Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT ID: NCT01287611
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04871022
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018
Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.
NCT04799457
Uterine Closure for Cesarean Section: a Novel Technique
NCT05669300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Purse string closure technique
Eighty four patients were allocated to the study group. Due to expanded Kerr incisions 4 patients in study group did not receive their allocated intervention. In addition, 29 patients in the study group were lost to follow up and did not come to the sixth week check up. Statistical analysis is based on data from the remaining 51 study group.
Purse string closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture
Continuously locked closure technique
Eighty four patients were allocated to the control group. Due to expanded Kerr incisions 3 patients in control group did not receive their allocated intervention. In addition, 16 patients in the control group were lost to follow up and did not come to the sixth week check up. Statistical analysis is based on data from the remaining 65 study group.
Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked suturing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Purse string closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture
Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked suturing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Term (\> 37 weeks) pregnancy
* Cervical dilatation \< 4 cm
* Kerr incision
* Age \> 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency situations (fetal distress, cord prolapse, placental abruption,severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, vasa previa )
* Having a history of uterine surgery (myomectomy, hysterotomy)other than C/S
* Extension of Kerr incision
* Multiple pregnancy
* Maternal diabetes mellitus
* Maternal connective tissue disease
* Uterine malformation
* Uterine fibroids on Kerr incision line
* Chorioamnionitis
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Cem Turan
Chief Clinical
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yasemin Karsidağ
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Turan C, Buyukbayrak EE, Yilmaz AO, Karsidag YK, Pirimoglu M. Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/jog.12593. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The video of purse string uterine closure (Turan Technique) in cesarean section
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21.01.2011-02(1)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Kartal1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.