Catheter Ablation Versus Thoracoscopic Ablation to Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT00296166

Last Updated: 2010-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patents with atrial fibrillation can be treated with the purpose of curing the arrhythmia.This may be achieved by catheter ablation and Maze surgery where the latter includes open heart surgery.

By catheter ablation the arrhythmia can be cured in about 70 % of patients who have episodes of atrial fibrillation. In patients with permanent atrial fibrillation the results are not as good.

We will compare a conventional ablation approach where lesions are created on the inside of the heart with a thoracoscopic approach where the lesions are created from the outside of the heart.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation will be considered for randomisation Patients will be randomised to either conventional endocardial catheter ablation or epicardial thoracoscopic ablation.

Objectives of study:

Primary endpoint:presence of sinus rhythm after 6 months Secondary endpoints: complications, cost-effectiveness, structural changes (evaluated by echocardiography), p-BNP and inflammatory markers, atrial fibrillation burden evaluated by Holter monitoring

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracoscopic epicardial ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Permanent atrial fibrillation documented on at least 2 ecg´s with more than 1 month between ecg´s. The diagnosis is verified on Holter.
* All patients have symptoms or do not tolerate rate control treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Psychiatric disease or suspicion of incapability to give informed concent
* Females with birth giving potential
* Previous heart surgery
* Previous ablation for atrial fibrillation
* Life expectance less than 1 year
* Congenital heart disease
* Expected need for heart surgery
* Heart failure (NYHA class IV)
* Inability to be treated with anticoagulation
* In case of previous deep venous thromboembolism og stroke the investigators will individually consider if the patient is suitable for inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesper H Svendsen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Risghospitalet,

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KF - 01-284215

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KAT-SKOPI study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.