Ablation Index in Standard vs. High Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: A Randomized Study (AITAF)
NCT ID: NCT06406686
Last Updated: 2024-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-03
2025-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Therapy of Atrial Flutter by Afib Ablation
NCT02051621
Typical Atrial Flutter, Ablation Index and Point by Point Ablation
NCT03867266
Randomized Study of Radiofrequency- vs. Cryo-Ablation for Typical Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter
NCT00196170
Ablation of Perimitral Flutter Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Outcomes
NCT01173796
Randomised Prospective Trial Comparing Contact Force and Non-contact Force Guided Catheter Ablation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
NCT02825498
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Design: Prospective, two-arm, single center, superiority study with comparison of standard 30W power settings vs 50W high power settings
Purpose: To evaluate the superiority of high-power ablation settings over standard power settings in achieving block across the CTI for typical flutter
Enrollment: A minimum of 25 subjects in each arm. Enrollment over a period of 12 months.
Subjects: Subjects referred by a cardiac electrophysiologist for standalone radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
Clinical site: Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Endpoints: Primary endpoint: total radiofrequency time per procedure
Secondary endpoints:
RF time to initial CTI block Total procedure time Time from procedure start to procedure end Incidence of early reconnections during wait period Incidence of dormant conduction during adenosine testing Total number of ablation lesions required to achieve durable CTI block Total analgesia and sedation usage, e.g. midazolam, fentanyl and propofol in mg and/or mL Post-procedure patient perception of a) pain and b) nausea on a scale of 1 (none) to 10 (maximum possible)
Secondary safety endpoints:
Steam pops Pericardial effusions Pericardial tamponade
Secondary follow-up outcomes:
The presence of durable CTI block if a subsequent EP study is performed within 3 months of the initial procedure (e.g. AF ablation) Recurrence of documented AFL within 3 months by available ECGs, telemetry, wearable monitors, or Holters Holter at 2 months for incidence and burden of atrial arrhythmias
Materials: 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system: CARTO, Biosense Webster Diagnostic catheters: 20-pole halo catheter, 10 pole coronary sinus catheter Ablation catheter: QDOT MICRO, BiosenseWebster
Sponsors: None, fellow initiated research
Despite the existing observational data, there have been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating HPSD in CTI ablation to validate its effectiveness. Furthermore, the applicability of AI to CTI ablation has not been tested. It's important to note that CTI ablation, performed under conscious sedation, introduces respiratory movement, leading to increased CF variability, which may affect precise energy delivery.
We propose conducting the first RCT, to our knowledge, investigating the use of High-Power Short-Duration Ablation (HPSD) in the treatment of CTI-dependent flutter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
30 Watt
Power set to 30 Watts
Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter
Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.
50 Watt
Power set to 50 Watts
Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter
Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ablation of the Cavo-tricuspid isthmus for typical Atrial Flutter
Durable block across the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency ablation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinically determined by a cardiac electrophysiologist likely to benefit from standalone CTI ablation
3. For this to be their first CTI ablation attempt
4. Able and willing to comply with all protocol requirements
5. Agree to and sign patient Informed Consent Form (ICF)
6. Be 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
2. Adult congenital heart disease, including Ebstein's anomaly
3. Previous surgery involving the tricuspid valve and atrium including cannulation scars for cardiopulmonary bypass
4. Pediatric population age \<18
5. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
6. Active enrollment in another investigational study involving a drug or device.
7. A requirement for additional procedures in the same setting. Such as EP study and ablation of other induced arrhythmias since these prolong secondary endpoints such as procedure time and RF time
8. Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) such as flecainide, sotalol, or amiodarone should have their AAD stopped 3 days prior, and not be restarted after the procedure
9. Patients under General Anesthetic (GA)
10. Patients with sufficient baseline cognitive impairment to be unable to answer a post-procedure survey or consent Previous ablations, other than for CTI flutter, are acceptable.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rory Dowd
EP fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George D Veenhuyzen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Rory P Dowd, MBBS, MEng
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Golian M, Ramirez FD, Alqarawi W, Hansom SP, Nery PB, Redpath CJ, Nair GM, Shaw GC, Davis DR, Birnie DH, Sadek MM. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Oct 3;1(5):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.09.002. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB24-0132
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.