The Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Trial
NCT ID: NCT03668236
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1554 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-27
2022-11-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care
NCT02079402
Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids vs Usual Care in Septic Shock Feasibility Trial
NCT05249088
Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids Versus Usual Care in Septic Shock Patients
NCT06140147
Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients
NCT05629780
Survey of Non-resuscitation Fluids in Septic Shock
NCT03438097
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Septic shock is common, often lethal, costly, and associated with prolonged suffering among survivors and relatives. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) fluids are used to optimise the circulation, and the use of higher volumes is recommended by international guidelines. There is, however, no high-quality evidence to support this. In contrast, data from cohort studies, small trials and systematic reviews in sepsis and large trials in other settings and patient groups suggest potential benefits from restriction of IV fluids in patients with septic shock.
OBJECTIVES:
The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess the benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction vs. standard care on patient-important outcome measures in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock.
DESIGN:
CLASSIC is an international, multicentre, parallel-grouped, open-labelled, centrally randomised, stratified, outcome assessor- and analyst-blinded trial.
POPULATION:
Adult ICU patients who have septic shock and have received at least 1 L of IV fluid in the last 24-hours.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTION:
In the IV fluid restriction group no IV fluids should be given in the ICU unless extenuating circumstances occur, including signs of severe hypoperfusion, overt fluid loss or a failing GI tract with a total fluid input of less than 1 L per day. In these circumstances, IV fluid may be given in measured amounts.
CONTROL INTERVENTION:
In the standard care group there will be no upper limit for the use of IV fluids.
OUTCOMES:
The primary outcome is 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes are serious adverse events in the ICU (ischemic events or severe acute kidney injury); serious adverse reactions in the ICU; days alive without life support at day 90; days alive and out of hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life and cognitive function at 1-year.
TRIAL SIZE:
A total of 1554 participants will be randomised to allow the detection of a 15% relative risk reduction (7% absolute) in the restrictive vs. standard care group in 90-day mortality with a power of 80%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fluid restriction group
No IV fluids unless one of the extenuating circumstances occur; then, IV fluid may be given in measured amounts:
1. In case of severe hypoperfusion or severe circulatory impairment defined by either:
* Lactate≥4 mmol/L
* MAP\<50 mmHg (with or without vasopressor/inotrope)
* Mottling beyond the kneecap (mottling score \>2) OR
* Urinary output\<0.1 mL/kg bodyweight/h, but only in the first 2hrs after randomisation
A bolus of 250-500 ml of IV crystalloid solution may be given followed by re-evaluation
2. In case of overt fluid losses (e.g. vomiting, large aspirates,…) IV fluid may be given to correct for the loss, but not above the volume lost.
3. In case the oral/enteral route for water or electrolyte solutions is contraindicated or has failed, IV fluids may be given to:
* Correct dehydration or electrolyte deficiencies
* Ensure a total fluid input of 1L per 24hrs
IV fluids may be given as carrier for medication, but the volume should be reduced to the lowest possible
Isotonic crystalloids
Types of fluid to be used in both intervention groups:
* IV fluids given for circulatory impairment: Only isotonic crystalloids are to be used as per the Scandinavian guideline for fluid resuscitation
* Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used
* Fluids used for dehydration: Water or isotonic glucose should be used
* Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency, including water in the case of severe hypernatremia
* Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy
Standard-care
There will be no upper limit for the use of either IV or oral/enteral fluids. In particular:
1. IV fluids should be given in the case of hypoperfusion or circulatory impairment and should be continued as long as hemodynamic variables improve including static or dynamic variable(s) as chosen by the clinicians. These criteria are based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline.
2. IV fluids should be given as maintenance if the ICU has a protocol recommending maintenance fluid
3. IV fluids should be given to substitute expected or observed loss, dehydration or electrolyte derangements
Isotonic crystalloids
Types of fluid to be used in both intervention groups:
* IV fluids given for circulatory impairment: Only isotonic crystalloids are to be used as per the Scandinavian guideline for fluid resuscitation
* Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used
* Fluids used for dehydration: Water or isotonic glucose should be used
* Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency, including water in the case of severe hypernatremia
* Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Isotonic crystalloids
Types of fluid to be used in both intervention groups:
* IV fluids given for circulatory impairment: Only isotonic crystalloids are to be used as per the Scandinavian guideline for fluid resuscitation
* Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used
* Fluids used for dehydration: Water or isotonic glucose should be used
* Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency, including water in the case of severe hypernatremia
* Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18 years or above
* Admitted to the ICU or plan to be admitted to the ICU regardless of trial participation
* Septic shock defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria:
* Suspected or confirmed site of infection or positive blood culture AND
* Ongoing infusion of vasopressor/inotrope agent to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mmHg or above AND
* Lactate of 2 mmol/L or above in any plasma sample performed within the last 3-hours
* Have received at least 1 L of IV fluid (crystalloids, colloids or blood products) in the last 24-hours prior to screening.
Exclusion Criteria
* Septic shock for more than 12 hours at the time of screening as these patients are no longer early in their course
* Life-threatening bleeding as these patients need specific fluid/blood product strategies
* Acute burn injury of more than 10% of the body surface area as these patients need a specific fluid strategy
* Known pregnancy
* Consent not obtainable as per the model approved for the specific site
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC)
OTHER
Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group
OTHER
Anders Perner, MD, PhD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anders Perner, MD, PhD
MD, PhD, Senior staff specialist , Professor in Intensive Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tine Sylvest Meyhoff, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Brussels (UZB)
Brussels, , Belgium
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Fakultni Nemocnice
Pilsen, , Czechia
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Aalborg, , Denmark
Dept of Intensive Care,Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herning Hospital
Herning, , Denmark
Dept. of Intensive Care, Hillerød Hospital
Hillerød, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Holbæk Hospital
Holbæk, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital
Kolding, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital Køge
Køge, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital
Randers, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde
Roskilde, , Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital
Viborg, , Denmark
Humanitas research hospital Bergamo
Bergamo, Milan, Italy
Dept. of Intensive Care, Humanitas Research Hospital Castelanza
Castellanza, Milan, Italy
Dept. of Intensive Care, Ancona Hospital
Ancona, , Italy
Dept. of Intensive Care, Humanitas Research Hospital
Milan, , Italy
Dept. of intensive care, Østfold, Kalnes
Grålum, , Norway
Dept. of intensive Care, Innlandet Hamar
Hamar, , Norway
Dept. of Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Stavanger
Stavanger, , Norway
Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, St Göran
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Dept. of intensive care, Huddinge
Huddinge, , Sweden
MIMA Medicinsk intermediärvårdsavdelning
Huddinge, , Sweden
Dept. of Intensive Care, Solna
Solna, , Sweden
Medical ICU, Karolinska, Södersjukhuset
Stockholm, , Sweden
Södersjukhuset
Stockholm, , Sweden
Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine Sundsvall Hospital
Sundsvall, , Sweden
Dept. of intensive care, Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Dept. of Intensive Care, University Hospital Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
