The Socioeconomic Status and Child Characteristics on the Physical Therapy Outcome in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT04160403
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-06
2019-12-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Rebound Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
NCT04712708
Effect of Core Stability Excercises Program on Reaching in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT05316090
Role of Dynamic Movement Intervention in Children with Spastic Diplegia
NCT06270550
UNIVERSAL EXERCISE UNIT and REBOUND THERAPY ON GENU RECURVATUM Cerebral Palsy Childeren
NCT07008521
Multisensory Environment Stimulation Therapy on Postural Control in Cerebral Palsy
NCT06721663
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The 83 selected children were evaluated as follow:
1. Muscle tone assessment Modified Ashworth scale is a valid and reliable test for measure muscle tone (Mutlu, 2008) table 1. Then evaluate the tone distribution throughout the body to determine its type diplegia, quadriplegia, or hemiplegia.
2. Severity The gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) is a reliable and valid system to classify the children with CP according to their age- specific motor activity (Palisano, 2000). GMFCS is a time-independent variable and it has five levels of severity (I, II, III, IV \&V). The children with level I\& II grouped as mild cases, children with level III were moderate cases, and those with IV \& V levels were sever cases.
3. The gross motor function measure The Gross motor function measure (GMFM-88) is a valid clinical assessment tool designed to evaluate gross motor function, and its change over time in children with cerebral palsy (Russell, 2013). (GMFM-88) consists of 88 items in five dimensions A: Lying and Rolling (17 items), B: Sitting (20 items), C: Crawling and Kneeling (14 items), D: Standing (13 items), and E: Walking, Running and Jumping( 24 items). Each item was scored as 0 - does not initiate, 1 - initiates, 2 - partially completes, and 3 - completed, or not tested. The GMFM total scores are a summation of the scores for all dimensions and dividing by 5. A percentage score was calculated for the total score so it ranges from 0 to 100.
4. Socioeconomic status (SES) SES was evaluated by a valid and updated of the socioeconomic status scale for health research in Egypt scale (El-Gilany, 2012). It includes 7 domains with a total score of 84 ; 1- education and cultural domain(for both husband \& wife) (score = 30); 2- family domain (score = 10); 3- occupation domain(for both husband \& wife) (score = 10); 4- Family possessions domain (score = 12); 5- home sanitation domain (score = 12); 6- health care domain (score = 5); 7- economic domain(score = 5). According to the quartiles of the score calculated, the socioeconomic level is classified into very low, low, middle and high levels.
Physical therapy program The trained physiotherapists did the physical therapy interventions based on neurodevelopmental technique (NDT) and strength training for all participated children in the study for three times per week along sex months. During the study, the parents were asked to be adhering to the sessions Follow up After 6 months of the physical therapy program, the GMFM88 for 80 children were evaluated again to determine the progress of motor functions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
factors ( SES,age, sex,severity) and progress
the relation between progress in gross motor functions
physical therapy intervention
NDT bases on neuroplasticity by which the brain change and reorganize itself and its processes according to practice and experience by a) facilitation of normal postural alignment and movement patterns; b) inhibition of the involvement during developmental and functional activities; and c) using sensory feedback (manual contact, visual integration, somatosensory reinforcement) for recovering function
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
physical therapy intervention
NDT bases on neuroplasticity by which the brain change and reorganize itself and its processes according to practice and experience by a) facilitation of normal postural alignment and movement patterns; b) inhibition of the involvement during developmental and functional activities; and c) using sensory feedback (manual contact, visual integration, somatosensory reinforcement) for recovering function
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
4 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Zeinab Hussein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zeinab Hussein
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
zeinab hussein
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
pediatric physical therapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zeinab Hussein
Cairo, Dokki, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, et al. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34(6):547-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar 2. Reeuwijk A, Van Schie PEM, Becher JG, et al. Effects of botulinum toxin type A on upper limb functions in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(5):375-87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. 3. El-Tallawy, H. N., Farghaly, W. M., Shehata, G. A., Rageh, T. A., Metwally, N. A., Badry, R., … Kandil, M. R.. Cerebral palsy in Al-Quseir City, Egypt: prevalence, subtypes, and risk factors. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2014; 10, 1267-1272. 5- O'Shea TM, Preisser JS, Klinepeter KL, et al. Trends in mortality and cerebral palsy in a geographically based cohort of very low birth weight neonates born between1982 to 1994. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4 pt 1):642-[PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6- Shamsoddini AR, Hollisaz MT. Effect of sensory integration therapy on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Iran J Child Neurology. 2009;3(1):43- 8. [Google Scholar] 7- McCullough N, Parkes J, Kerr C, McDowell BC(2013): The health of children and young people with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal, population-based study. Int J Nurs Stud. 50(6):747-756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8- O'Shea, T. M. (2008). Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cerebral palsy in near-term/term infants. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 51(4), 816. 9- Saifi, S., & Mehmood, T. (2011). Effects of socio-economic status on students achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1(2), 119-128. 10- Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., & Posner, S. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. Jama, 294(22), 2879-2888. 11- Baker, E. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society, 2210-2214. 12- Sundrum, R., Logan, S., Wallace, A., & Spencer, N. (2005). Cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status: a retrospective cohort study. Archives of disease in childhood, 90(1), 15-18. 13- Inchley, J. C., Currie, D. B., Todd, J. M., Akhtar, P. C., & Currie, C. E. (2005). Persistent socio-demographic differences in physical activity among Scottish schoolchildren 1990-2002. The European Journal of Public Health, 15(4), 386-388. 14- Myklebust G, Jahnsen R, Elkjaer S. (2009): Registration of interventions in children with cerebral palsy during three years-a population based study. [Scientific Poster Abstracts]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 51:65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03452_2.x 15- Palisano R, Begnoche DM, Chiarello LA, et al (2012): Amount and focus of physical therapy and occupational therapy for young children with cerebral palsy. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 32(4):368-82. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.715620. PubMed PMID: 22954372 16- Mutlu, A., Livanelioglu, A., & Gunel, M. K. (2008). Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 9(1), 44. 17- Palisano, R. J., Hanna, S. E., Rosenbaum, P. L., Russell, D. J., Walter, S. D., Wood, E. P., ... & Galuppi, B. E. (2000). Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical therapy, 80(10), 974-985. 18- WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. (World HealthOrganization. 19- Law,M., & Darrah, J. (2014). Emerging therapy approaches: An emphasis on function. Journal of ChildNeurology, 29(8), 1101-1107. doi:10.1177/0883073814533151 20- Anttila, H., Autti-Rämö, I., Suoranta, J., Mäkelä, M., & Malmivaara, A. (2008). Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. BMC pediatrics, 8(1), 14. 21- Russell, D. J., Rosenbaum, P. L., Wright, M., & Avery, L. M. (2013). Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) User's Manual. High Holborn, UK, Mac Keith Press. 22- El-Gilany, A., El-Wehady, A., & El-Wasify, M. (2012). Updating and validation of the socioeconomic status scale for health research in Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 18(9). 23- Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2), 1-5. 24- Malik, F., & Marwaha, R. (2018). Development, Stages of Social Emotional Development In Children. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Study Protocol
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
selection of children
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T.REC/012/001761
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.