UK ANDROMEDA-Shock-2 RCT

NCT ID: NCT06366854

Last Updated: 2024-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2028-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the trial is to test if a strategy of resuscitation guided by capillary refill time and individualised clinical hemodynamic phenotyping can improve important clinical outcomes within 28 days in septic shock patients compared to usual care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Septic shock is a life-threatening condition caused by a severe infection. It can rapidly cause multi-organ failure and is associated with a high risk of dying. Patients with septic shock need emergency treatment with intravenous fluids, antibiotics and medications to improve blood supply to all organs. However, it is clear that giving too much fluid is harmful and giving not enough fluid can make organ failure worse, too. International guidelines exist but there is still a lot of variation in how doctors apply the guideline. Further, it is likely that a "one-size-fits-all" approach does not help all patients.

Previously, the Andromeda-Shock 1 trial showed that resuscitation guided by regular monitoring of skin perfusion was associated with a lower risk of dying than resuscitation guided by regular blood tests. The UK Andromeda-Shock-2 RCT builds on this. The aim is to investigate whether an individualised approach based on monitoring of skin perfusion combined with individualised treatment of the blood pressure and circulation for 6 hours is better for patients with septic shock and reduces the risk of organ failure and dying compared to usual care.

During the study period, the investigators will also take a total of 40ml of blood and 60ml of urine for special kidney tests to evaluate kidney health and recovery of kidney function.

After the study has finished, the investigators plan to share fully anonymised results with the investigators of the international Andromeda Shock 2 trial to get as much information as possible to answer the research question and help patients in future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Management consists of a strategy that targets capillary refill time and individualised haemodynamic parameters, using vasopressors, fluids as guided by fluid responsiveness tests and inotropic support as guided by echocardiography.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Personalised fluid and haemodynamic resuscitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised resuscitation

control group

Management guided by clinical team

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Personalised fluid and haemodynamic resuscitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised resuscitation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalised fluid and haemodynamic resuscitation

individualised resuscitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) with septic shock defined by Sepsis-3 consensus criteria. (ie septic shock defined as suspected or confirmed infection, hyperlactatemia and noradrenaline requirement, after a fluid load of at least 1000mL in 1 hour)

Exclusion Criteria

Any of the following criteria preclude participation to the trial:

1. More than 4 hours since septic shock diagnosis,
2. Surgery or acute renal replacement therapy anticipated to start during the 6h intervention period
3. Active bleeding,
4. Child B-C Cirrhosis
5. Underlying disease process with a life expectancy \<90 days
6. Attending clinician deems aggressive resuscitation unsuitable
7. Refractory shock (high risk of death within 24h)
8. Pregnancy
9. Concomitant severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
10. Capillary refill time cannot be accurately assessed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marlies Ostermann, PhD

Role: CONTACT

00442071883036

Gillian Radcliffe

Role: CONTACT

00442071883036

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS: 332418

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.