A Comparison of Sedative Drugs for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

NCT ID: NCT02157818

Last Updated: 2017-05-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Appropriate sedation is needed for medical diagnosis, treatment, and the safety for patients. In non-surgical approaches, benzodiazepines are broadly used for ideal sedated status for patients.

* However, especially in bronchoscope procedure, continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation is needed to prevent hypoxia due to respiratory distress induced by benzodiazepine.
* A alpha-2 agonist, dexmedetomidine, which has similar sedative effect, but has less adverse effect of respiratory distress compared to previous agents, was introduced.
2. It is necessary to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine with that of midazolam in ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

* Double blind randomized trial
* Primary outcome: The number and duration of desaturation, volume of sedative, any use of rescue midazolam, and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score (for efficacy), and hypertension, tachycardia, any need for mandible support or manual ventilation, and any need for intubation (for safety).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

midazolam

midazolam IV bolus 0.05ml/kg bolus in 1minute. rescue drug(Midazolam) 1 mg, IV boluses for double blinding setting, we use saline, 0.4 mcg/kg IV bolus in 10 minutes and 0.5 mcg/kg/h, as placebo.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine 0.4 mcg/kg IV bolus in 10 minutes. Dexmedetomidine 0.25-0.75 mcg/kg/h for RSS 3-5. Midazolam 1mg bolus IV pro re nata (PRN).

for double blinding setting, IV bolus 0.05ml/kg bolus in 1minute.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who visit Seoul National University Hospital between 2014.04 - 2015.04
* Patients who undergo EBUS-TBNA during the period
* Aged between 18-75
* Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification \>3
* Have glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 15ml/min 1.73m2 or undergoing hemodialysis
* End stage liver disease.
* Impaired ventricular functions (EF \<30%)
* Patients with baseline oxygen desaturation (resting SpO2 \<90%)
* Asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)of \< 1.0 liter
* Bradycardia \[baseline heart rate (HR)\< 60 beats/min\]
* Hypotension \[baseline systolic arterial pressure (SAP) \< 100 mm Hg\]
* Pregnant state
* Those intolerant or with an allergy to the study drug
* those unable or who refused to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jinwoo Lee

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim J, Choi SM, Park YS, Lee CH, Lee SM, Yoo CG, Kim YW, Lee J. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 May 1;38(5):534-540. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001370.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33122573 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dex512

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Alternative Sedation During Bronchoscopy
NCT01158820 COMPLETED PHASE4