Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
NCT ID: NCT03521505
Last Updated: 2021-09-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-11
2020-01-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnosis of Endobronchial US-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
NCT05781035
A Comparison of Sedative Drugs for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
NCT02157818
Dexmedetomidine for Sedation Undergoing Bronchoscopy
NCT04169685
Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation for Endobronchial Ultrasound
NCT02713191
Sedation During Bronchoscopy:Dexmedetomidine vs Alfentanil
NCT01805726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate the safety and feasibility of Dexmedetomidine for sedation of EBUS-TBNA comparing to Propofol for sedation of EBUS-TBNA. Generally, the FB sedation can divided into three parts: the induction (from starting sedative administration to insertion of bronchoscope); the maintenance ( from insertion of bronchoscope to its removal) and the recovery (from bronchoscope removal to patients gain consciousness). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with hypoxemia during maintenance of sedation. the investigators will also observe the other sedative outcomes, e.g. blood pressure, sedative drug dosing and patient tolerance and cooperation. The present study will also observe the association between brain perfusion and sedative outcomes via non-invasive monitor. Based on the unique pharmacokinetic property of Dexmedetomidine and the real-time brain perfusion monitor, Dexmedetomidine-based sedation may provide better safety profile for EBUS-TBNA than propofol and discover novel connection between sedative outcomes and brain perfusion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine arm
Dexmedetomidine will be administrated for sedation of EBUS-TBNA
Dexmedetomidine arm
Induction: Dexmedetomidine 1ug/kg infusion for 10 minutes. 5 mg/kg alfentanil (1:10 dilution) slow injection 2 min before complete Dexmedetomidine induction Maintenance: Dexmedetomidine 0.5\~1.4ug/kg/hour infusion±0.2ug/kg/hour to maintain stable vital signs and The Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale (OAA/S) 3\~2. the infusion rate was increased by 0.2ug/kg/hour if the patient persistently had eye opening, talked, or became irritable and interfered with the procedure. The infusion rate was reduced by 0.2ug/kg/hour, if the following adverse events occurred: hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 90%) or hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg) in any duration
Propofol arm
Propofol will be administrated for sedation of EBUS-TBNA
Propofol arm
5 mg/kg alfentanil (1:10 dilution) slow injection 2 min before induction Induction: The initial effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol was targeted to 2.0 μg/ml for induction (Schneider model of target-controlled infusion (TCI), Injectomat total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) Agilia, Fresenius Kabi, France). If OAA/S did not reach 3 while Ce achieved 2.0 μg/ml, Ce was increased by 0.2 μg/ml every 90 seconds until OAA/S 3\~2.
Maintenance: the Ce was increased by 2.0 μg/mL every 90 seconds if the patient persistently had eye opening, talked, or became irritable and interfered with the procedure. The Ce was reduced by 0.2 μg/ml every 90 seconds, if the following adverse events occurred: hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 90%) or hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg) in any duration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine arm
Induction: Dexmedetomidine 1ug/kg infusion for 10 minutes. 5 mg/kg alfentanil (1:10 dilution) slow injection 2 min before complete Dexmedetomidine induction Maintenance: Dexmedetomidine 0.5\~1.4ug/kg/hour infusion±0.2ug/kg/hour to maintain stable vital signs and The Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale (OAA/S) 3\~2. the infusion rate was increased by 0.2ug/kg/hour if the patient persistently had eye opening, talked, or became irritable and interfered with the procedure. The infusion rate was reduced by 0.2ug/kg/hour, if the following adverse events occurred: hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 90%) or hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg) in any duration
Propofol arm
5 mg/kg alfentanil (1:10 dilution) slow injection 2 min before induction Induction: The initial effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol was targeted to 2.0 μg/ml for induction (Schneider model of target-controlled infusion (TCI), Injectomat total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) Agilia, Fresenius Kabi, France). If OAA/S did not reach 3 while Ce achieved 2.0 μg/ml, Ce was increased by 0.2 μg/ml every 90 seconds until OAA/S 3\~2.
Maintenance: the Ce was increased by 2.0 μg/mL every 90 seconds if the patient persistently had eye opening, talked, or became irritable and interfered with the procedure. The Ce was reduced by 0.2 μg/ml every 90 seconds, if the following adverse events occurred: hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 90%) or hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 mmHg, or systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg) in any duration.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification IV or V
* Mallampati score of 4
* Severe sleep apnoea syndrome (apnoea-hypopnea index more than 40)
* Body mass index more than 42 in males or 35 in females
* Neurologic disorders or other conditions contributing to difficulty in assessing response
* Forced expiratory vital capacity (FVC) less than 15 ml/kg body weight, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) less than 1000 ml, or FEV1/FVC less than 35%
* History of second or third degree atrioventricular block, heat rate less than 50 beat per minute or systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg
* Pregnancy
* Patients with a known history of allergy to the study drugs, or to eggs, soybeans or sulfite products
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ting-Yu Lin
Medical doctor, Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ting-Yu Lin, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lin TY, Lo YL, Hsieh CH, Ni YL, Wang TY, Lin HC, Wang CH, Yu CT, Kuo HP. The potential regimen of target-controlled infusion of propofol in flexible bronchoscopy sedation: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e62744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062744. Print 2013.
Lo YL, Lin TY, Fang YF, Wang TY, Chen HC, Chou CL, Chung FT, Kuo CH, Feng PH, Liu CY, Kuo HP. Feasibility of bispectral index-guided propofol infusion for flexible bronchoscopy sedation: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027769. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
Lin TY, Fang YF, Huang SH, Wang TY, Kuo CH, Wu HT, Kuo HP, Lo YL. Capnography monitoring the hypoventilation during the induction of bronchoscopic sedation: A randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09082-8.
Ryu JH, Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee EH, Do SH, Kim CS. Randomized double-blind study of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for flexible bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):503-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer400. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Lin TY, Huang YC, Kuo CH, Chung FT, Lin YT, Wang TY, Lin SM, Lo YL. Dexmedetomidine sedation for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, a randomised controlled trial. ERJ Open Res. 2020 Nov 10;6(4):00064-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00064-2020. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201601093A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.