Impact of Single- Versus Double-layer Hysterotomy Closure on Cesarean Niche Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT06308172

Last Updated: 2024-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this randomized monocentric study is to assess potential variations in the incidence and severity of isthmocele morbidity among women undergoing cesarean section with either single or double-layer closure of the hysterotomy. Our primary outcome aims to investigate whether there is a reduction in the median duration of intermenstrual spotting in patients belonging to the two respective closure groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cesarean section, the most widely performed surgical procedure globally, has seen a significant increase in rates over the past decades, rising from 12.1% in 2000 to 21% in 2015 for various reasons. A recognized complication of cesarean sections is the formation of a uterine niche, commonly referred to as isthmocele. However, the true incidence of this post-operative complication remains uncertain, with reported figures ranging widely from 7% to 80%. The considerable variability in these estimates is attributed in part to the varying sensitivity of diagnostic tools. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the definition of a cesarean niche, particularly concerning the dimensions of the defect.

Recent well-designed randomized controlled trials have investigated the long-term outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure during C-sections. These studies found no significant differences in isthmocele incidence or intermenstrual spotting. However, limitations such as the lack of correlation between symptom severity and uterine defect dimensions, the inclusion of women in labor, and relatively short follow-up periods are acknowledged weaknesses, prompting the need for further analysis.

Our objective is to compare the outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure in terms of intermenstrual spotting and isthmocele incidence in singleton women undergoing elective C-sections. Crucially, standardizing the surgical suturing technique is essential to mitigate potential misleading outcomes resulting from inter-operator variations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section; Dehiscence Uterine Bleeding Uterus; Scar Uterus Abnormal Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Patients are recruited and randomly assigned to either the "single-layer" or "double-layer" arm of the study. The randomization process occurs on the day of the cesarean section. Following randomization, patients are informed about their assigned group, and the cesarean section procedure is then carried out.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-layer

Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a single layer-hysterotomy closure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hysterotomy closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.

Double-layer

Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a double layer-hysterotomy closure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hysterotomy closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hysterotomy closure

Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* nulliparous
* singleton
* age 18-45
* spontaneous pregnancy or autologous assisted fertilization
* gestational age 38-40 weeks
* elective C-section
* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* coagulopathy
* autoimmune diseases
* gestational diabetes
* anticoagulant therapy
* immunosuppressive therapy
* endometriosis
* uterine fibromatosis
* spontaneous labour
* connective tissue diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Perugino, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ospedale Policlinico Maggiore Ca' Granda Milano

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Cà Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano

Milan, Mi, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Giuseppe Perugino, MD

Role: CONTACT

3383030553 ext. +39

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Giuseppe Perugino, MD

Role: primary

3383030553

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hegde CV. The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):239-40. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0573-9. Epub 2014 Jul 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25136167 (View on PubMed)

Qayum K, Kar I, Sofi J, Panneerselvam H. Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2021 Sep 30;13(9):e18405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18405. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34729282 (View on PubMed)

Marchand GJ, Masoud A, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Christensen A, Sainz K. Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 24;18(4):322-332. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.71173.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34955322 (View on PubMed)

Verberkt C, Stegwee SI, Van der Voet LF, Van Baal WM, Kapiteijn K, Geomini PMAJ, Van Eekelen R, de Groot CJM, de Leeuw RA, Huirne JAF; 2Close study group. Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):346.e1-346.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.032. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38154502 (View on PubMed)

Budny-Winska J, Zimmer-Stelmach A, Pomorski M. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jan;31(1):41-48. doi: 10.17219/acem/142519.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34738347 (View on PubMed)

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):578-583. doi: 10.1002/uog.17401. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28070914 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSI/2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.