Ablation Index in Standard vs. High Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: A Randomized Study (AITAF)

NCT ID: NCT06406686

Last Updated: 2024-05-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-03

Study Completion Date

2025-06-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Ablation Index-guided high power - short duration (HPSD) ablation compared to conventional power settings in Cavotricuspid Isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter. Participants will be randomized to receive either AI-guided HPSD ablation at 50 Watts or conventional power settings at 30 Watts. Both arms will use the Carto 3D mapping system and the QDOT MICRO ablation catheter (Biosense Webster). An anatomically contiguous line will be created with \<6mm inter-lesion distance. After a standardized wait time of 30 minutes, ablation success will be assessed. The primary outcome is total radiofrequency ablation time. Secondary outcomes include procedural time, fluoroscopy time, safety outcomes, and 3-month freedom from recurrence. It is our expectation that HPSD will result in a shorter primary outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Title: A Randomized Trial of Ablation Index Guided High vs Standard Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter

Design: Prospective, two-arm, single center, superiority study with comparison of standard 30W power settings vs 50W high power settings

Purpose: To evaluate the superiority of high-power ablation settings over standard power settings in achieving block across the CTI for typical flutter

Enrollment: A minimum of 25 subjects in each arm. Enrollment over a period of 12 months.

Subjects: Subjects referred by a cardiac electrophysiologist for standalone radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter

Clinical site: Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Endpoints: Primary endpoint: total radiofrequency time per procedure

Secondary endpoints:

RF time to initial CTI block Total procedure time Time from procedure start to procedure end Incidence of early reconnections during wait period Incidence of dormant conduction during adenosine testing Total number of ablation lesions required to achieve durable CTI block Total analgesia and sedation usage, e.g. midazolam, fentanyl and propofol in mg and/or mL Post-procedure patient perception of a) pain and b) nausea on a scale of 1 (none) to 10 (maximum possible)

Secondary safety endpoints:

Steam pops Pericardial effusions Pericardial tamponade

Secondary follow-up outcomes:

The presence of durable CTI block if a subsequent EP study is performed within 3 months of the initial procedure (e.g. AF ablation) Recurrence of documented AFL within 3 months by available ECGs, telemetry, wearable monitors, or Holters Holter at 2 months for incidence and burden of atrial arrhythmias

Materials: 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system: CARTO, Biosense Webster Diagnostic catheters: 20-pole halo catheter, 10 pole coronary sinus catheter Ablation catheter: QDOT MICRO, BiosenseWebster

Sponsors: None, fellow initiated research

Despite the existing observational data, there have been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating HPSD in CTI ablation to validate its effectiveness. Furthermore, the applicability of AI to CTI ablation has not been tested. It's important to note that CTI ablation, performed under conscious sedation, introduces respiratory movement, leading to increased CF variability, which may affect precise energy delivery.

We propose conducting the first RCT, to our knowledge, investigating the use of High-Power Short-Duration Ablation (HPSD) in the treatment of CTI-dependent flutter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Flutter Atrial Flutter Typical Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Macroreentry Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Single-blinded. Investigator will know study arm, patients/participants will not. The outcomes assessor will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

30 Watt

Power set to 30 Watts

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.

50 Watt

Power set to 50 Watts

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter

Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinically determined by a cardiac electrophysiologist to have had at least one episode of CTI dependent atrial flutter
2. Clinically determined by a cardiac electrophysiologist likely to benefit from standalone CTI ablation
3. For this to be their first CTI ablation attempt
4. Able and willing to comply with all protocol requirements
5. Agree to and sign patient Informed Consent Form (ICF)
6. Be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous CTI ablation
2. Adult congenital heart disease, including Ebstein's anomaly
3. Previous surgery involving the tricuspid valve and atrium including cannulation scars for cardiopulmonary bypass
4. Pediatric population age \<18
5. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
6. Active enrollment in another investigational study involving a drug or device.
7. A requirement for additional procedures in the same setting. Such as EP study and ablation of other induced arrhythmias since these prolong secondary endpoints such as procedure time and RF time
8. Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) such as flecainide, sotalol, or amiodarone should have their AAD stopped 3 days prior, and not be restarted after the procedure
9. Patients under General Anesthetic (GA)
10. Patients with sufficient baseline cognitive impairment to be unable to answer a post-procedure survey or consent Previous ablations, other than for CTI flutter, are acceptable.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rory Dowd

EP fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

George D Veenhuyzen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Rory P Dowd, MBBS, MEng

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

George D Veenhuyzen, MD

Role: CONTACT

(403) 944-3385

Stephen Wilton, MD

Role: CONTACT

(403) 210-7102

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Golian M, Ramirez FD, Alqarawi W, Hansom SP, Nery PB, Redpath CJ, Nair GM, Shaw GC, Davis DR, Birnie DH, Sadek MM. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Oct 3;1(5):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.09.002. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34113888 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REB24-0132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abbott Atrial Fibrillation Post Approval Study
NCT05434650 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING