Hemodynamic and Cardiac Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl by Intravenous Infusion as Adjuncts to General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgeries.
NCT ID: NCT07214714
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-01
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background :
Major abdominal cancer surgery is among the most invasive procedures, often associated with extensive tissue damage, severe postoperative pain, and delayed recovery. Inadequate pain management can result in adverse physiological responses such as tachycardia, hypertension, prolonged immobility, and extended hospital stay. Moreover, poorly controlled pain may impair immune function and contribute to neuroendocrine, metabolic, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary complications. Therefore, effective analgesia is essential to improve patient outcomes and recovery.
Multimodal analgesia has emerged as the gold standard for managing postoperative pain in major abdominal surgery. It integrates regional techniques (such as epidural or intrathecal analgesia), peripheral nerve blocks (e.g., transversus abdominis plane block), systemic opioids, and non-opioid agents including NSAIDs and acetaminophen. This approach minimizes surgical stress, maintains hemodynamic stability, and facilitates early ambulation and discharge.
Opioids, particularly fentanyl, are widely used as intrathecal adjuvants due to their rapid onset and favorable analgesic profile. However, selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine are gaining attention for their sedative, analgesic, sympatholytic, and hemodynamic-stabilizing effects. Administered intrathecally, epidurally, or intravenously, they can enhance analgesia while reducing anesthetic requirements without causing profound sedation.
Conventional monitoring with heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure may overlook subtle variations in cardiac output. Electrical cardiometry (ICON®) provides continuous, non-invasive, beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac parameters and has been validated across different patient groups. Accordingly, the present study aims to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to general anesthesia, focusing on their effects on hemodynamics and cardiac function in major abdominal cancer surgery using electrical cardiometry.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
NCT07105618
Effect of Addition of Dexmedetomidine or Ketamine to Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Proinflammatory Cytokines in Pelvi-abdominal Cancer Surgeries.
NCT06631625
Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl Added to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block
NCT03778671
Effect of Wound Infiltration by Ketamine Versus Dexmedetomidine Added to Bupivacaine on Surgical Stress
NCT02927379
Comparison of the Effect of Intravenous and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03393403
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group D
Patients will receive Dexmedetomidineloading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.
Dexmedetomidine
Patients will receive Dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.
Group F
Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.
Fentanyl (IV)
Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fentanyl (IV)
Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.
Dexmedetomidine
Patients will receive Dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients subjected to elective major abdominal cancer surgeries.
* The enrolled age will be ≥ 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusal
* Body mass index\>40 kg/m2
* ASA physical status IV-V, NYHA class III-IV.
* Chronic opioid consumption
* Contraindications to neuraxial block (coagulopathy, infection, or hematological disorders).
* Pregnant women
* Hypersensitivity to any of the used drugs
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nariman Khaled Abd Elmontalb Hamed
residant doctor at Assiut university hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
dexmedetomidine versus fentany
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.