Comparing Post-Operative Analgesic Effects of PCAM With Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml vs PCAM With Dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml
NCT ID: NCT05288738
Last Updated: 2022-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-09
2021-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Many adjunct have been used in combination with morphine to observe the opioid sparing effects at the same time providing good analgesia.
Dexmedetomidine is a potent and selective alpha-2 receptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic effects. As dexmedetomidine and morphine act via different mechanism, this combination produces synergistic analgesic effects.
The objective of our study was to observe the effectiveness in pain relief between two low concentration of dexmedetomidine (2 mcg/ml versus 1 mcg/ml) as an adjunct to PCA morphine 1 mg/ml.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine + Ketamine for Postoperative Pain in C-Section
NCT07022821
Comparison of Pain ReliefofBupivacaineWith Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Alone in TransversusAbdominisPlane Block For Postoperative Anelgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries
NCT05244252
The Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Morphine Requirements After Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT04454515
Effect of Co-administration Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine on Quality of Recovery
NCT04706767
Evaluation of the Effect of Appropriate Sedation for Patients After Abdominal Surgeries : A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study
NCT02670954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Consent was taken during preoperative visit whereby patients were counselled on the use of PCA machine and assessment of pain score using visual analogue scale (VAS). All patients were not given sedative premedication before surgery. Induction of general anaesthesia was with IV fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, IV propofol 2 mg/kg and paralysed with IV rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Patients were given IV dexamethasone 0.2 mg/kg for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane to achieve MAC of 1.0 with oxygen and air in 1:1 ratio. All patients received IV morphine 0.1mg/kg intraoperatively, and surgical site infiltrated with levobupivacaine 0.5% 2 mg/kg. IV granisetron 1 mg was given to all patients at the end of the surgery and reversal was with IV neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and IV atropine 0.02 mg/kg.
All patients were connected to the PCA morphine with test drugs after arrival in the recovery area. Patients were encouraged to self-administer the PCA whenever required. In an event of uncontrolled pain, rescue analgesia was with IV fentanyl 20 mcg boluses. All patients upon discharged to ward from recovery bay must have pain score (VAS) of less than 4, respiratory rate more than 10, MAP \> 65 mmHg and HR \> 60 beats/minute.
Patients were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery to look at the cumulative PCA morphine usage, incidence of nausea and vomiting, sedation score, respiratory depression (respiratory rate \< 10 breath/min/). Side effects from dexmedetomidine namely hypotension (MAP \< 65) and bradycardia (HR \< 60) were also documented. The severity of nausea and vomiting was defined as mild, moderate, or severe while sedation was assessed according to five levels: 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The power calculation for this study was based on a pilot study observing PCA consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery, with a mean difference, 14.67 and pooled standard deviation 20.27 in regard to dosage delivered comparing PCA morphine with dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml to PCA morphine with dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml. A group of 34 subjects each would be needed for a study with an alpha level of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a beta level of 0.2 (80% power) including 10% dropout rate.
Data were analysed using IBMR SPSSRs Statistics MacOS version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, United States of America). The results were presented as frequency (percentage) and standard deviation whenever appropriate. The cumulative PCA morphine and dexmedetomidine usage pain score was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The incidence of sedation and PONV was analysed using Chi-square. Heart rate and blood pressure were analysed using independent T-test. A probability level of \< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group D1
PCA morphine 1mg/ml
Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml
34 patients received PCA morphine 1 mg/ml with combination of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml
Group D2
PCA morphine 1mg/ml
Dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml
34 patients received PCA morphine 1 mg/ml with combination of dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml
34 patients received PCA morphine 1 mg/ml with combination of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ml
Dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml
34 patients received PCA morphine 1 mg/ml with combination of dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/ml
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* going for elective or emergency laparotomy surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Creatinine clearance less then 30ml/min
* Current alcohol dependency
* Psychiatric illness on regular sedative-hypnotic drugs
* significant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)
* Chronic pain patient who on regular opioids
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yeoh Chih Nie, MMed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FF-2019-543
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.