Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer and Dense Breast Tissue: Benefit?

NCT ID: NCT06993246

Last Updated: 2025-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-15

Study Completion Date

2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)as an alternative to traditional ultrasound for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts and a personal history of breast cancer. CEM combines standard mammography with a contrast agent to better detect tumors, particularly in women with dense tissue where traditional mammograms may miss signs of cancer. The study will compare CEM with ultrasound and MRI to determine its accuracy in detecting cancer, reduce wait times for screening, and provide a more affordable option than MRI. Women who participate will have their screening done in one visit, improving convenience and access. The study will track cancer detection rates, biopsy results, and patient satisfaction over two years to evaluate the benefits of CEM for early breast cancer detection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Outcome Measure: 1. Detection Rate of Breast Cancer The primary outcome measure is the detection rate of breast cancer in women with dense breast tissue using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of CEM in detecting malignancies will be compared to conventional mammography and ultrasound.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The study follows a \*\*prospective cohort design\*\*, where eligible participants are recruited and followed over time to evaluate the outcomes of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in comparison to traditional screening methods like ultrasound and MRI. Participants are women aged 50-69 years with dense breast tissue and a personal history of breast cancer. They will undergo CEM as part of their routine screening process. The study aims to assess key outcomes, including cancer detection rates, biopsy results, patient acceptance, and screening wait times. Data will be collected on screening outcomes, including abnormal interpretation rates, positive predictive values, and follow-up results over two years. The study also compares the performance of CEM with historical data from previous screening modalities.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

There are no additional parties masked in this clinical trial. The study is open-label, meaning that participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors are all aware of the intervention being performed (Contrast-Enhanced Mammography). No masking of roles is applied in this study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

**Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening**

This arm involves participants undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) as a supplemental screening method for breast cancer. CEM combines standard mammography with iodinated contrast medium to improve lesion visualization and tumor detection, particularly in women with dense breast tissue. Participants will receive CEM during a single visit at the Rose Ages Breast Health Centre, and their results will be evaluated for cancer detection, abnormal interpretation rates, and biopsy outcomes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The intervention involves the use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to supplement standard mammography for breast cancer screening. This method utilizes iodinated contrast medium to enhance the visualization of breast lesions by assessing tumor neovascularization. CEM will be offered to women with dense breast tissue who are currently awaiting supplemental ultrasound screening. It is designed to be performed in conjunction with regular mammography, offering a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to MRI, with comparable sensitivity in detecting breast cancer. Participants will undergo the CEM procedure in a single visit, allowing for reduced wait times and improved detection rates compared to traditional methods. The procedure is well-tolerated, with minimal side effects, and provides a quicker and more accessible option for supplemental breast cancer screening.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)

The intervention involves the use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to supplement standard mammography for breast cancer screening. This method utilizes iodinated contrast medium to enhance the visualization of breast lesions by assessing tumor neovascularization. CEM will be offered to women with dense breast tissue who are currently awaiting supplemental ultrasound screening. It is designed to be performed in conjunction with regular mammography, offering a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to MRI, with comparable sensitivity in detecting breast cancer. Participants will undergo the CEM procedure in a single visit, allowing for reduced wait times and improved detection rates compared to traditional methods. The procedure is well-tolerated, with minimal side effects, and provides a quicker and more accessible option for supplemental breast cancer screening.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women presenting at Rose Ages Breast Health Center, who are currently waiting for supplemental screening Ultrasound, according to pre-established guidelines at TOH for supplemental screening.
* Women ages 50-69 years of age
* Those willing to participate in the study, sign an informed consent and undergo IV iodinated contrast injection
* Women with dense breasts (category C or D) and normal mammograms (BI-RADS 1 or 2)
* No evidence of renal disease

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with renal insufficiency (reduced eGFR \<20ml/min)
* Previous allergic reactions to Iodine-based contrast.
* Prior contrast allergy (CT contrast)
* Thyroid Disease
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc./Bayer Schering Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jean Seely

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jean Seely

Physician Medical Imaging

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Jean Seely Principal Investigator,, MD FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Jean Seely Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, MD, FRCPC, MD, FRCPC

Role: CONTACT

613-737-8899 ext. Ext. 73665

Dr. Betty Anne Schwarz, Director of Research Services, DProf, RN BA MSc

Role: CONTACT

613-798-5555 ext. Ext. 17522

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr. Jean Seely Principal Investigator, MD FRCPC

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OHSN- REB 20240828-01H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial
NCT02616432 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA