HIgh Power Short Duration Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT04855890
Last Updated: 2021-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2023-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This trial will compare acute success rates, safety and foremost long-term outcome of two different PVI strategies (HPSD-PVI vs. cryo-PVI).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cryoballoon Ablation of Pulmonary Veins After Failed RF Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal AF
NCT01611701
Substrate Ablation and Remodelling in Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
NCT01445925
Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure
NCT04461691
High Power vs Standard Power RF Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Conscious Patients
NCT04250181
A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT04148664
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the past decade, the use of RF energy for successful PVI has been the "gold standard". However, ablation time and potential gaps within the circumferential ablation line are still an issue. High power (70 Watts) over short duration (7s) (HPSD) is a recently introduced RF-PVI concept. It has been shown to be as effective as conventional RF-PVI with equal safety features, shorter procedure durations and a superior long-term outcome. Therefore, HPSD-PVI in combination with the endpoint of "non-excitability" is potentially superior with regard to freedom of atrial arrhythmia during long-term FU compared to cryo-PVI with similar procedure times.
So far, randomized prospective data comparing HPSD versus cryo-PVI are lacking.
The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare acute success rates, safety and foremost long-term outcome of two different PVI strategies (HPSD-PVI vs. cryo-PVI):
1\. To find the safest and most effective treatment strategy for PAF patients. 2. To evaluate the risk of complications for both treatment strategies.
3\. Evaluation of procedure endpoints like duration, costs and radiation dose.
The present study is a mono-center prospective randomized study enrolling 170 patients with PAF and no prior Ablation for AF.
Patients will be randomized to one of the following groups. Group A: Cryo-Ablation PVI will be performed using a Cryo-balloon. Group B: High-Power-Short-Duration PVI will be performed using HPSD RF-ablation. (70W over 5s posterior and 7s anterior) Catheter ablation procedures will be performed with commercially available devices including 3D mapping systems (EnSite, Abbott) and irrigated radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation or cryothermal balloon ablation (Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic).
The study shall start enrolling patients in April 2021. The last patient shall be enrolled in January 2023. Since follow-up is 12 months, end of study is planned for January 2024.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Patients will be randomized to one of the following groups. Group A: Cryo-Ablation PVI will be performed using a Cryo-balloon. Group B: High-Power-Short-Duration PVI will be performed using HPSD RF-ablation. (70W over 5s posterior and 7s anterior) Catheter ablation procedures will be performed with commercially available devices including 3D mapping systems (EnSite, Abbott) and irrigated radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation or cryothermal balloon ablation (Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic).
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cryo-Ablation
Cryo-Balloon (Arctic Front Advance ProTM, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) will be advanced to the LA and navigated to the PV's using an inner-lumen circular mapping catheter (Achieve AdvanceTM, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After confirming complete PV sealing by the CB using occlusion angiograms cryothermal energy will be applied for min 120 seconds aiming at PV isolation of all PV's according to the clinical standard.
Ablation
The ablation procedure will be performed during deep sedation using midazolam, fentanyl and a continuous infusion of propofol. Vital parameters will be monitored. For catheter access three 8F sheaths will be inserted into the femoral veins. A multipolar diagnostic catheter will be placed in the coronary sinus. Single transseptal puncture and insertion of a 8.5 F transseptal sheath or 12F Cryo-Sheath (FlexCath AdvanceTM, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) will be followed by PV angiographies. Before or shortly after transseptal puncture unfractionated heparin will be repeatedly administered to maintain an activated clotting time between 250 and 400s.
High Power Short Duration-Ablation
A detailed electroanatomical map of the left atrium during sinus rhythm will be acquired using Ensite (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA).
Upon completion of the LA map, a second transseptal puncture will be performed in order to insert an ablation catheter. To achieve antral PVI irrigated radiofrequency current ablation will be performed using a power of 70W and a flush rate of 8-30ml/min with a duration of 5 seconds for the anterior and 7 seconds for the posterior LA. Ablation catheters used will contain Flexibilty (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) and TactiFlex (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA).
Ablation
The ablation procedure will be performed during deep sedation using midazolam, fentanyl and a continuous infusion of propofol. Vital parameters will be monitored. For catheter access three 8F sheaths will be inserted into the femoral veins. A multipolar diagnostic catheter will be placed in the coronary sinus. Single transseptal puncture and insertion of a 8.5 F transseptal sheath or 12F Cryo-Sheath (FlexCath AdvanceTM, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) will be followed by PV angiographies. Before or shortly after transseptal puncture unfractionated heparin will be repeatedly administered to maintain an activated clotting time between 250 and 400s.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ablation
The ablation procedure will be performed during deep sedation using midazolam, fentanyl and a continuous infusion of propofol. Vital parameters will be monitored. For catheter access three 8F sheaths will be inserted into the femoral veins. A multipolar diagnostic catheter will be placed in the coronary sinus. Single transseptal puncture and insertion of a 8.5 F transseptal sheath or 12F Cryo-Sheath (FlexCath AdvanceTM, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) will be followed by PV angiographies. Before or shortly after transseptal puncture unfractionated heparin will be repeatedly administered to maintain an activated clotting time between 250 and 400s.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-85 years.
* Patient is able to provide informed consent and is willing to comply with the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of interventional or surgical AF-ablation
* History of stroke during the past 12 months
* BMI \>40kg/m2
* History of mitral valve surgery
* Severe mitral valve regurgitation
* Inability to be treated with oral anticoagulation
* Presence of intracardiac thrombi
* Contraindication or absolute indication for one of the two strategies
* Pregnancy
* Participation in other clinical studies
* Unwilling to follow the study protocol and to attend follow-up visits
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitätsklinikum Köln
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arian Sultan, PD Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cologne, Heart Center, Dept. of Electrophysiology
Daniel Steven, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cologne, Heart Center, Dept. of Electrophysiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of electrophysiology, Heart Center Cologne, University of Cologne
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27. No abstract available.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Murray MI, Arnold A, Younis M, Varghese S, Zeiher AM. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Aug;107(8):658-669. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1232-4. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, Reents T, Cifuentes J, Semmler V, Telishevska M, Otgonbayar U, Koch-Buttner K, Lennerz C, Bartkowiak M, Kornmayer M, Rousseva E, Brkic A, Grebmer C, Kolb C, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2020 Mar 1;22(3):388-393. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz342.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HIPAF-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.