Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) to MRI in Screening High Risk Women for Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02275871
Last Updated: 2020-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography vs. MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
NCT03482557
Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography to Breast MRI in Screening Patients at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer
NCT01716247
Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Breast Cancer Screening
NCT04904757
Can Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce the Number of Benign Biopsies for Calcifications Without Negatively Impacting on Detection/Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Calcifications
NCT03857152
Comparison of Breast Cancer Screening With CESM to DBT in Women With Dense Breasts
NCT05625659
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Standard screening mammograms can miss breast cancers due to its inability to "see through" dense breast tissue. For this reason, women at increased risk for the development of breast cancer often undergo additional screening beyond conventional mammography with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although screening MRI is very sensitive for finding breast cancer, it also finds many areas that are benign (not cancer). The only way to know which is the cancer is to perform a biopsy, which contributes to patient anxiety and leads to many unnecessary biopsies.
In the preliminary studies performed in women already diagnosed with breast cancer, contrast enhanced mammography was shown to have a similar sensitivity for finding primary breast cancer but detected fewer of the benign findings which would result in fewer unnecessary biopsies. It is also a faster and less expensive exam compared to MRI. Contrast mammography was FDA approved in 2011 and is used now as a tool to help work-up abnormalities seen on standard mammography and ultrasound.
We are now studying to see if contrast enhanced mammography will also be a beneficial tool in the screening setting to screen high risk patients for breast cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MRI and CESM
High risk patients will get standard of care screening MRI and study CESM on the same day.
MRI
High risk screening MRI will be performed as part of the patient's routine care.
CESM
After the MRI is complete, the patient will be brought to the mammography department for the contrast enhanced mammogram. The contrast enhanced mammogram will be independently interpreted by two study radiologists (randomly assigned) who are blinded to the MRI. They will then compare to the MRI to determine clinical follow-up. Any finding seen on MRI will be followed according to the MR protocol. Any finding seen on CESM only, will have a diagnostic work-up with mammography and ultrasound. If this work-up is negative, then follow-up CESM exams will be performed. Each patient will be followed for 2 years to determine sensitivity and specificity for both modalities.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI
High risk screening MRI will be performed as part of the patient's routine care.
CESM
After the MRI is complete, the patient will be brought to the mammography department for the contrast enhanced mammogram. The contrast enhanced mammogram will be independently interpreted by two study radiologists (randomly assigned) who are blinded to the MRI. They will then compare to the MRI to determine clinical follow-up. Any finding seen on MRI will be followed according to the MR protocol. Any finding seen on CESM only, will have a diagnostic work-up with mammography and ultrasound. If this work-up is negative, then follow-up CESM exams will be performed. Each patient will be followed for 2 years to determine sensitivity and specificity for both modalities.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> or equal to 30 years
* High risk (\>20% lifetime risk)
* Has a bilateral mammogram within the last 7 months
* Has had a same day high risk screening MRI
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants who have a known allergy to food or medications.
* Participants who have renal insufficiency or failure.
* Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Participants with a concurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia.
30 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GE Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jordana Phillips, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jordana Phillips, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-225
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.