Impact of a Protocol for Announcing Decision of Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Treatments on the Stress of the Relatives in the Emergency Departments
NCT ID: NCT06071078
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
538 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-19
2026-01-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It has been established that symptoms of anxiety and depression are correlated with the onset of posttraumatic stress disorder and that the latter is more important in the families of deceased patients and after a decision to undergo decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care unit. In order to identify it, several tools have been developed, including the Impact Event Scale (IES), which has been widely used to detect symptoms related to PTSD.
It has also been shown that training nursing staff in communication skills or the use of written support in dealing with the families of patients who have died in intensive care reduces the appearance of post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Human simulation is a pedagogical technique for learning interpersonal skills through role playing. It is used, among other things, in announcement situations in medicine. Nevertheless, its impact in emergency medicine has not been evaluated.
Moreover, it has been shown that the involvement of the patient-partner in the care process must be improved and encouraged and that its impact has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, the objective is to evaluate the impact of a model protocol for announcing decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments, with human simulation and the intervention of partner families in a simulation center and in situ, on the reduction of family stress following the announcement of a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in the emergency departments.
Hypothesis is that training all emergency department caregivers in the use of a model announcement protocol with the support of human simulation, combining training of pairs in a simulation center and in situ training, and the participation of partner families, would allow for a better understanding of announce of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments decision in the emergency department and reduce their impact on families in terms of the occurrence of acute stress and post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact on Mortality of Hospitalisation of a Patient in a Hospital Bed That Does Not Correspond to His Needs After a Visit to the Emergency Department
NCT07347847
BECOME PATIENTS IN THE EMERGENCIES OF UHC POITIERS
NCT03449043
Improving Discharge Communication in the Emergency Department Through Information Structuring
NCT02468869
Use of a Brief Phone Call After ED Discharge
NCT01893931
Healthcare Renunciation During the Confinement Period in Connection With the COVID-19 Epidemic in Adult Emergency Departments
NCT04460196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DISCUSS announcement protocol
Model protocol for announcing decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments, with human simulation and the intervention of partner families in a simulation center and in situ, on the reduction of family stress following the announcement of a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in the emergency departments
Training of professionals according to the DISCUSS announcement protocol
The emergency services will be divided into 4 clusters (2 or 3 services per cluster). Each cluster will belong successively to the control arm and then to the intervention arm according to a 5 successive steps of 4 months duration (stepped wedge method). The deployment of the training will therefore not be done simultaneously in the different services.
Individuals in this group will have received a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments according to the DISCUSS announcement protocol, by a professional trained in this procedure.
Control
Individuals will receive the usual practices.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Training of professionals according to the DISCUSS announcement protocol
The emergency services will be divided into 4 clusters (2 or 3 services per cluster). Each cluster will belong successively to the control arm and then to the intervention arm according to a 5 successive steps of 4 months duration (stepped wedge method). The deployment of the training will therefore not be done simultaneously in the different services.
Individuals in this group will have received a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments according to the DISCUSS announcement protocol, by a professional trained in this procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Trusted persons, families or relatives present in the emergency departments and to whom the 1st announcement of a decision to limit or stop therapies is made by a physician participating in the study. Several persons can be included for the same patient (maximum 3) in the following order: trusted person \> family \> close relative.
* Age of trusted person, family or close friends over 18 years old.
* Informed consent given and voice rights signed for families accepting the semi-directed interview.
For caregivers, also included in the study will be:
* Caregivers on participating wards.
* Informed consent given and voice rights signed for families accepting the semi-directed interview.
For partner families, will be included in the study:
* Trusted persons, families or relatives present in the emergency department and to whom the 1st announcement of a decision to limit or stop therapy by a physician in a participating emergency department is made.
* Age of trusted person, family or close friends over 18 years old.
* Signed consent for the right to voice recording.
Exclusion Criteria
* Trusted person, family or close friend whose announcement would have been made entirely by telephone.
* Trusted person, family or close friend unable to understand or write in French.
* Pregnant women, women in labor or nursing mothers.
* Persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.
* Persons under psychiatric care.
* Persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research.
* Persons of full age who are subjects to a legal protection measure (guardians, curators).
* Persons not affiliated to a social security system or beneficiaries of a similar system.
For caregivers:
\- Persons not affiliated to a social security system or beneficiaries of a similar system.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
CH de Bourg-en-Bresse
Bourg-en-Bresse, , France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Groupement hospitalier centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
Groupement hospitalier nord, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
Groupement hospitalier sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
CH de Villefranche
Villefranche-sur-Saône, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Perrine MD LEDUC
Role: primary
Sébastien MD ROUX
Role: primary
Fares PR MOUSTAFA
Role: primary
Damien MD VIGLINO
Role: primary
Charlotte MD DUPUY
Role: primary
Bénédicte MD CLEMENT
Role: primary
Véronique MD POTINET
Role: primary
Xavier MD DUBUCS
Role: primary
Frédéric MD VERBOIS
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Termoz A, Subtil F, Drouin P, Marchal M, Verroul M, Langlois C, Bravant E, Jacquin L, Clement B, Viglino D, Roux-Boniface D, Verbois F, Demarquet M, Dubucs X, Douillet D, Tazarourte K, Schott-Pethelaz AM, Haesebaert J, Douplat M. Evaluating the impact of a standardised intervention for announcing decisions of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments on the stress of relatives in emergency departments (DISCUSS): protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e087444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087444.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
69HCL20_0070
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.