Reduced Contrast Administration in Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM)

NCT ID: NCT03008031

Last Updated: 2022-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The optimal dose of iodine based contrast agents used in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is unknown. If CESM, performed with lower dose of iodine based contrast agent, visualizes a tumor comparable to CESM with regular dose of contrast agent, patients can receive less contrast agent for CESM in future and thereby risking less side effects of the contrast agent.

In order to study whether CESM remains unchanged at smaller amounts of contrast administration, a second CESM exam will be performed within one week of the first with a an alternative amount of contrast, it being either 80%, 60% or 40% of the original contrast dose. The settings of the CESM unit will remain unchanged.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Neoplasm Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

arm A (40%)

Patients randomized in arm A will receive a second CESM exam with 40% of the initial dose of the contrast agent.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CESM with a reduced dose of contrast agent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arm B (60%)

Patients randomized in arm A will receive a second CESM exam with 60% of the initial dose of the contrast agent.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CESM with a reduced dose of contrast agent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arm C (80%)

Patients randomized in arm A will receive a second CESM exam with 80% of the initial dose of the contrast agent.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CESM with a reduced dose of contrast agent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CESM with a reduced dose of contrast agent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patient with histopathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who recently underwent a clinical CESM exam without complications;
* Treated with primary surgery;
* Willing and able to undergo all study procedures;
* Has personally provided written informed consent.
* Age ≥ 18

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Allergy for any of the ingredients of (Ultravist) contrast agent
* Being unable to give informed consent in person
* History of coronary arterial disease or unstable angina
* Acute or chronic severe renal insufficiency
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc BI Lobbes, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Thiemo JA van Nijnatten, MD, PhD

Role:

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

162048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.