Combined Endoscopic Epicardial and Percutaneous Endocardial Ablation Versus Repeated Catheter Ablation in Persistent and Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT02695277

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized (2:1) multicenter trial to investigate the optimal treatment of Persistent and Longstanding Persistent AF referred for Radiofrequency (RF) ablation.The study objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of two interventional approaches, in preventing the recurrence of AF in symptomatic, drug refractory patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Persistent and Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hybrid Procedure

Endoscopic epicardial surgical ablation (first stage) combined with endocardial catheter ablation (second stage) performed between 91 and 180 days post index procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AtriCure Bipolar System

Intervention Type DEVICE

AtriClip® PRO LAA Exclusion System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endocardial Ablation with Catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Catheter Procedure

Standard catheter ablation with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (minimum lesion set) and optional additional lesions (index procedure). When required due to AF recurrence, ablation may be repeated within 6 months after the index-procedure according to clinical indications and consistent with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS) Consensus Statement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Endocardial Ablation with Catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repeated Endocardial ablation(s)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AtriCure Bipolar System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard Endocardial Ablation with Catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

AtriClip® PRO LAA Exclusion System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endocardial Ablation with Catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repeated Endocardial ablation(s)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient has a history of symptomatic Persistent AF and a left atrium (LA) \> 4cm or Long Standing Persistent AF as defined by the HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement
2. Patient is refractory to or intolerant of at least one antiarrhythmic drug (class I or III)
3. Patient is mentally able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has longstanding persistent AF \> 10 years
2. Patient presenting with paroxysmal AF
3. Patient with persistent AF and a LA-diameter ≤ 4cm
4. AF is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or other reversible or non-cardiovascular cause
5. Patient underwent previous ablation procedure or heart surgery
6. Patient needs other cardiac surgery procedures besides AF treatment (valve, coronary, others)
7. Contraindication for either catheter ablation or epicardial surgery (including, but not limited to: previous thoracic radiation, previous perimyocarditis, Previous cardiac tamponade, Pleural adhesions, Prior thoracotomy)
8. Body mass index \> 35
9. LA Diameter \> 6 cm
10. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30 %
11. Severe mitral regurgitation (\>II)
12. Patient unable to undergo TransEsophageal Echocardiogram (TEE)
13. Presence of LA thrombus by TEE, CT scan, MRI or angiography
14. History of cerebrovascular disease, including stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to enrollment
15. Active infection or sepsis
16. Other clinical conditions precluding inclusion (e.g., organ disease, disturbances of hemostasis)
17. Contraindication to anticoagulant therapy, or inability to comply with anticoagulant therapy
18. Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding
19. Life expectancy is less than 12 months
20. Patient is involved in another study involving an investigational drug or device
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cardialysis BV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AtriCure, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr Tomáš Ostřížek

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Czech Budejovice Hospital, Inc.

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt

Bad Neustadt an der Saale, , Germany

Site Status

Schüchtermann-Schiller'sche Kliniken Herzzentrum Osnabrück

Bad Rothenfelde, , Germany

Site Status

Heart Center Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Ludwigsburg

Ludwigsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Peter Osypka Heart Center Munich

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Kliniken Sindelfingen

Sindelfingen, , Germany

Site Status

Sana Heart Center Stuttgart

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

St. Antonius Hospital

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Northern General Hospital

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Germany Netherlands Poland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Doll N, Weimar T, Kosior DA, Bulava A, Mokracek A, Monnig G, Sahu J, Hunter S, Wijffels M, van Putte B, Rub N, Nemec P, Ostrizek T, Fransen E, Suwalski P. Durable effectiveness and safety of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation: 2-year results from the randomized CEASE-AF trialdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 1;67(7):ezaf146. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf146.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40711852 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP2015-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.