Comparison of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Alone or With Dexmedetomidine

NCT ID: NCT06560892

Last Updated: 2024-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a customary procedure for treatment these days. After LC, patients may experience considerable pain. This study was performed with the objective of comparing the mean duration of analgesia of intraperitoneal bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine to intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine group

Patients received intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + 5 ml normal saline

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + 5 ml normal saline.

Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine group

Patients were given intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with normal saline 5 ml

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + 5 ml normal saline.

Dexmedetomidine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were given intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with normal saline 5 ml.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine injection

patients received intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + 5 ml normal saline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine injection

Patients were given intraperitoneal bupivacaine 50 ml 0.25% + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with normal saline 5 ml.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Local anesthetic Local anesthetic

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of either gender
* Aged between 20 and 70 years
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification) physical status I and II
* Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients sensitive to local anesthetics
* Patients with acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, or ascending cholangitis (temperature≥38.6°C, serum bilirubin≥1.2mg/dl, and ultrasound showing common bile duct diameter of ≥1cm).
* Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (FBS≥110 mg/dl)
* Uncontrolled blood pressure (SBP≥140 mmHg)
* Ischemic heart disease (EF≤40%)
* Pulmonary dysfunction (FEV≤70 percent of normal)
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bahawal Victoria Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

RESnTEC, Institute of Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhammad Aamir Latif

Research Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Qazi Anees, FCPS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bahawal Victoria Hospital

Syed Shakeel Ahmed, FCPS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shahida Islam Teaching Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Quaid-e-Azam Medical College

Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRQAZIANEESBVH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.