Comparison Between Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine in Caudal Block for Post Operative Pain Control
NCT ID: NCT05919173
Last Updated: 2023-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-10
2021-11-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Doses of Dexmedetomidine With Bupivacaine in Caudal Block for Duration of Analgesia in Paediatric Infraumblical Surgeries.
NCT04700228
Comparison of Pain ReliefofBupivacaineWith Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Alone in TransversusAbdominisPlane Block For Postoperative Anelgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries
NCT05244252
Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Bupivacaine With and Without Dexmedetomidine in Patients With Abdominal Surgery
NCT06531603
COMPARISON OF BUPIVACAINE WITH AND WITHOUT DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN CAUDAL BLOCK AMONG CHILDREN UNDERGOING INGUINAL HERNIOTOMY
NCT07140627
Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Low Dose Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine
NCT05993975
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The regional anesthetic technique significantly decreases postoperative pain and systemic analgesic requirements. Caudal block, usually combined with general anesthetic technique is one of the most popular, reliable, and safe anesthesia techniques for abdominal and lower limb surgeries in children but the main disadvantage of caudal analgesia is the short duration of action after a single injection.
Bupivacaine is a long-acting, reliable local anesthetic agent that is used as a caudal analgesic, but different auxiliary agents need to be co-administered to improve its analgesic efficiency. Various additives used in the past to increase the pain-free period postoperatively and to decrease the analgesic requirement such as midazolam neostigmine, ketamine, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine.
Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly selective alpha 2 adrenergic agonists that has been described as safe and effective in many anesthetic applications and analgesic techniques. In contrast to other agents, it has sympatholytic, analgesic, and sedative effects, and is randomly free from side effects except for manageable hypotension and bradycardia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bupivacaine 0.25%
Bupivacaine 0.25% Dose: 1mL/kg body weight
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection Solution
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection Dose: 1mL/kg (milliliter per kilogram body weight)
Bupivacaine+DEX
Bupivacaine 0.25% plus Dexmedetomidine 1microgram/kg Dose: 1mL/kg
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection plus Dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg body weight
Bupivacaine HCL 0.25% Injection plus Dexmedetomidine 1micro/kg Dose: 1 mL/kg (milliliter per kilogram body weight)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection Solution
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection Dose: 1mL/kg (milliliter per kilogram body weight)
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.25% Injection plus Dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg body weight
Bupivacaine HCL 0.25% Injection plus Dexmedetomidine 1micro/kg Dose: 1 mL/kg (milliliter per kilogram body weight)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elective per-urethral cystolithotripsy
Exclusion Criteria
* Known or suspected coagulopathy
* Known allergy to any of the study drugs
* Any signs of infection at the site of the proposed caudal block
* Any caudal anatomical deformity
2 Months
7 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Shakil Malik
Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ali A Lanewala, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation. Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Units
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIUT-ERC-2021/A-258
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.