Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge
NCT ID: NCT05056844
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-15
2027-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) for Women With Palpable Breast Abnormalities
NCT02406274
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for the Evaluation of Mammographic Microcalcifications
NCT05046301
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Staging in Patients Referred for a Second Opinion
NCT05036083
An Imaging Technology, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography, in Predicting Breast Cancer
NCT04871139
Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography to Assess Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response (CEDM)
NCT04625517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To evaluate the added sensitivity of contrast enhancement of CESM (represented by the subtracted contrast images of CESM) compared to low energy \[LE\] images of CESM (full field digital mammogram \[FFDM\] equivalent) in detecting the causative lesion (invasive malignancy, ductal carcinoma in situ \[DCIS\], atypia, or papilloma) in patients with pathologic nipple discharge (PND).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of CESM versus DBT and ultrasound (US) in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS in patients with PND.
II. To compare the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and LE in the detection of invasive malignancy or DCIS, as well as in the detection of the causative lesion.
III. To estimate the proportion of cases in which CESM affects the choice of the lesion targeted for a biopsy with any imaging modality.
IV. To evaluate the cancer detection rate and the outcomes (need for additional imaging, biopsies, and final pathologic results) of incidental CESM findings.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the correlation of blood biomarkers and the presence of invasive cancer and DCIS on pathology in the study patients.
II. To evaluate the role of the CESM enhancement pattern in choosing a precise target for a stereotactic biopsy.
III. To evaluate the effect of CESM on the patient workflow by calculating the time from presentation to the definitive diagnosis.
IV. To evaluate the technical feasibility of using CESM- guided or CESM directed biopsies.
V. In patients who undergo a CESM targeted or CESM directed biopsy we will evaluate the upgrade rate of DCIS to invasive malignancy or high-risk lesions to in-situ or invasive cancer for those patients who will require surgery as a part of their routine clinical care.
VI. In those study patients who undergo breast MRI as a part of their clinical care, the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CESM for the detection of causative lesions will be compared.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive iodine-based contrast agent intravenously (IV) then undergo CESM over 10-15 minutes. Patients who have not undergone standard of care DBT within 3 months from the study, also undergo DBT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Diagnostic (CESM, DBT)
Patients receive iodine-based contrast agent IV then undergo CESM over 10-15 minutes. Patients who have not undergone standard of care DBT within 3 months from the study, also undergo DBT.
Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography
Undergo CESM
Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
Undergo DBT
Iodinated Contrast Agent
Given iodine-based contrast agent IV
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography
Undergo CESM
Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
Undergo DBT
Iodinated Contrast Agent
Given iodine-based contrast agent IV
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 25-85 years
* Willing to participate in the study and undergo an IV placement, able to undergo iodinated contrast injection, and able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* History of anaphylactic reaction to any substance in the absence of a prior history of uneventful administration of iodine-based IV contrast.
* Renal insufficiency
* Pregnancy or lactation within 6 months
* Breast surgery affecting the symptomatic breast within prior 6 months, if it was located within 5 cm from the nipple
* Breast biopsy of the symptomatic breast within the last 2 months, if it was located within 5 cm from the nipple
* Breast MRI performed within 24 months before the patient presented with qualifying symptoms (MRI performed contemporarily with CEM for the evaluation of new symptoms is not an exclusion criterion).
* Known breast cancer or active inflammatory process (such as abscess or mastitis) in the breast of concern
25 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olena Weaver, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2021-07594
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2021-0025
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2021-0025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.