* Had a history of sleep apnea
* Refused to participate.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Suez Canal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdelrhman Alshawadfy
assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abdelrhman Alshawadfy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Suez Canal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Suez canal university
Ismailia, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
peribulbar block
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.