Non-inferiority Study of Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Terms of Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Undergoing Preoperative Staging of Established Invasive Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT07071272
Last Updated: 2025-07-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
216 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In addition to performing a preoperative breast resonance imaging, which is always performed in these patients, one contrast-enhanced mammography per patient is planned.
In patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which usually undergo MRI examination at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment, a CEM will also be acquired same way at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment.
The study requires, for the execution of the contrast-enhanced mammography exam, the administration of an iodinated contrast medium that is completely analogous to that used in computed tomography.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of MRI and CEDM to Evaluate Treatment Response Before Surgery
NCT03070340
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography Imaging in Comparison to CE-MRI
NCT02608281
Prospective Comparison of Breast MRI vs Contrast Mammography Prior to Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT04770714
Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography(CEDM) vs Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI(CE-MRI) in Breast Cancer
NCT01970670
Digital Mammography for the Detection and Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer
NCT01086514
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
MRI, recognized for its high sensitivity and three-dimensional visualization capabilities without ionizing radiation, is often used in specialized centers for detailed staging. However, it suffers from practical limitations including high cost, long exam duration (\~7-10 minutes), and cost-effective. Preliminary studies suggest its diagnostic accuracy may be comparable to, or even better than, MRI, especially regarding specificity and lesion size estimation. Furthermore, CEM can be used in patients with contraindications to MRI, including those with pacemakers, cochlear implants, or severe claustrophobia.
The study will enroll approximately 216 patients up to December 2025, divided in tho groups: 108 patients with already confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing preoperative staging; 108 patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.
CEM and MRI will be performed for all enrolled participants. Histological examination of biopsy or surgical specimens will serve as the reference standard for evaluating diagnostic performance.
The primary outcome is to determine diagnostic accuracy (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) of CEDM versus MRI, using histopathology as the gold standard. A non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 15% is defined. The non-inferiority hypothesis will be tested using paired binary outcomes, and sample size calculations for groups 1 and 2, accounting for dependent diagnostic testing.
The secondary endpoint are:
* evaluating interobserver agreement between radiologists interpreting CEDM (Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients).
* comparison of lesion size estimations and regression evaluations in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at baseline (T0), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6).
Descriptive statistics will summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. For hypothesis testing, paired comparisons will be used: Student's t-test or Wilcoxon test for continuous variables; McNemar test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Pearson correlation coefficients will assess the relationship between imaging measurements and histology. Diagnostic accuracy comparisons will assess the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval against the non-inferiority threshold.
Participants must be women over 30 years of age with a BI-RADS mammographic pattern \>1, scheduled for a diagnostic MRI and meeting one of the five group classifications. Key exclusion criteria include: breast implants, known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, contraindications to MRI, or impaired renal function (eGFR \<30 mL/min). All participants must provide informed consent.
Participants will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEDM during a scheduled visit. Imaging will be interpreted independently by two radiologists, blinded to each other's findings, with subsequent consensus reporting. Pseudonymized data will be recorded, including imaging findings, histological results, and any adverse reactions to contrast agents.
In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients undergoing preoperative staging and patients undergoing chemotherapy
All participants in the group 1 and 2 will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEM during a scheduled visit.
In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.
breast-MRI and CEM
Participants will undergo a breast MRI followed by CEM for local breast cancer staging
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
breast-MRI and CEM
Participants will undergo a breast MRI followed by CEM for local breast cancer staging
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* over the age of 30
* with BI-RADS mammography pattern\> 1
* Written and signed informed consent for research
* Negative history of adverse events to the use of iodinated and chelated contrast media of gadolinium
* No significant renal impairment (EGFR\> 30 mL / min within three months before administration of the iodinated contrast medium)
Exclusion Criteria
* women under the age of 30
* Any contraindication to performing the MRI exam
* Women with known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation
30 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GE Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale Borgo Trento, AOUI Verona
Verona, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEDM-VR-2803CESC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.