CEM to Reduce Biopsy Rates for Less Than Highly Suspicious Breast Abnormalities: a Prospective Study

NCT ID: NCT05206331

Last Updated: 2025-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2027-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One of the primary criticisms of mammography is that it leads to unneeded stress and anxiety from identification and biopsy of non-cancerous findings. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has the potential to significantly reduce biopsy rates for commonly seen benign breast lesions while preserving very high cancer detection. The investigators propose a prospective clinical study of patients with diagnostic mammograms rated as BIRADS 4A or 4B and scheduled for a biopsy, in which, prior to undergoing their scheduled biopsy, a CEM procedure is performed. The investigators will test the primary hypothesis that for soft tissue lesions (i.e. masses, asymmetries, architectural distortions) initially rated BI-RADS 4A/4B adding CEM will reduce, by at least 20%, the number of biopsy recommendations for actually benign cases and, at the same time, provide a negative predictive value (NPV) higher than 95%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators believe that an operationally simple, cost effective, contrast enhanced mammogram (CEM), performed during the patient's diagnostic evaluation, would be the best approach to improve the accuracy of radiologists' decisions for need to biopsy lesions classified with mammography, tomosynthesis (DBT) or ultrasound as 4A or 4B. CEM uses iodine contrast with dual low and high KeV mammogram images to create a contrast enhancement map of the breast that directly overlays the mammogram, thus providing anatomic and kinetic information, similar to MRI. The investigators found in a preliminary clinical trial that radiologists had higher true-positive rates and lower false-positive rates for biopsy recommendation with CEM than when using DBT and ultrasound. To validate those initial findings, the investigators propose to prospectively and sequentially perform CEM on 1855 consenting women with BIRADS 4A or 4B lesions detected on mammography, DBT or ultrasound. Prospectively radiologists will provide BIRADS ratings for every lesion using DBT alone, then with ultrasound and finally with CEM. With pathology known and based on the study design to minimize case by radiologist potential biases, the investigators plan to estimate the NPV level of CEM-based recommendations (overall and within the cases with conventionally confirmed biopsy recommendation) and demonstrate that it is sufficiently high, while leading to substantial reduction in biopsy recommendations for actually benign lesions. The investigators primary expectation is that the number of recommendations to biopsy benign lesions will decrease significantly (\~20%), while maintaining high NPV (\>95%) among the initial recommendations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

eligible participants will have contrast enhanced mammography before their scheduled biopsy
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

contrast enhanced mammography

Women who have been recently diagnosed with a suspicious abnormality for which they have scheduled a breast biopsy and meet inclusion criteria will be invited to have a contrast enhanced mammography before their scheduled biopsy procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

contrast enhanced mammography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dual-energy contrast images; low-energy CEM images will be obtained with a kilovoltage below 35 kVp while the high-energy images will be obtained with 45-49 kVp.The average glandular dose of the CEM procedure is approximately 2.44 mGy per view

Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM)

Intervention Type DRUG

standard FDA-approved low osmolarity Iodine contrast agent with 350-370 mg/ml

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

contrast enhanced mammography

Dual-energy contrast images; low-energy CEM images will be obtained with a kilovoltage below 35 kVp while the high-energy images will be obtained with 45-49 kVp.The average glandular dose of the CEM procedure is approximately 2.44 mGy per view

Intervention Type DEVICE

Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM)

standard FDA-approved low osmolarity Iodine contrast agent with 350-370 mg/ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is female of any race and ethnicity
* Subject is ≥30 years old
* Subject is diagnosed with a suspicious breast abnormality and is scheduled for an imaging directed breast biopsy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo informed consent
* Subject has a breast implant in the breast of interest
* Subject is pregnant
* Subject is breast-feeding
* Subject is actively being treated for cancer of any type with chemotherapy
* Subject has reduced kidney function with eGFR \< 30.
* Subject has had a prior reaction to iodinated contrast; thus a known allergy to iodinated contrast
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Margarita Louise Zuley

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Margarita Louise Zuley

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Margarita L Zuley, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Suzanne Burdin, BS

Role: CONTACT

412-647-7385

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Suzanne Burdin, BS

Role: primary

412-647-7385

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA258898

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY21070030

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.