Impact of Single- Versus Double-layer Hysterotomy Closure on Cesarean Niche Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT06308172
Last Updated: 2024-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgical Incision Closure Method to Prevent Niche Formation After Cesarean Section- Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04766073
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524
Comparison of Uterine Repair Methods for Cesarean Delivery
NCT02587013
Niche In CEsarean Scar Trial (NICEST)
NCT05312775
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04871022
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent well-designed randomized controlled trials have investigated the long-term outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure during C-sections. These studies found no significant differences in isthmocele incidence or intermenstrual spotting. However, limitations such as the lack of correlation between symptom severity and uterine defect dimensions, the inclusion of women in labor, and relatively short follow-up periods are acknowledged weaknesses, prompting the need for further analysis.
Our objective is to compare the outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure in terms of intermenstrual spotting and isthmocele incidence in singleton women undergoing elective C-sections. Crucially, standardizing the surgical suturing technique is essential to mitigate potential misleading outcomes resulting from inter-operator variations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single-layer
Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a single layer-hysterotomy closure
Hysterotomy closure
Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.
Double-layer
Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a double layer-hysterotomy closure
Hysterotomy closure
Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hysterotomy closure
Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* singleton
* age 18-45
* spontaneous pregnancy or autologous assisted fertilization
* gestational age 38-40 weeks
* elective C-section
* informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* autoimmune diseases
* gestational diabetes
* anticoagulant therapy
* immunosuppressive therapy
* endometriosis
* uterine fibromatosis
* spontaneous labour
* connective tissue diseases
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Perugino, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ospedale Policlinico Maggiore Ca' Granda Milano
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione Cà Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano
Milan, Mi, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hegde CV. The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):239-40. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0573-9. Epub 2014 Jul 23. No abstract available.
Qayum K, Kar I, Sofi J, Panneerselvam H. Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2021 Sep 30;13(9):e18405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18405. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Marchand GJ, Masoud A, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Christensen A, Sainz K. Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 24;18(4):322-332. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.71173.
Verberkt C, Stegwee SI, Van der Voet LF, Van Baal WM, Kapiteijn K, Geomini PMAJ, Van Eekelen R, de Groot CJM, de Leeuw RA, Huirne JAF; 2Close study group. Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):346.e1-346.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.032. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
Budny-Winska J, Zimmer-Stelmach A, Pomorski M. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jan;31(1):41-48. doi: 10.17219/acem/142519.
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):578-583. doi: 10.1002/uog.17401. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CSI/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.