Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure

NCT ID: NCT01287611

Last Updated: 2023-09-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cesarean section (C/S) is an operation most commonly performed in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. Complications related with incomplete healing of Kerr uterine incision after C/S (adhesions, separation (dehiscence), endometritis, endometriosis, anomalous placentation in subsequent pregnancies, incomplete or complete uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies, ...) are very important issues. Classically Kerr incision is repaired with continuous locked suturing. Purse string suturing of Kerr incision may reduce the size of the incision and in turn may reduce short and long term complications. For this reason, the investigators aimed to compare two closure techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the clinic, patients undergoing cesarean section that meet the criteria for inclusion into the study and agreed to participate in the study will be randomized into two groups (computer-assisted randomization method will be used.) In the first group of patients classical closure method of Kerr incision (double layered continuously locked suturing) will be used. In the second group of patients double layered purse string closure technique will be used. The two groups will be compared after 6 weeks in terms of healing, operation time, blood loss, incision size and incisional scar defect( if present). A physician who does not know the method of closure will evaluate incision size by transabdominal and/or transvaginal ultrasound. The length of the incision and myometrial thickness in Kerr incisional line will be measured and recorded in longitudinal and transverse axis separately. If any incisional scar defect is determined it will be measured and recorded also.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Purse string closure technique

Eighty four patients were allocated to the study group. Due to expanded Kerr incisions 4 patients in study group did not receive their allocated intervention. In addition, 29 patients in the study group were lost to follow up and did not come to the sixth week check up. Statistical analysis is based on data from the remaining 51 study group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Purse string closure technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture

Continuously locked closure technique

Eighty four patients were allocated to the control group. Due to expanded Kerr incisions 3 patients in control group did not receive their allocated intervention. In addition, 16 patients in the control group were lost to follow up and did not come to the sixth week check up. Statistical analysis is based on data from the remaining 65 study group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuously locked closure technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked suturing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Purse string closure technique

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuously locked closure technique

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked suturing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Uterine incision in C/S Uterine incision in C/S

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Singleton pregnancy
* Term (\> 37 weeks) pregnancy
* Cervical dilatation \< 4 cm
* Kerr incision
* Age \> 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Being in active phase of labor
* Emergency situations (fetal distress, cord prolapse, placental abruption,severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, vasa previa )
* Having a history of uterine surgery (myomectomy, hysterotomy)other than C/S
* Extension of Kerr incision
* Multiple pregnancy
* Maternal diabetes mellitus
* Maternal connective tissue disease
* Uterine malformation
* Uterine fibroids on Kerr incision line
* Chorioamnionitis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehmet Cem Turan

Chief Clinical

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yasemin Karsidağ

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Kartal, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Turan C, Buyukbayrak EE, Yilmaz AO, Karsidag YK, Pirimoglu M. Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/jog.12593. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25370526 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21.01.2011-02(1)

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Kartal1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3