A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT04148664

Last Updated: 2023-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-03

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare overall clinical outcomes between High Power Short Duration (HPSD) and standard radiofrequency (RF) ablation settings for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation in the treatment of subjects with paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a widely used treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation. Peri-procedural complications rates are estimated at between 1.5 - 6% with the two most feared complications being stroke and atrial-esophageal fistula. The risk of these complications increases with (1) longer left atrial dwell times with greater potential for clot formation and (2) esophageal heating during delivery of radiofrequency energy. 'High-power short-duration' (HPSD) is an increasingly utilized strategy to decrease procedure duration and minimize the risk of these complications. Potential mechanisms for benefit include: (1) shorter left atrial dwell times due to more efficient lesion delivery (2) rapid, but more controlled, resistive tissue heating, which avoids deeper, passive conductive heating that can reach the esophagus and cause injury. Moreover, HPSD may improve lesion efficacy and durability due to less recover of excitability after ablation. Despite being widely used and several retrospective studies, there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing outcomes between HPSD and standard RF ablation settings. Moreover, the investigators are interested to see if a shorter procedure (less time in the left atrium) is associated with a lower rate of silent cerebral infarctions (which are occasionally seen on MRI brain post RF ablation - their clinical significance is unclear).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a multi-center prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Enrollment of 60 subjects undergoing clinically-indicated AF ablation is planned with 1:1 block randomization (standard 'low power' RF settings n=30, HPSD n=30 and allowing for 10 drop-outs / consent withdrawals). Follow-up will be over 12 months.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Catheter Settings

Group 1 - Standard RF ablation settings

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter ablation with Standard RF ablation settings

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard RF ablation settings (n=30):

Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.

High Power Short Duration (HPSD)

Group 2 - High power short duration RF

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Catheter ablation with High Power Short Duration RF ablation settings

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High power short duration RF (n=30):

Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter ablation with Standard RF ablation settings

Standard RF ablation settings (n=30):

Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Catheter ablation with High Power Short Duration RF ablation settings

High power short duration RF (n=30):

Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female ≥18 years of age at their pre-operative visit.
2. Patient is scheduled to have their first AF ablation
3. Paroxysmal or persistent AF
4. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior AF ablation
2. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 6 months
3. Known esophageal ulcer or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within prior 6 months
4. Intent to perform adjunctive left atrial ablation, including posterior wall isolation, left atrial appendage isolation, mitral or other linear lesions.
5. Prior rheumatic heart disease or significant mitral stenosis
6. Mechanical mitral valve replacement
7. Long lasting persistent AF \> 1 year
8. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with LV ejection fraction LVEF\<35%
9. Prior left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device
10. Prior septal occlusion device
11. Pregnancy
12. Pacemaker, defibrillator or any contraindication to MRI
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward P Gerstenfeld, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief of Cardiac Electrophysiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perino AC, Leef GC, Cluckey A, Yunus FN, Askari M, Heidenreich PA, Narayan SM, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Secular trends in success rate of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The SMASH-AF cohort. Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30502925 (View on PubMed)

Kim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):961-967. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27256420 (View on PubMed)

Asbach S, Biermann J, Bode C, Faber TS. Early Heparin Administration Reduces Risk for Left Atrial Thrombus Formation during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087. doi: 10.4061/2011/615087. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21747989 (View on PubMed)

Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Feb;16(2):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.031.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30712645 (View on PubMed)

Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30067486 (View on PubMed)

Nair KK, Shurrab M, Skanes A, Danon A, Birnie D, Morillo C, Chauhan V, Mangat I, Ayala-Paredes F, Champagne J, Nault I, Tang A, Verma A, Lashevsky I, Singh SM, Crystal E. The prevalence and risk factors for atrioesophageal fistula after percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Canadian experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):139-44. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9853-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24317916 (View on PubMed)

Nair KK, Danon A, Valaparambil A, Koruth JS, Singh SM. Atrioesophageal Fistula: A Review. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Oct 31;8(3):1331. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1331. eCollection 2015 Oct-Nov.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27957213 (View on PubMed)

Han HC, Ha FJ, Sanders P, Spencer R, Teh AW, O'Donnell D, Farouque O, Lim HS. Atrioesophageal Fistula: Clinical Presentation, Procedural Characteristics, Diagnostic Investigations, and Treatment Outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005579.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29109075 (View on PubMed)

Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, Nalliah C, Qian P, Barry T, Nadri F, Samanta R, Tran Y, Thomas S, Kovoor P, Thiagalingam A. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):874-880. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw077.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27207815 (View on PubMed)

Baher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, Marashly Q, Kholmovski EG, Siebermair J, Acharya M, Aljuaid M, Morris AK, Kaur G, Han FT, Wilson BD, Steinberg BA, Marrouche NF, Chelu MG. High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1583-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30573123 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHORT-AF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF
NCT07153718 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Medtronic Terminate AF Study
NCT03546374 RECRUITING NA