Comparison of Three Methods for Early Detection of Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03954015
Last Updated: 2022-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-15
2021-10-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging as a Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Intermediate Risk
NCT02210546
Quantitative Microvasculature Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection and Monitoring
NCT04799535
An Imaging Technology, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography, in Predicting Breast Cancer
NCT04871139
Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography to Breast MRI in Screening Patients at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer
NCT01716247
Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography vs. MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
NCT03482557
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Positive predictive value of CEDM in detecting lesions seen on MR
2. Estimate the negative predictive value (TN/(TN+FN)) of CEUS as an adjunct.
3. Compare the frequency of recommendation of biopsy of MG±US vs MG±US plus CEUS as an adjunct based on BIRADS scores.
4. Comparison of background enhancement seen on CEUS with that seen on CEDM and CEMR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients over age 30 with suspicious BIRADS 4/5 Lesions
Patients who are scheduled to undergo biopsy will be recruited to undergo imaging evaluation with CEDM, CEMR and CEUS.
Contrast Enhanced imaging
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) with US Microvessel Imaging, Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography (CEDM) and Contrast Enhanced Breast MR (CEMR): Comparison of Three Methods for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.
Lumason
FDA approved and used routinely for ultrasound exams of the heart and liver as well as the urinary tract in children. It contains microbubbles that are small enough to pass through the blood stream.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contrast Enhanced imaging
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) with US Microvessel Imaging, Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography (CEDM) and Contrast Enhanced Breast MR (CEMR): Comparison of Three Methods for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.
Lumason
FDA approved and used routinely for ultrasound exams of the heart and liver as well as the urinary tract in children. It contains microbubbles that are small enough to pass through the blood stream.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
* Patients, greater than 30 years of age
* In good general health as evidenced by medical history
* BIRADS 4 or 5 suspicious breast lesions who are scheduled for breast biopsy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have known or suspected cardiac shunts
* Have history of hypersensitive allergic reactions to any imaging contrast agents
* Pregnant (a urine pregnancy test will be given at no cost to the patient)
* Are nursing babies
* Poor renal function
* Are unwilling or unable (such as having a pacemaker) to undergo a CEMR
30 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Katrina N. Glazebrook, M.B., Ch.B.
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katrina N. Glazebrook, M.B., Ch.B.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-003544
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.