A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT04148664
Last Updated: 2023-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-03
2022-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Controlled Trial- Ablation Strategy for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - Trigger and Substrate Guided Wide Area Radiofrequency Ablation Compared to Pulsed Field Ablation Pulmonary Vein Isolation
NCT04823299
Epicardial Mini-Maze Versus Catheter Ablation for the Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03446222
Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Totally Thoracoscope
NCT00844584
Left Atrium Substrate Based Ablation Plus Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
NCT01716143
Efficacy of Different Ablation Strategies for Controlling Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00379301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Catheter Settings
Group 1 - Standard RF ablation settings
Catheter ablation with Standard RF ablation settings
Standard RF ablation settings (n=30):
Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.
High Power Short Duration (HPSD)
Group 2 - High power short duration RF
Catheter ablation with High Power Short Duration RF ablation settings
High power short duration RF (n=30):
Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Catheter ablation with Standard RF ablation settings
Standard RF ablation settings (n=30):
Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.
Catheter ablation with High Power Short Duration RF ablation settings
High power short duration RF (n=30):
Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient is scheduled to have their first AF ablation
3. Paroxysmal or persistent AF
4. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 6 months
3. Known esophageal ulcer or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within prior 6 months
4. Intent to perform adjunctive left atrial ablation, including posterior wall isolation, left atrial appendage isolation, mitral or other linear lesions.
5. Prior rheumatic heart disease or significant mitral stenosis
6. Mechanical mitral valve replacement
7. Long lasting persistent AF \> 1 year
8. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with LV ejection fraction LVEF\<35%
9. Prior left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device
10. Prior septal occlusion device
11. Pregnancy
12. Pacemaker, defibrillator or any contraindication to MRI
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward P Gerstenfeld, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chief of Cardiac Electrophysiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Perino AC, Leef GC, Cluckey A, Yunus FN, Askari M, Heidenreich PA, Narayan SM, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Secular trends in success rate of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The SMASH-AF cohort. Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Kim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):961-967. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw128.
Asbach S, Biermann J, Bode C, Faber TS. Early Heparin Administration Reduces Risk for Left Atrial Thrombus Formation during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087. doi: 10.4061/2011/615087. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Feb;16(2):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.031.
Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
Nair KK, Shurrab M, Skanes A, Danon A, Birnie D, Morillo C, Chauhan V, Mangat I, Ayala-Paredes F, Champagne J, Nault I, Tang A, Verma A, Lashevsky I, Singh SM, Crystal E. The prevalence and risk factors for atrioesophageal fistula after percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Canadian experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):139-44. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9853-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
Nair KK, Danon A, Valaparambil A, Koruth JS, Singh SM. Atrioesophageal Fistula: A Review. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Oct 31;8(3):1331. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1331. eCollection 2015 Oct-Nov.
Han HC, Ha FJ, Sanders P, Spencer R, Teh AW, O'Donnell D, Farouque O, Lim HS. Atrioesophageal Fistula: Clinical Presentation, Procedural Characteristics, Diagnostic Investigations, and Treatment Outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005579.
Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, Nalliah C, Qian P, Barry T, Nadri F, Samanta R, Tran Y, Thomas S, Kovoor P, Thiagalingam A. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):874-880. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw077.
Baher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, Marashly Q, Kholmovski EG, Siebermair J, Acharya M, Aljuaid M, Morris AK, Kaur G, Han FT, Wilson BD, Steinberg BA, Marrouche NF, Chelu MG. High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1583-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SHORT-AF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.