Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy

NCT ID: NCT07105618

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-10

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Craniotomy presents true anesthetic challenges, mainly due to the need to optimize cerebral perfusion, facilitate brain relaxation, achieve rapid emergence for neurologic assessment, and minimize perioperative complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total intravenous anesthesia, particularly with propofol-based regimens, has gained favor in neurosurgical procedures for its neuroprotective properties, and reduced intracranial pressure; however, the choice of adjunct agents in total intravenous anesthesia remains a subject of ongoing investigation, especially regarding their influence on hemodynamic stability, analgesia, brain relaxation, and postoperative outcomes.

Total intravenous anesthesia techniques for craniotomy allow rapid recovery and stable hemodynamic parameters, so they decrease the hospital stay. The current study will compare the efficacy and safety profiles of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and magnesium sulfate as adjuncts in total intravenous anesthesia for patients undergoing craniotomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexmedetomidine group

Intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes before propofol infusion, followed by an intraoperative maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/hour.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Fentanyl group

Intravenous loading dose of fentanyl 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes before propofol infusion, followed by an intraoperative maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/hour.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Magnesium group

Magnesium sulphate 30-50 mg/kg intravenous over 15-30 minutes before propofol infusion, followed by intraoperative maintenance infusion of 10-20 mg/kg/hour.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Magnesium

Intervention Type DRUG

Magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

Fentanyl as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Magnesium

Magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex Magnesium sulphate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient acceptance.
* Physical status: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) 1\& II.
* Body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2.
* Type of operation: elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection.
* Duration of surgery: within 4 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with hemodynamic instability or anticipated postoperative mechanical ventilation.
* Patients with a known history of allergy to the study drugs.
* Advanced hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, and neurologic diseases.
* Patients with chronic opioid use.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fatma Mahmoud Ahmed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care & Pain Management, Zagazig University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zagazig university hospital

Zagazig, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sherif Mohammed Said Mowafy, MD

Role: CONTACT

01003523374

Mohamed gaber, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohamed mohamed, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Telci L, Esen F, Akcora D, Erden T, Canbolat AT, Akpir K. Evaluation of effects of magnesium sulphate in reducing intraoperative anaesthetic requirements. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Oct;89(4):594-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef238.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12393361 (View on PubMed)

Ali AR, El Ghoneimy MN. Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvant to propofol: comparative study in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;27(12):1058-64. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833e6e2d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20805754 (View on PubMed)

Chandar Chinnarasan V, Bidkar PU, Swaminathan S, Mani M, Vairappan B, Chatterjee P, Joy JJ, Dey A, Ramadurai R, Gunasekaran A. Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl-based total intravenous anesthesia technique on the requirement of propofol, brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, neuronal injury, and hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Dec 13;15:462. doi: 10.25259/SNI_892_2024. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39777171 (View on PubMed)

Preethi J, Bidkar PU, Cherian A, Dey A, Srinivasan S, Adinarayanan S, Ramesh AS. Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia vs. inhalational anesthesia on brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics in patients with acute subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: a randomized control trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun;47(3):831-837. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01249-4. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31664468 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Craniotomy anesthesia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain Tumor Surgery and Postoperative Delirium
NCT06863064 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA