Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.
NCT ID: NCT04799457
Last Updated: 2021-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-01
2021-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018
Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01287611
Can Cesarean Scar Defects be Prevented?
NCT06761495
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04871022
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Classical caesarean group
Care providers are applying standard caesarean procedure for participants.
No interventions assigned to this group
Study caesarean group
Care providers are applying additional sutures to standard caesarean procedure for participants.
Suture technique
We wil apply additional sutures to classical caesarean procedure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Suture technique
We wil apply additional sutures to classical caesarean procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The participants will have not any uterine contraction or cervical dilatation before delivery.
* Having no systemic or obstetric illnesses
* Participants who are accept to participate in this study with their written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having uterine contraction or cervical dilatation
* Smoking cigarettes
* Having systemic or obstetric illnesses
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ergul Demircivi Bor
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ergul Demircivi Bor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin Goztepe City Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin Goztepe City Hospital
Istanbul, Kadikoy, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bennich G, Rudnicki M, Wilken-Jensen C, Lousen T, Lassen PD, Wojdemann K. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):417-22. doi: 10.1002/uog.15792.
Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;125(3):219-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Stegwee SI, Jordans I, van der Voet LF, van de Ven PM, Ket J, Lambalk CB, de Groot C, Hehenkamp W, Huirne J. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1097-1108. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15048. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/0077
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.