Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock

NCT ID: NCT00922870

Last Updated: 2025-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Septic shock is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Septic Shock is associated with an overwhelming, systemic overflow of pro inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, which leads to generalized endothelial damage, multiple organ failure, and altered cellular immunological responsiveness. Although our understanding of the complex pathophysiological alterations that occur in septic shock has increased greatly as a result of recent clinical and preclinical studies, mortality associated with the disorder remains unacceptably high, ranging from 30% to 50%. To date, attempts to improve survival with innovative, predominantly anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies have been disappointing. A standard hemofiltration rate of 35 ml/kg/hour has been successfully used to treat acute renal failure. However, this dose does not alter plasma levels of inflammatory mediators, suggesting that its ability to clear these mediators is suboptimal. Higher doses of hemofiltration (up to 120 ml/kg per hour) have been demonstrated to improve cardiac function and hemodynamics in several animal models of sepsis. High-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) was thus conceived and applied in patients with septic shock, showing an improvements in hemodynamics with decreased vasopressor requirements and improved survival in patients admitted after a cardiac arrest.

The main benefit described with high volume hemofiltration is a hemodynamic improvement (e.g reduction in catecholamines' requirement). This improvement seems to be due to the removal of a badly defined network of middle molecular weight peptides. To remove efficiently these middle molecular peptides, a high filtration rate is needed. However, with high filtration rates, there is also a high clearance for smaller molecules, including antibiotics, electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements and amino acids.

The cascade hemofiltration system has been designed for a more efficient removal of middle molecular weight peptides with a limited solute consumption.

The goal of this study is the evaluation of the hemodynamic improvement using cascade hemofiltration in patients treated for septic shock.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard therapy

Cascade

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cascade

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cascade treatment over 48h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cascade

Cascade treatment over 48h

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard treatment

Standard therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with a septic shock diagnosed by the medical staff team.
* Patient mechanically ventilated and treated by high doses of catecholamines after adequate fluid administration (≥ 1.0 mg/h of norepinephrine or epinephrine) for ≥ 120 minutes and \< 24h.

* Comorbid conditions with an expected survival \< 6 months
* Inclusion (\<28 days) in another study interfering with the goals of the current investigation.
* Pregnancy
* Immune compromised patients (e.g. being treated for cancer, treated by immunosuppressors or steroids, AIDS).

Exclusion Criteria

* Age (years) \< 18 or \> 85.
* Weight \>120 kg
* Thrombocytopenia 50\< G/l or Neutrophils \<0.5 Giga/l
* Contra indication to heparin anticoagulation.
* Patient requiring catecholamines (epinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h or norepinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h) for \>24h.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gambro Lundia AB

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vantive Health LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monchi Mehran, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Unaffiliate

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU hospital

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hopital Le Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Marc JACQUET

Melun, , France

Site Status

Hopital Tenon

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Delafontaine

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1450

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluid Resuscitation in Early Septic Shock
NCT00819416 COMPLETED PHASE2
The Cooling And Surviving Septic Shock Study (CASS)
NCT01455116 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3