Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM)

NCT ID: NCT06311695

Last Updated: 2024-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

263 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-16

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study's objective is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) , considering as reference the classification obtained with Vacuum Assisted Breast Biopsy (VABB).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death from malignancy.

Improvement in survival and quality of life of patients with breast malignancies depends on the ability of imaging to diagnose the neoplasm in its early stages.

The main focus of imaging applied to the study of the breast is to obtain a good balance between the number of false positives and false negatives in the prediction of malignancy: good diagnostic performance should be achieved in identifying even small and insidious neoplasms without requiring excessive examinations for benign findings.

The main diagnostic method of screening for breast malignancy still remains mammography also considering its quick execution and low cost: however as is well known the diagnostic performance of mammography is highly impaired, in patients with dense breasts. The reduced sensitivity of mammography in women with dense breasts can result in a significant underdiagnosis rate, failing to prevent death due to breast cancer in a non-negligible number of women. The sensitivity of mammography is reported in the literature as between 62-68% in dense breasts: such performance is far too low to ensure adequate support in the management of breast malignancy; supplemental screening should be recommended in women with dense breasts.

For this purpose, a diagnostic technique called contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has been developed in recent years: CEM is based on the use of an iodinated contrast medium to assess the vascularity of any breast lesions and its first use was approved in 2011 by the food and drug administration (FDA).

The diagnostic performance of CEM in detecting and predicting the malignancy of breast lesions has been evaluated in many studies that have shown very promising result: CEM seems to provide excellent performance, particularly where conventional diagnostic methods seem to be struggling: the low sensitivity of mammography in dense breasts; the high operator dependence of breast ultrasound; the high cost, the high number of false positives and the time required to perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

The purpose of this studt is to assess the diagnostic performance of recombined CEM image, in predicting malignancy of breast lesions in a population mainly represented by patients with dense breasts.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Patients underwent Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Contrast Enhanced Mammography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with breast lesions, who underwent bilateral CEM
* Histological assessment

Exclusion Criteria

* The subject is known to have risks of adverse effects with iodine contrast agents
* The subject has breasts too large to be adequately positioned on Full field digital mammography (FFDM) digital receptor without anatomical cut off during an FFDM examination
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Enrico Cassano, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS

Milan, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Enrico Cassano, MD

Role: CONTACT

+390257489410

Luca Nicosia

Role: CONTACT

+390257489410

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luca Nicosia, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEO 960

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.