Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
263 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-16
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Added Value of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography, CESM. A Pilot Study.
NCT03402529
Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Breast Cancer Screening
NCT04904757
Comparison of Breast Cancer Screening With CESM to DBT in Women With Dense Breasts
NCT05625659
Can Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce the Number of Benign Biopsies for Calcifications Without Negatively Impacting on Detection/Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Calcifications
NCT03857152
Contrast-Enhanced Stereotactic Biopsy
NCT06062992
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Improvement in survival and quality of life of patients with breast malignancies depends on the ability of imaging to diagnose the neoplasm in its early stages.
The main focus of imaging applied to the study of the breast is to obtain a good balance between the number of false positives and false negatives in the prediction of malignancy: good diagnostic performance should be achieved in identifying even small and insidious neoplasms without requiring excessive examinations for benign findings.
The main diagnostic method of screening for breast malignancy still remains mammography also considering its quick execution and low cost: however as is well known the diagnostic performance of mammography is highly impaired, in patients with dense breasts. The reduced sensitivity of mammography in women with dense breasts can result in a significant underdiagnosis rate, failing to prevent death due to breast cancer in a non-negligible number of women. The sensitivity of mammography is reported in the literature as between 62-68% in dense breasts: such performance is far too low to ensure adequate support in the management of breast malignancy; supplemental screening should be recommended in women with dense breasts.
For this purpose, a diagnostic technique called contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has been developed in recent years: CEM is based on the use of an iodinated contrast medium to assess the vascularity of any breast lesions and its first use was approved in 2011 by the food and drug administration (FDA).
The diagnostic performance of CEM in detecting and predicting the malignancy of breast lesions has been evaluated in many studies that have shown very promising result: CEM seems to provide excellent performance, particularly where conventional diagnostic methods seem to be struggling: the low sensitivity of mammography in dense breasts; the high operator dependence of breast ultrasound; the high cost, the high number of false positives and the time required to perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
The purpose of this studt is to assess the diagnostic performance of recombined CEM image, in predicting malignancy of breast lesions in a population mainly represented by patients with dense breasts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Patients underwent Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histological assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* The subject has breasts too large to be adequately positioned on Full field digital mammography (FFDM) digital receptor without anatomical cut off during an FFDM examination
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Institute of Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Enrico Cassano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
European Institute of Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Luca Nicosia, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IEO 960
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.