Loaded Gait Training on Gross Motor Function in Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06339099
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-02
2024-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Antigravity Shoes on Improving the Quality of Gait in Children With Spastic Diplegia
NCT04117282
Effect of Core Stability Excercises Program on Reaching in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05316090
Moderate Versus High-intensity Interval Training in Children With Diplegia.
NCT07289373
Cross-Training and Locomotor Abilities in Cerebral Palsy
NCT06750081
Effect of Kinesio-taping of Lower Limbs
NCT06326164
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
52 children with bilateral spastic CP, aged 5 to 7 years, were divided randomly into two equal groups. The control group received a conventional physical therapy program, while the intervention group received the same program plus loaded gait training 3 times per week for an hour for 3 months.
Gross motor functions were measured by the Gross Motor Function Measure Scale-88 (GMFM-88); standing and walking domains, while knee extensor strength was measured by a hand-held dynamometer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control arm
The control group (n=26) received a conventional physical therapy program.
Conventional physical therapy program
This program included active resisted strengthening exercises for pelvis girdle and lower limb muscles, stretching exercises of tight muscles of lower limbs; hip flexors, hamstrings and calf muscle, balance activities from standing and walking and gait training exercises.
Intervention arm
The intervention group (n=26) received conventional physical therapy program and loaded gait training.
Conventional physical therapy program
This program included active resisted strengthening exercises for pelvis girdle and lower limb muscles, stretching exercises of tight muscles of lower limbs; hip flexors, hamstrings and calf muscle, balance activities from standing and walking and gait training exercises.
Loaded gait training
An extra weight was added around the distal legs during gait training in the intervention group. This weight began at 0.5 kg and was gradually increased every two weeks to a maximum of 2 kg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional physical therapy program
This program included active resisted strengthening exercises for pelvis girdle and lower limb muscles, stretching exercises of tight muscles of lower limbs; hip flexors, hamstrings and calf muscle, balance activities from standing and walking and gait training exercises.
Loaded gait training
An extra weight was added around the distal legs during gait training in the intervention group. This weight began at 0.5 kg and was gradually increased every two weeks to a maximum of 2 kg
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Spasticity grade from 1+ to 2 based on the Modified Ashworth scale.
* Able to understand and follow verbal commands and instructions (with a score above 80 on the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale).
Exclusion Criteria
* Brain tumours.
* Musculoskeletal dysfunction that would interfere with our intervention (e.g. tightness of the posterior knee joint capsule that causes passive knee extension lag, or fixed contracture of the knee joint).
* Surgical intervention in the lower limbs within the preceding 12 months.
* Botulinum toxin injections in lower limb muscles within the last six months.
5 Years
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amina Awad,PhD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Radwa S Abdul-Rahman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Giza, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T.REC/012/002489
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.