Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Dexmedetomidine With Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Caudal Block in Supra - Umbilical Surgeries
NCT03307590
Comparison of the Efficacy of Bupivacaine with and Without Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant on Penile Block for Postoperative Pain Relief in Pediatrics Undergoing Hypospadias Repair Surgery
NCT06789393
Comparison of Caudal Block Versus Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Repair Surgery
NCT04331418
Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine and Magnesium Sulphate in Caudal Block for Hypospadias Repair
NCT05837000
Caudal Combination of Dexamethasone and/or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgery
NCT03261921
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Optimal effective dose defined as; the least caudal DEXM dose which produce the best analgesic outcome \[least time to 1st analgesic request and lowest rescue analgesic dose (24Hs)\] associated with the least stress response (cortisol PO. first One hour peak), least PO sedation, and hemodynamic stability IO. \&PO. HR \& MAP. The peak cortisol level during urology surgery was at the end of the 1st postoperative (PO) hour.
. Material \& Methods A prospective randomized double blinded (drug injector and PO assessor) comparative study will be conducted in Mansoura university hospital after obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed parental consent 164 boys (age 1-6 years, ASA I) scheduled for hypospadias surgery. Exclusion criteria; (Operative time exceeding 3 hours, bodyweight \>25kg, bleeding diathesis, infection at the site of block, pre-existing neurological or spinal disease or abnormalities of the sacrum, inability to palpate the sacral hiatus by anatomic landmark palpation technique) or those with a history of allergic reactions to local anesthetics were excluded from the study. Patients will fast for solids 6h and water and 2 hours before surgery. After Patient Preoperative preparation, General anesthesia induction, caudal block and caudal drug injection (Levob plus DEXM) bolus will be injected according to each group as follow;
* Group A will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg.
* Group B will take Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg.
* Group C will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 1.5 µg/kg.
* Group D will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
The study outcomes recording:
1ry outcome: Time to (1st analgesic request OPS \>4). Secondary outcome: Total 24hours PO. Rescue analgesic dose IM pethidine 0.5mg/kg \[2,3\] based on local policy and protocol, Patients demographic data \[age, weight, end tidal Sevoflurane (volume %) prior starting skin closure, intraoperative fentanyl total dose, recovery time (time from discontinuation of anesthesia to spontaneous eye opening)\], Serum Cortisol level at basal before anesthesia and 1hour postoperative in between groups \[1\] , Apnea incidence (NO\&%), and desaturation (NO\&%), Objective pain score, Sedation score, Behavioral score for Agitation assessment, and Modified bromage score (residual Lower limb muscle weakness) recorded every 15 minutes for 1st hour then every 30 minutes for next 3 PO hours then at next 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th PO hours, hemodynamics, HR\&SBP the incidence of bradycardia and hypotension per 50% percentile. Recorded every 10 minutes IO for maximum operative time 3 hours and every 30 min PO for next 2h in the recovery room until the child was discharged to the ward.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
• Group A will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/k
Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia
Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.
After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
• Group B will take Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg.
Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia
Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.
After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
• Group C will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 1.5 µg/
Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia
Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.
After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
• Group D will take Caudal Levob 0. 125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia
Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.
After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal dexamedatomidine analgesia
Technique performance (Caudal block): classical technique; palpation, identification and puncture with the patients in the lateral position (permits easy access to the airway under general anesthesia) using a 22-G short-beveled needle under sterile conditions advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament.
After needle insertion, pre-calculated volume of Levob plus DEXM bolus was injected as follow; Group A Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 0.5µg/kg. Group B Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1µg/kg. Group C Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 1. 5 µg/kg. Group D Caudal Levob 0.125%+ DEXM 2µg/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1 Year
8 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Abd Latif Ghanim
Associate Professor os anesthesia ICU & Pain medicine.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mohamed A Ghanem, A professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Mansoura Univeristy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anesthesia department,Faculty of medicine, Mansoura univerisety
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MFM IR.18.11.322 - 2018/11/11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.