Patient Satisfaction and Maximum Biting Force in Co-Cr Bar Implant Overdenture

NCT ID: NCT06401187

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-10

Study Completion Date

2024-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Statement of problem. Patient satisfaction and maximum biting force from patients who wear 2-implant-retained overdentures with different constructed bar attachments can be improved.

Purpose. This randomised controlled clinical trial assessed patient satisfaction and maximum biting force with three differently constructed bar-retained overdentures (conventional casting, Milling and 3D printing CAD/CAM techniques) within a one-year follow-up.

Material and methods. A total of 60 implants were placed in 30 mandibular jaws(30 participants). The jaws were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: a 10 conventional technique cast Co-Cr bar attachment, a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachment, and a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar attachment all groups were connected to 2 implants in the canine area. Patient satisfaction was tested after 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Maximum biting force was tested at baseline,3 months, 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and ANOVA test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 60 implants were placed in 30 mandibular jaws(30 participants). The jaws were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: a 10 conventional technique cast Co-Cr bar attachment, a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachment, and a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar attachment all groups were connected to 2 implants in the canine area. Patient satisfaction was tested after 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Maximum biting force was tested at baseline,3 months, 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and ANOVA test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Co-Cr conventional technique cast bar attachments

conventional technique cast bar attachments

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bar overdenture

Intervention Type OTHER

use of bar attachments as retentive mean of denture

Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachments

Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachments

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bar overdenture

Intervention Type OTHER

use of bar attachments as retentive mean of denture

Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D bar attachments

Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D bar attachments

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bar overdenture

Intervention Type OTHER

use of bar attachments as retentive mean of denture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bar overdenture

use of bar attachments as retentive mean of denture

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

bar overdenture implants

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with sufficient residual alveolar bone quantity and quality anterior to the mental foramen to receive self-taping root form titanium implants.
2. Maxillary and Mandibular residual alveolar ridges covered with healthy mucosa without any remaining roots or local inflammation.
3. Patients with sufficient inter-arch space (at least 15 mm) to have overdenture and bar attachment.
4. U-shaped lower ridge to avoid the lingual placement of the bar that occurs with a V-shaped ridge.
5. Patients with skeletal and dental class I.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with systemic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, any disease of immunity, febrile conditions such as epilepsy, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism, and impaired psychological conditions that might affect the oral tissues or the bone metabolic rate.
2. Patients with local and general contraindications for surgical procedures.
3. Patients with TMJ or neuromuscular disorder.
4. Patients with Para functional habits such as bruxism and clenching.
5. Patients with impacted teeth or remaining roots.
6. Alcoholic patients.
7. Patients with a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
8. Non-cooperative patients.
9. Patients with a history of bisphosphonate intake.
10. Patients with flabby tissues, bony undercuts, sharp bony edges, thin ridges or abnormalities at the lower alveolar ridge and recent extraction.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

mona nabawy

lecturer assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amr E Badr, phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minia University

Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Badr AMI, Nabawy M, Mohammed GF, Radwan SA. Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05092-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39522003 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Amr Esmail

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

shaimaa Radwan

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

644

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.