Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT ID: NCT01289262
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01287611
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04871022
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018
Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.
NCT04799457
Uterine Closure for Cesarean Section: a Novel Technique
NCT05669300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Women will be followed for a subsequent pregnancy in the next average 6 years. If they become pregnant again they will be followed up during pregnancy for comparison of long-term effects of the two suture techniques. Patients will be followed especially from the aspects of placental anomalies. Presence of intra-abdominal adhesions, uterine dehiscence, placenta previa, placental invasion anomalies (eg, placenta accreta and others)and incomplete or complete rupture will be compared between two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Purse string closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture.
Purse string closure technique
Uterine incision will be closed with purse string closure technique.
Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique.
Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Purse string closure technique
Uterine incision will be closed with purse string closure technique.
Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Term (\> 37 weeks) pregnancy
* Cervical dilatation \< 4 cm
* Kerr incision
* Age \> 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency situations (fetal distress, cord prolapse, placental abruption,severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, vasa previa )
* Having a history of uterine surgery (myomectomy, hysterotomy) other than CS
* Extension of Kerr incision
* Multiple pregnancy
* Maternal diabetes mellitus
* Maternal connective tissue disease
* Uterine malformation
* Uterine fibroids on Kerr incision line
* Chorioamnionitis
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Cem Turan
Chief Clinical
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cem Turan
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Health Institutes of Turkey ISTANBUL, TURKEY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Institutes of Turkey ISTANBUL, TURKEY
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Turan C. Long-term follow-up of purse-string double-layer closure (Turan technique) for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jan;6(1):101212. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101212. Epub 2023 Nov 2. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21.01.2011-02 (02)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Kartal2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.