Suture Material and C-Section Scar Niches: A Comparative Study

NCT ID: NCT07101952

Last Updated: 2025-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-12

Study Completion Date

2024-10-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Defective healing of the uterine wound after a Cesarean section (CS) can lead to the formation of a CS niche (CSN). The specific technique used for closure and the type of suture material chosen are often overlooked factors that might contribute to the development of these niches. This study aimed to compare how frequently CSNs occur when the CS hysterotomy is closed using barbed suture material versus conventional vicryl suture material, with assessments primarily done via transvaginal ultrasound (TVS).

The methodology involved closing the CS hysterotomy with a double-layer technique using unlocked continuous running sutures, where the first layer included the decidua and was overlapped by the second. Researchers evaluated several aspects, including the duration and feasibility of the hysterotomy closure, the grade of postoperative pain, and the length of hospital stay. Transvaginal ultrasounds were conducted monthly for three months post-operatively to monitor for CSN development and to gather descriptive measurements of any niches found. The absence of a CSN was considered an indicator of surgical success.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vicryl group

In these patients, the Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was conventional multifilament Vicryl.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multifilament vicryl suture material

Intervention Type OTHER

The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.

Barbed absorbable synthetic monofilament group

In these patients, the Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Braded Suture material

Intervention Type OTHER

The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Braded Suture material

The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.

Intervention Type OTHER

Multifilament vicryl suture material

The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients planned for CS delivery either on emergency or elective bases for singleton fetus in cephalic presentation;

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who signed the written consent to participate in the study and attend the postpartum follow-up for three months.


* Patients who had multiple pregnancy;
* Patients who had fetus in abnormal lie or presentation;
* Patients who had previous repair of CSN;
* Patients with uncontrolled DM or hypertension;
* Patients who had maintained on immunosuppressive therapies, had autoimmune disorders;
* Patients who refused to sign the written consent were excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

47 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Benha University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Basma Sakr

Assistant Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Benha university

Banhā, El Qalyoubia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC 2-11-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Niche In CEsarean Scar Trial (NICEST)
NCT05312775 RECRUITING NA