Improving Breaking Bad News in Pediatrics by Simulated Communication

NCT ID: NCT06376188

Last Updated: 2024-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breaking bad news, especially a death notice, is an essential part of the medical profes-sional communication. Being inadequately trained in those skills this may result in un-pleasant psychosocial consequences for everyone involved.

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial evaluated the delivery of a death notice to simulation parents out of the perspective of these parents (professional actors), the participants (students) and by video analysis. The simulation patient has prior unexpectedly died during a simulated resuscitation. The intervention group broke the bad news after receiving a short communication

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conversations about death and dying present discomfort for both healthcare professionals, patients and their families. These conversations, emotionally laden, pose lasting challenges and impact decision-making. Despite extensive medical training, physicians often lack adequate communication skills for such conversations, leading to frustration and distress. Delivering bad news, particularly in pediatrics, requires managing not only medical intricacies but also emotional impact. Communication skills, crucial for such scenarios, are typically developed over time through observation and practice, yet are often inadequately emphasized in medical training. Our study aimed to assess the impact of communication training on medical students delivering death notifications to simulation parents in pediatric simulation scenarios.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication End of Life Pediatric ALL

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

no communication training prior to simulation scenario

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Communication-Trained

communication training prior to simulation scenario

Group Type OTHER

communication training

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group received a communication training session prior to the prebriefing and familiarization of the scenario, including advice on how to improve communication skills as well as how to create an optimal setting for difficult medical conversations. This communication training session has been created on the basis of an in-depth literature research.(Brock et al., 2019; Chumpitazi et al., 2016; Collins et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2016; Tobler et al., 2014; Vaidya et al., 1999; Yuan et al., 2019)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

communication training

The intervention group received a communication training session prior to the prebriefing and familiarization of the scenario, including advice on how to improve communication skills as well as how to create an optimal setting for difficult medical conversations. This communication training session has been created on the basis of an in-depth literature research.(Brock et al., 2019; Chumpitazi et al., 2016; Collins et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2016; Tobler et al., 2014; Vaidya et al., 1999; Yuan et al., 2019)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medical students, enrolled at the Medical University of Vienna.
* Successful completion the mandatory basic life support training "Block 16" in the third year of medical training and
* Successful completion of the mandatory communication seminar "Ärztliche Gesprächsführung B" also in the third year of medical training.
* Obtained written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* quality of the obtained video recordings were unsatisfactory and not usable for analysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jennifer Bettina Brandt; MD MSc

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jennifer Bettina Brandt, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Vienna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Babu TA. Breaking bad news in the paediatric ICU: need for ethical practice. Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):278-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.085. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24152358 (View on PubMed)

Bittner-Fagan H, Davis J, Savoy M. Improving Patient Safety: Improving Communication. FP Essent. 2017 Dec;463:27-33.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29210557 (View on PubMed)

Brock KE, Tracewski M, Allen KE, Klick J, Petrillo T, Hebbar KB. Simulation-Based Palliative Care Communication for Pediatric Critical Care Fellows. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;36(9):820-830. doi: 10.1177/1049909119839983. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30974949 (View on PubMed)

de Moura Villela EF, Bastos LK, de Almeida WS, Pereira AO, de Paula Rocha MS, de Oliveira FM, Bollela VR. Effects on Medical Students of Longitudinal Small-Group Learning about Breaking Bad News. Perm J. 2020;24:19.157. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.157. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32097117 (View on PubMed)

Chumpitazi CE, Rees CA, Chumpitazi BP, Hsu DC, Doughty CB, Lorin MI. Creation and Assessment of a Bad News Delivery Simulation Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows. Cureus. 2016 May 1;8(5):e595. doi: 10.7759/cureus.595.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27335708 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1582/2021 SimCom

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The RECORD-ED Pilot Study
NCT04676490 COMPLETED NA