Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) to MRI in Screening High Risk Women for Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02275871

Last Updated: 2020-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is comparing Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) to MRI as a screening tool for breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research study is being done to test how well a contrast enhanced mammogram compares to MRI in screening for breast cancer in people who are at higher risk for developing breast cancer.

Standard screening mammograms can miss breast cancers due to its inability to "see through" dense breast tissue. For this reason, women at increased risk for the development of breast cancer often undergo additional screening beyond conventional mammography with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although screening MRI is very sensitive for finding breast cancer, it also finds many areas that are benign (not cancer). The only way to know which is the cancer is to perform a biopsy, which contributes to patient anxiety and leads to many unnecessary biopsies.

In the preliminary studies performed in women already diagnosed with breast cancer, contrast enhanced mammography was shown to have a similar sensitivity for finding primary breast cancer but detected fewer of the benign findings which would result in fewer unnecessary biopsies. It is also a faster and less expensive exam compared to MRI. Contrast mammography was FDA approved in 2011 and is used now as a tool to help work-up abnormalities seen on standard mammography and ultrasound.

We are now studying to see if contrast enhanced mammography will also be a beneficial tool in the screening setting to screen high risk patients for breast cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRI and CESM

High risk patients will get standard of care screening MRI and study CESM on the same day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MRI

Intervention Type OTHER

High risk screening MRI will be performed as part of the patient's routine care.

CESM

Intervention Type OTHER

After the MRI is complete, the patient will be brought to the mammography department for the contrast enhanced mammogram. The contrast enhanced mammogram will be independently interpreted by two study radiologists (randomly assigned) who are blinded to the MRI. They will then compare to the MRI to determine clinical follow-up. Any finding seen on MRI will be followed according to the MR protocol. Any finding seen on CESM only, will have a diagnostic work-up with mammography and ultrasound. If this work-up is negative, then follow-up CESM exams will be performed. Each patient will be followed for 2 years to determine sensitivity and specificity for both modalities.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI

High risk screening MRI will be performed as part of the patient's routine care.

Intervention Type OTHER

CESM

After the MRI is complete, the patient will be brought to the mammography department for the contrast enhanced mammogram. The contrast enhanced mammogram will be independently interpreted by two study radiologists (randomly assigned) who are blinded to the MRI. They will then compare to the MRI to determine clinical follow-up. Any finding seen on MRI will be followed according to the MR protocol. Any finding seen on CESM only, will have a diagnostic work-up with mammography and ultrasound. If this work-up is negative, then follow-up CESM exams will be performed. Each patient will be followed for 2 years to determine sensitivity and specificity for both modalities.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women
* Age \> or equal to 30 years
* High risk (\>20% lifetime risk)
* Has a bilateral mammogram within the last 7 months
* Has had a same day high risk screening MRI

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants who have a known allergy or contraindication to iodinated contrast.
* Participants who have a known allergy to food or medications.
* Participants who have renal insufficiency or failure.
* Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Participants with a concurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GE Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jordana Phillips, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jordana Phillips, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-225

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.