Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol for Moderate Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT ID: NCT06212401
Last Updated: 2024-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Ketofol for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Trans-esophageal Echocardiography
NCT02867930
Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Cancer Patients Undergoing ERCP
NCT06409104
Efficacy Study of Dexmedetomidine Nasal Spray Combined With Propofol for Deep Sedation in ERCP
NCT07204106
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine Versus Propofol-ketamine for Sedation During Endoscopy in Hepatic Patients
NCT04906772
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine-Propofol Versus Ketamine-Propofol for Sedation
NCT06756594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer randomization. All patients were taken to the procedure room and venous access was secured on a non-dominant hand by 20G IV cannula, intravenous (I/V) fluid (ringer lactate or normal saline) was started by 8 ml/kg/h, and oxygen support was provided by nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Standard monitors were attached for heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2. Injection midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was also given I/V to every patient in both groups to decrease the anxiety of patients.
Patients received either Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. All syringes and infusion sets were covered by silver paper and these infusions were labeled as infusion 1 or 2. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".
During infusion, vitals were recorded at 0,1,3,5, and 10-minute intervals from the start, and the Ramsay Sedation scale score (RSS) was recorded every 1 minute. Both infusions were started as per the randomization of groups. The mean difference in time to achieve adequate sedation and time to good recovery were noted as outcomes in each group. In addition, complications during the procedure and recovery were also noted. Adequate sedation was defined as the time from initiation of infusion to achieve an RSS score of 4. While Modified Aldrete's score (MAS) was used to assess the recovery. Time from discontinuation of the infusion to achieve an MAS score of 9 was labeled as a good recovery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine in a 2 ml ampule of 100 ug/ml diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml.
Dexmedetomidine
Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr
Ketofol
2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) diluted in 8 ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol.
Ketofole
Patients received ketofol 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr
Ketofole
Patients received ketofol 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Any gender
* Scheduled for elective ERCP
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese)
* History of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Syed Muhammad Abbas
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Syed M Abbas, FCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
234
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.