Efficacy & Safety of Resatorvid in Adults With Severe Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT00143611

Last Updated: 2012-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

277 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dose of Resatorvid for reducing 28-day all-cause mortality in subjects with severe sepsis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, remains a serious medical problem worldwide. In the United States alone, approximately 750,000 cases of severe sepsis occur each year, with the mortality rate ranging between 30% and 50% for severe sepsis patients with concomitant organ dysfunction. As the population ages, these numbers are expected to increase. The pathophysiology of severe sepsis is thought to involve the activation of a variety of inflammatory and procoagulant host responses to infection, which if unchecked, can lead to diffuse endovascular injury, multi-organ dysfunction, and ultimately death.

The host response to infection with microorganism and microorganism-derived molecules is characterized by the synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins 1, 6 and 8 (IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8), by inflammatory cells, and by other markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein. Inflammatory cells, such as macrophages, release these cytokines by signals transmitted from the surface of these cells after binding of pathogen-associated molecules to cell surface pattern recognition receptors known as toll-like receptors.

TAK-242 (resatorvid) is a small molecule suppressor of pathogen-induced release of inflammatory cytokines and acts by inhibiting TLR-4 mediated signaling. Because of its inhibitory effect on suppressing cytokine levels, resatorvid is being developed as a treatment for severe sepsis.

The study was ended after the DSMB determined there was insufficient cytokine suppression in the 150-subject analysis within Stage 1 of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Resatorvid 1.2 mg/kg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resatorvid

Intervention Type DRUG

Resatorvid 1.2 mg/kg, injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid 0.05 mg/kg/h (1.2 mg/kg/day), injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Resatorvid 2.4 mg/kg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resatorvid

Intervention Type DRUG

Resatorvid 1.2 mg/kg, injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid 0.1 mg/kg/h (2.4 mg/kg/day), injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Resatorvid placebo-matching injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid placebo-matching injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Resatorvid

Resatorvid 1.2 mg/kg, injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid 0.05 mg/kg/h (1.2 mg/kg/day), injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Resatorvid

Resatorvid 1.2 mg/kg, injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid 0.1 mg/kg/h (2.4 mg/kg/day), injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Resatorvid placebo-matching injection, subcutaneously for thirty minutes; then resatorvid placebo-matching injection, subcutaneously over 96 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-242 TAK-242

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has clinical evidence of infection defined as the presence of a known or probable source of infection requiring the initiation of parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
* Must meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria for SIRS:

* A core temperature greater than 38°C or less than 36°C.
* A heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute.
* A respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths/min or partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood less than 32 mm Hg or mechanical ventilation for an acute process.
* A total white blood cell absolute count greater than 12,000 cells/mm3 or less than 4,000 cells/mm3, or a white blood cell differential count that showed greater than 10% immature (band) forms.
* Must have sepsis with shock and/or respiratory failure.

Exclusion Criteria

* If female, the subject is pregnant, nursing and the milk is intended to be ingested by the infant, or the participant plans to become pregnant, or nurse and the milk is intended to be ingested by the infant.
* Is receiving immunosuppressive therapy such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, or cancer-related chemotherapy.
* Has a granulocyte count of less than 1000/mm3 except if the decreased count was believed to be due to sepsis.
* Has documented or suspected acute myocardial infarction within the last 6 weeks prior to Pretreatment Period.
* Has a documented history of moderate to severe chronic heart failure as defined by New York Heart Association Functional Classification III or IV.
* Is known to be positive for human immunodeficiency virus with known CD4 count less than or equal to 50/mm3 or had known end-stage processes.
* Has a known history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
* Has a methemoglobin level greater than 5% at Pretreatment Period or had a known history of methemoglobinemia.
* Is moribund and death was considered imminent.
* Is classified as "Do Not Resuscitate", or "Do Not Treat", or the participant's family has not committed to aggressive management of the participant's condition.
* Is not expected to survive for 28 days and was not likely be given life support due to a pre-existing, uncorrectable medical condition.
* Has a known esophageal varices, chronic jaundice, cirrhosis, or chronic ascites.
* Is in a chronic vegetative state or has a similar long-term neurological condition.
* Has known portal hypertension or Child-Pugh hepatic impairment class C.
* Has acute third degree burns involving more than 30% of body surface within 120 hours prior to Pretreatment Period.
* Has known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides.
* Has known hypersensitivity to components of resatorvid.
* Has participated in any other investigational study (drug or device) and/or taken any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Poway, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Atlantis, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bay Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Fremantle, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Ottignies, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Havlíčkův Brod, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Opava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Joensuu, , Finland

Site Status

Kokkola, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Lappeenranta, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Krefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Wuppertal, , Germany

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Lecco, , Italy

Site Status

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Hokkaido, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Numakunai, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Shizuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Yamaguchi, , Japan

Site Status

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leeuwarden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hastings, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Getafe, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Vitoria-Gasteiz, , Spain

Site Status

Gävle, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Kristianstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Livingston, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Finland Germany Israel Italy Japan Netherlands New Zealand Puerto Rico Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Angus DC, Aikawa N, Demeyer I, Sainati S, Amlot N, Cao C, Ii M, Matsuda H, Mouri K, Cohen J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TAK-242 for the treatment of severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1685-94. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e7c5c9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20562702 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-003561-16

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1127-5919

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DOH-27-0406-1213

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-04-TL-242-011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Molecular Biomarkers for Sepsis
NCT04280354 TERMINATED
Citrulline in Severe Sepsis
NCT01474863 COMPLETED PHASE2