Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock
NCT ID: NCT01449721
Last Updated: 2017-10-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
142 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent data has shown that in-hospital disease progression from sepsis to septic shock is associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality than those with shock on initial presentation. Yet, even when identified and treated with early aggressive interventions, the development of septic shock is still associated with a mortality rate of 25-40%.
Although the presence of sustained arterial hypotension or serum lactate elevation (\>4.0 mmol/L) are the currently recommended threshold to define the presence of overt shock and the need for aggressive resuscitation, the investigators have shown that, in patients with systemic infection, a moderate lactate elevation (2.0-3.9 mmol/L) is a common occurrence and an important warning sign for the increased risk of disease progression and death. Sepsis with an elevated lactate between 2.0-3.9, referred to as the "PRE-SHOCK" state, identifies this population of patients at-risk for poor outcome. Current guidelines for sepsis management do not recommend any specific resuscitation measures or therapies for this at-risk population. This study marks the first in a series of investigations addressing the PRE-SHOCK population to further define the adverse events within this cohort and to investigate novel interventions to improve outcomes.
The investigators hypothesize that an early quantitative resuscitation strategy using a protocol-directed IV fluid resuscitation will result in a significant reduction in the development of worsening organ failure (including shock) and mortality compared to standard care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Standard medical care by the primary treatment team.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventional arm
Protocolized empiric resuscitation delivering weight-based intravenous fluid resuscitation targeting lactate normalization
Intravenous fluid
0.9% Sodium chloride intravenous fluid
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravenous fluid
0.9% Sodium chloride intravenous fluid
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Serum venous lactate 2.0 - 3.9 mmol/L
* Hospital admission planned
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Serum lactate ≥ 4.0 mmol/L
* Any vasopressor or inotrope requirement
* Mechanical ventilation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation
* Chronic end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis
* Pulmonary edema as diagnosed by the primary care team
* Requirement for surgery within the treatment protocol timeframe
* Inability to obtain informed consent from subject or surrogate
* Patient to receive comfort measures only
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Christiana Care Health Services
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alan Jones, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Ryan Arnold, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cooper University Hospital: Cooper Medical School of Rowan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Detroit Receiving Hospital/University Health Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Cooper University Hospital:Cooper Medical School of Rowan University
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Schuerholz T, Filipescu D, Romain A, Hjelmqvist H, Reinhart K. Early- versus late-onset shock in European intensive care units. Shock. 2007 Dec;28(6):636-643.
Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Fuchs BD, Shah CV, Bellamy SL, Christie JD. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1670-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819fcf68.
Glickman SW, Cairns CB, Otero RM, Woods CW, Tsalik EL, Langley RJ, van Velkinburgh JC, Park LP, Glickman LT, Fowler VG Jr, Kingsmore SF, Rivers EP. Disease progression in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):383-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00664.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRESHOCK
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id