Dept. of Intensive Care Unit, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Bundgaard H, Thomsen SL, Winding R, Pettila V, Aaen A, Lodahl D, Berthelsen RE, Christensen H, Madsen MB, Winkel P, Wetterslev J, Perner A; CLASSIC Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1695-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4500-7. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J, Sivapalan P, Laake JH, Cronhjort M, Jakob SM, Cecconi M, Nalos M, Ostermann M, Malbrain M, Pettila V, Moller MH, Kjaer MN, Lange T, Overgaard-Steensen C, Brand BA, Winther-Olesen M, White JO, Quist L, Westergaard B, Jonsson AB, Hjortso CJS, Meier N, Jensen TS, Engstrom J, Nebrich L, Andersen-Ranberg NC, Jensen JV, Joseph NA, Poulsen LM, Herlov LS, Solling CG, Pedersen SK, Knudsen KK, Straarup TS, Vang ML, Bundgaard H, Rasmussen BS, Aagaard SR, Hildebrandt T, Russell L, Bestle MH, Schonemann-Lund M, Brochner AC, Elvander CF, Hoffmann SKL, Rasmussen ML, Martin YK, Friberg FF, Seter H, Aslam TN, Adnoy S, Seidel P, Strand K, Johnstad B, Joelsson-Alm E, Christensen J, Ahlstedt C, Pfortmueller CA, Siegemund M, Greco M, Radej J, Kriz M, Gould DW, Rowan KM, Mouncey PR, Perner A; CLASSIC Trial Group. Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2459-2470. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2202707. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Moller MH, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Kjaer MN, Jonsson AB, Hjortso CJS, Cronhjort M, Laake JH, Jakob SM, Nalos M, Pettila V, van der Horst I, Ostermann M, Mouncey P, Rowan K, Cecconi M, Ferrer R, Malbrain MLNG, Ahlstedt C, Hoffmann S, Bestle MH, Nebrich L, Russell L, Vang M, Rasmussen ML, Solling C, Rasmussen BS, Brochner AC, Perner A. Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1262-1271. doi: 10.1111/aas.13434. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Sivapalan P, Kaas-Hansen BS, Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Kjaer MN, Laake JH, Cronhjort M, Jakob SM, Cecconi M, Nalos M, Ostermann M, Malbrain MLNG, Moller MH, Perner A, Granholm A. Effects of IV Fluid Restriction According to Standard Fluid Treatment Intensity Across Conservative Versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) Trial Sites. Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug 1;53(8):e1590-e1600. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006679. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
Sivapalan P, Kaas-Hansen BS, Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Kjaer MN, Laake JH, Cronhjort M, Jakob SM, Cecconi M, Nalos M, Ostermann M, Malbrain MLNG, Moller MH, Perner A, Granholm A. Effects of IV fluid restriction according to site-specific intensity of standard fluid treatment-protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Aug;68(7):975-982. doi: 10.1111/aas.14423. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
Kjaer MN, Meyhoff TS, Sivapalan P, Granholm A, Hjortrup PB, Madsen MB, Moller MH, Egerod I, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Cronhjort M, Laake JH, Jakob SM, Nalos M, Ostermann M, Gould D, Cecconi M, Malbrain MLNG, Ahlstedt C, Kiel LB, Bestle MH, Nebrich L, Hildebrandt T, Russell L, Vang M, Rasmussen ML, Solling C, Brochner AC, Krag M, Pfortmueller C, Kriz M, Siegemund M, Albano G, Aagaard SR, Bundgaard H, Crone V, Wichmann S, Johnstad B, Martin YK, Seidel P, Martensson J, Hollenberg J, Wistrand M, Donati A, Barbara E, Karvunidis T, Hollinger A, Carsetti A, Lumlertgul N, Joelsson-Alm E, Lambiris N, Aslam TN, Friberg FF, Vesterlund GK, Mortensen CB, Vestergaard SR, Caspersen SF, Jensen DB, Borup M, Rasmussen BS, Perner A. Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):820-830. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07114-8. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
Meyhoff TS, Moller MH, Hjortrup PB, Cronhjort M, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Lower vs Higher Fluid Volumes During Initial Management of Sepsis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. Chest. 2020 Jun;157(6):1478-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.050. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Kjaer MN, Meyhoff TS, Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Moller MH, Egerod I, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Cronhjort M, Laake JH, Jakob SM, Nalos M, Pettila V, van der Horst ICC, Ostermann M, Mouncey P, Cecconi M, Ferrer R, Malbrain MLNG, Ahlstedt C, Hoffmann S, Bestle MH, Gyldensted L, Nebrich L, Russell L, Vang M, Solling C, Brochner AC, Rasmussen BS, Perner A. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: A protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Mar;64(3):410-416. doi: 10.1111/aas.13519. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Official study website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RH-ITA-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.