Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-27
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adjuvant Therapy With CytoSorb in Refractory Septic Shock
NCT04013269
Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemoadsorption in Septic Shock in Critically Ill Cirrhotics
NCT03866083
Improvement of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Patients With Septic Shock Due to Cytokine Elimination
NCT04259567
Evaluating a CytoSorb Score in Septic Shock
NCT03977688
CLinical Efficacy of Hemoperfusion With a Cytokine Adsorber in Norepinephrine-Resistant SEptic Shock
NCT05136183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is, having this framework in mind, the reason why the CytoSorb-Adsorber has been developed as a new therapeutic milestone. Essentially a haemoperfusion-filter, which through its layering with polymer beads (Divinylbenzene/ Polyvinylpyrrolidone) can adsorb cytokines as well as multiple inflammatory mediators and thus effectively remove them from the bloodstream, reducing their possible systemic influence and hence improving the outcome for patients being treated with it.
The CytoSorb-Adsorber is an already CE-approved product, which has demonstrated its capacity to significantly reduce cytokine-levels such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα, HMGB-1, IL-1ra in a variety of pre-clinical studies. As well as in a clinical randomised multicentre study, which tested the CytoSorb-Adsorber on a cohort of ALI/ ARDS and severely septic/ septically shocked patients. The results of the later study can be very positively assessed, first of all and most importantly showing, that no security concerns had to be had in regard to the haemoperfusion-filter, as no adverse-effects attributable to the device were found. And further, by proving an effect on systemic cytokine-levels in form of a significant reduction in IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 and IL-1ra, as well as a reduction in mortality of those patients with high initial cytokine levels, effectively reducing the 60 day mortality rate from 60% to 17% in a pool of 14 patients.
With the intention to further elucidate the usefulness and clinical importance of this device this study proposes a prospective recruitment of patients in severe refractory septic shock to test the efficiency of this device.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cytokine Adsorption Arm
Intervention with CytoSorb
Cytokine Adsorption
Cytokine adsorption therapy will be provided continuously for 72 hours by means of the CytoSorb® (CytoSorbents Corporation, Monmouth Junction, USA) column, run in series to a veno-venous continuous hemodialysis system, which will be exchanged every 24 hours.
Historical Comparison
Patients extracted from a septic shock population treated at the same institution between 2010 and 2018 and matched to the intervention group.
Standard of Care
Standard intensive care of patients suffering septic shock
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytokine Adsorption
Cytokine adsorption therapy will be provided continuously for 72 hours by means of the CytoSorb® (CytoSorbents Corporation, Monmouth Junction, USA) column, run in series to a veno-venous continuous hemodialysis system, which will be exchanged every 24 hours.
Standard of Care
Standard intensive care of patients suffering septic shock
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
(I) severe, refractory septic shock defined as:
1. an acute SOFA score increase ≥2 points consequent to a presumed or proven infection
2. volume resuscitation of at least 30ml/kg in the last 24 hours
3. a Vasopressor Dependency Index11 (VPI) above or equal to 3
4. a persistently elevated serum lactate level \>2mmol/l (II) Interleukin-6 levels equal or above 1000 ng/l (III) were above 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
2. child bearing or breastfeeding women
3. terminal patients
4. human immunodeficiency virus with a CD4 cell count \<0.2 106/l
5. allergy to Polystyrene/ Divinylbenzene, Polycarbonate, Polypropylene, Silicon or Polyester
6. need for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
7. no given consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CytoSorbents Europe GmbH
INDUSTRY
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Maggiorini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medizinische Intensivstation D-HOER 27, UniversitatsSpital Zürich
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang H, Ma S. The cytokine storm and factors determining the sequence and severity of organ dysfunction in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;26(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.031.
Taniguchi T. Cytokine adsorbing columns. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:134-141. doi: 10.1159/000314863. Epub 2010 May 7.
Morris C, Gray L, Giovannelli M. Early report: The use of Cytosorb haemabsorption column as an adjunct in managing severe sepsis: initial experiences, review and recommendations. J Intensive Care Soc. 2015 Aug;16(3):257-264. doi: 10.1177/1751143715574855. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Rimmele T, Kellum JA. Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc9411. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
Reiter K, Bordoni V, Dall'Olio G, Ricatti MG, Soli M, Ruperti S, Soffiati G, Galloni E, D'Intini V, Bellomo R, Ronco C. In vitro removal of therapeutic drugs with a novel adsorbent system. Blood Purif. 2002;20(4):380-8. doi: 10.1159/000063108.
Kellum JA, Song M, Venkataraman R. Hemoadsorption removes tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10, reduces nuclear factor-kappaB DNA binding, and improves short-term survival in lethal endotoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):801-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114997.39857.69.
Peng ZY, Carter MJ, Kellum JA. Effects of hemoadsorption on cytokine removal and short-term survival in septic rats. Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1573-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170b9a7.
D Schädler, C Porzelius, A Jörres, G Marx, A Meier-Hellmann, C Putensen, M Quintel, C Spies, C Engel, NWeiler, M Kuhlmann. A multicenter randomized controlled study of an extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device in septic patients. Critical Care 2013, 17(Suppl 2):P62 (19 March 2013).
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cytosorb
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.