THE EFFECTS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY ON CORMACK-LEHANE AND POGO SCORES

NCT ID: NCT06327958

Last Updated: 2024-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-15

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is a conventional and highly difficult method that is used in endotracheal intubation (ETI) training. Today, the usage of video-laryngoscopes (VLs) to teach airway management to inexperienced healthcare personnel is a prevalent practice. In ETI training, it is recommended to train students on simulators before allowing them direct access to patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Being a 5th Year Student at the Faculty of Medicine No Previous Laryngoscopy Experience

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: McGRATH-MAC Videolaryngoscope,

Cormack-Lehane (C\&L) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores in the airway management training of medical students.

Cormack-Lehane (C&L)

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

POGO score

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

Group 2: C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy

Cormack-Lehane (C\&L) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores in the airway management training of medical students.

Cormack-Lehane (C&L)

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

POGO score

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

Group 3: Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Cormack-Lehane (C\&L) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores in the airway management training of medical students.

Cormack-Lehane (C&L)

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

POGO score

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cormack-Lehane (C&L)

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

Intervention Type OTHER

POGO score

There is no distinguishing feature of the C\&L and POGO scores required to provide the best laryngoscopic view from other interventions in this or any other clinical trial.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students who were informed,
* whose informed consent was received were invited to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Students who were experienced in laryngoscopy,
* those who had received relevant training,
* those who had watched videos on the subject,
* those who refused to participate were excluded.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gamze Küçükosman

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University

Zonguldak, Kozlu, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

protocol Number: 2021/21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes
NCT06649526 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING