Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT04753515
Last Updated: 2022-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-05
2021-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sedation Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil to Fibreoptic Intubation
NCT01474213
Comparison of Remifentanil with a Combination of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Awake Tracheal Intubation
NCT06581731
Pharmacodynamic Interactions of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine on Intravenous Anesthesia
NCT02777619
Application of Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride Injection in Anesthesia for Patients Without Tracheal Intubation
NCT04652427
Sedation by Dexmedetomidine and Propofol
NCT02993718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group DMR
dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
Group PMR
propofol combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
propofol combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.33 mg/kg propoful over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
propofol combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.33 mg/kg propoful over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with oral tracheal intubation;
3. The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grade is I or II, and the cardiac function is 1-2;
4. Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m2.
Exclusion Criteria
2. body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or \<18 kg/m2;
3. Patients with poor blood pressure control (receive regular antihypertensive medical treatment but still have systolic blood pressure \> 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg);
4. Patients with a higher risk of reflux and aspiration, such as full stomach, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastroparesis, and pregnant women;
5. Patients have schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, intellectual disability, hearing impairment.;
6. Patients who take sedative and analgesic drugs for a long time;
7. Patients who are allergic to propofol, dexmedetomidine, midazolam or remifentanil
8. Patients who are expected to be difficult to intubate;
9. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials, or who refuse to sign informed consent.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
SanQing Jin
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SanQing Jin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.
Zhou LJ, Fang XZ, Gao J, Zhangm Y, Tao LJ. Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Performing Awake Intubation: A Meta-analysis. Am J Ther. 2016 Nov/Dec;23(6):e1788-e1800. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000319.
Cattano D, Lam NC, Ferrario L, Seitan C, Vahdat K, Wilcox DW, Hagberg CA. Dexmedetomidine versus Remifentanil for Sedation during Awake Fiberoptic Intubation. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:753107. doi: 10.1155/2012/753107. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
Xu T, Li M, Ni C, Guo XY. Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 2;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0219-9.
Johnston KD, Rai MR. Conscious sedation for awake fibreoptic intubation: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;60(6):584-99. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9915-9. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
Park S, Choi SL, Nahm FS, Ryu JH, Do SH. Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22712. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022712.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E2020154
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.