Caudal Dexmedetomidine Analgesia in Pediatrics .

NCT ID: NCT03791879

Last Updated: 2021-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dexmedetomidine (DEXM) is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist that has been used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia. This prospective double blinded randomized comparative study is designed to evaluate the analgesic effect of caudal increasing doses of DEXM 0.5 , 1 , 1.5 , 2µg/kg combined with Levobupivacaine (Levob) 0.125% (ED95% =125%=least effective concentration) in providing pain relief over a 24-h period and lowest surgical stress peak. Study hypothesis: Levobupivacaine 0.125 %( ED95) combined with different increasing doses of dexamedatomedine \>1 µg/kg could not add more analgesic \& stress response obtundation outcome, but increase side effects (sedation and hemodynamic depression). The peak cortisol level during urology surgery was at the end of the 1st postoperative (PO) hour. Aim of the Study: To detect the optimal analgesic and safe caudal adjuvant DEXM dose associated with the least side effects\& stress response modulation, guided by PO Cortisol peak difference in between the study groups during pediatric hypospadias surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEXM) is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist that has been used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia. This prospective double blinded randomized comparative study is designed to evaluate the analgesic effect of caudal increasing doses of DEXM 0.5 , 1 , 1.5 , 2µg/kg combined with Levobupivacaine (Levob) 0.125% (ED95% =125%=least effective concentration) in providing pain relief over a 24-h period and lowest surgical stress peak. Study hypothesis: Levobupivacaine 0.125 %( ED95) combined with different increasing doses of dexamedatomedine \>1 µg/kg could not add more analgesic \& stress response obtundation outcome, but increase side effects (sedation and hemodynamic depression).The peak cortisol level during urology surgery was at the end of the 1st postoperative (PO) hour. Aim of the Study: To detect the optimal analgesic and safe caudal adjuvant DEXM dose associated with the least side effects\& stress response modulation, guided by PO Cortisol peak difference in between the study groups during pediatric hypospadias surgery.

Optimal effective dose defined as; the least caudal DEXM dose which produce the best analgesic outcome \[least time to 1st analgesic request and lowest rescue analgesic dose (24Hs)\] associated with the least stress response (cortisol PO. first One hour peak), least PO sedation, and hemodynamic stability IO. \&PO. HR \& MAP. The peak cortisol level during urology surgery was at the end of the 1st postoperative (PO) hour.

. Material \& Methods A prospective randomized double blinded (drug injector and PO assessor) comparative study will be conducted in Mansoura university hospital after obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed parental consent 164 boys (age 1-6 years, ASA I) scheduled for hypospadias surgery. Exclusion criteria; (Operative time exceeding 3 hours, bodyweight \>25kg, bleeding diathesis, infection at the site of block, pre-existing neurological or spinal disease or abnormalities of the sacrum, inability to palpate the sacral hiatus by anatomic landmark palpation technique) or those with a history of allergic reactions to local anesthetics were excluded from the study. Patients will fast for solids 6h and water and 2 hours before surgery. After Patient Preoperative preparation, General anesthesia induction, caudal block and caudal drug injection (Levob plus DEXM) bolus will be injected according to each group as follow;

* Group A will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg.
* Group B will take Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg.
* Group C will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 1.5 µg/kg.
* Group D will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

The study outcomes recording:

1ry outcome: Time to (1st analgesic request OPS \>4). Secondary outcome: Total 24hours PO. Rescue analgesic dose IM pethidine 0.5mg/kg \[2,3\] based on local policy and protocol, Patients demographic data \[age, weight, end tidal Sevoflurane (volume %) prior starting skin closure, intraoperative fentanyl total dose, recovery time (time from discontinuation of anesthesia to spontaneous eye opening)\], Serum Cortisol level at basal before anesthesia and 1hour postoperative in between groups \[1\] , Apnea incidence (NO\&%), and desaturation (NO\&%), Objective pain score, Sedation score, Behavioral score for Agitation assessment, and Modified bromage score (residual Lower limb muscle weakness) recorded every 15 minutes for 1st hour then every 30 minutes for next 3 PO hours then at next 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th PO hours, hemodynamics, HR\&SBP the incidence of bradycardia and hypotension per 50% percentile. Recorded every 10 minutes IO for maximum operative time 3 hours and every 30 min PO for next 2h in the recovery room until the child was discharged to the ward.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

164 Boys for Hypospadias Surgery Under General Anesthesia With Caudal Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

• Group A will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/k

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.

After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

• Group B will take Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.

After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

• Group C will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 1.5 µg/

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.

After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

• Group D will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.

After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia

Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.

After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 164 boys (age 1-8 years, ASA I) scheduled for hypospadias surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Operative time exceeding 3 hours, bodyweight \>25kg, bleeding diathesis, infection at the site of block, pre-existing neurological or spinal disease or abnormalities of the sacrum, inability to palpate the sacral hiatus by anatomic landmark palpation technique) or those with a history of allergic reactions to local anesthetics were excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Abd Latif Ghanim

Associate Professor os anesthesia ICU & Pain medicine.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mohamed A Ghanem, A professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mansoura Univeristy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anesthesia department,Faculty of medicine, Mansoura univerisety

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MFM IR.18.11.322 - 2018/11/11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.