Non-inferiority Study of Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Terms of Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Undergoing Preoperative Staging of Established Invasive Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT07071272

Last Updated: 2025-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The general objective of the study is to verify the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) compared to breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing preoperative staging for breast neoformations that have already been diagnosed and in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

In addition to performing a preoperative breast resonance imaging, which is always performed in these patients, one contrast-enhanced mammography per patient is planned.

In patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which usually undergo MRI examination at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment, a CEM will also be acquired same way at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment.

The study requires, for the execution of the contrast-enhanced mammography exam, the administration of an iodinated contrast medium that is completely analogous to that used in computed tomography.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a monocentric, prospective, experimental non-inferiority study evaluating the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM/CEM) compared to Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment and staging of breast cancer.

MRI, recognized for its high sensitivity and three-dimensional visualization capabilities without ionizing radiation, is often used in specialized centers for detailed staging. However, it suffers from practical limitations including high cost, long exam duration (\~7-10 minutes), and cost-effective. Preliminary studies suggest its diagnostic accuracy may be comparable to, or even better than, MRI, especially regarding specificity and lesion size estimation. Furthermore, CEM can be used in patients with contraindications to MRI, including those with pacemakers, cochlear implants, or severe claustrophobia.

The study will enroll approximately 216 patients up to December 2025, divided in tho groups: 108 patients with already confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing preoperative staging; 108 patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.

CEM and MRI will be performed for all enrolled participants. Histological examination of biopsy or surgical specimens will serve as the reference standard for evaluating diagnostic performance.

The primary outcome is to determine diagnostic accuracy (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) of CEDM versus MRI, using histopathology as the gold standard. A non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 15% is defined. The non-inferiority hypothesis will be tested using paired binary outcomes, and sample size calculations for groups 1 and 2, accounting for dependent diagnostic testing.

The secondary endpoint are:

* evaluating interobserver agreement between radiologists interpreting CEDM (Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients).
* comparison of lesion size estimations and regression evaluations in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at baseline (T0), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6).

Descriptive statistics will summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. For hypothesis testing, paired comparisons will be used: Student's t-test or Wilcoxon test for continuous variables; McNemar test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Pearson correlation coefficients will assess the relationship between imaging measurements and histology. Diagnostic accuracy comparisons will assess the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval against the non-inferiority threshold.

Participants must be women over 30 years of age with a BI-RADS mammographic pattern \>1, scheduled for a diagnostic MRI and meeting one of the five group classifications. Key exclusion criteria include: breast implants, known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, contraindications to MRI, or impaired renal function (eGFR \<30 mL/min). All participants must provide informed consent.

Participants will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEDM during a scheduled visit. Imaging will be interpreted independently by two radiologists, blinded to each other's findings, with subsequent consensus reporting. Pseudonymized data will be recorded, including imaging findings, histological results, and any adverse reactions to contrast agents.

In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Participants will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEDM during a scheduled visit. Imaging will be interpreted independently by two radiologists, blinded to each other's findings, with subsequent consensus reporting. Pseudonymized data will be recorded, including imaging findings, histological results, and any adverse reactions to contrast agents.

In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients undergoing preoperative staging and patients undergoing chemotherapy

All participants in the group 1 and 2 will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEM during a scheduled visit.

In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

breast-MRI and CEM

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will undergo a breast MRI followed by CEM for local breast cancer staging

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

breast-MRI and CEM

Participants will undergo a breast MRI followed by CEM for local breast cancer staging

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women in pre-hospitalization with already established invasive breast cancer (T1-2)
* over the age of 30
* with BI-RADS mammography pattern\> 1
* Written and signed informed consent for research
* Negative history of adverse events to the use of iodinated and chelated contrast media of gadolinium
* No significant renal impairment (EGFR\> 30 mL / min within three months before administration of the iodinated contrast medium)

Exclusion Criteria

* women with breast implants
* women under the age of 30
* Any contraindication to performing the MRI exam
* Women with known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GE Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Borgo Trento, AOUI Verona

Verona, Italy, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Giuseppe Cardano, MD

Role: primary

+390458122124

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEDM-VR-2803CESC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.