Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus

NCT ID: NCT06267495

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease. The management of young patients, diagnosed with clinically evident KC in one eye and with no clinical signs of KC in the other eye, represents a real challenge for many ophthalmologists.

The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease associated with corneal thinning and protrusion with resultant irregular astigmatism and visual loss.

Although several studies showed that epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (epi-off CXL) is more effective in preventing KC progression compared with epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the removal of corneal epithelium in epi-off CXL might be associated with a number of serious complications such as persistent epithelial defects and sight-threatening infectious keratitis. Additionally, recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that epi-on CXL is as effective as epi-off CXL in terms of visual and topographic stability of keratoconus, but has the advantage of being much safer avoiding the complications of epithelial removal.

The management of the better eye, of young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, is controversial. Some ophthalmologists prefer to cross-link the better eye, while others prefer to conservatively follow it up, in order to avoid complications of epithelial removal in epi-off CXL.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keratoconus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking group

Patients in this group underwent epithelium-on accelerated corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL) for the eye with no clinical signs of keratoconus.

Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the cornea is soaked with riboflavin for 10 minutes (Paracel® for 4 minutes and VibeX-xtra® for 6 minutes) . Thereafter, the cornea is subjected to ultraviolet A at a wavelength of 370 nm to give a total dose of 5.4 J/cm² through 10 milliwatt mW/cm² for 9 minutes.

Follow-up group

Patients in this group were planned to have regular follow-up visits, without intervention, for the eye with no clinical signs of keratoconus.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL)

In epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the cornea is soaked with riboflavin for 10 minutes (Paracel® for 4 minutes and VibeX-xtra® for 6 minutes) . Thereafter, the cornea is subjected to ultraviolet A at a wavelength of 370 nm to give a total dose of 5.4 J/cm² through 10 milliwatt mW/cm² for 9 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 12 to 30 years presented with forme fruste (FFKC) or subclinical KC, based on the following criteria:

1. Normal slit lamp examination
2. Normal topography in FFKC and suspicious topography in subclinical KC with asymmetric bow-tie or inferior steeping (inferior-superior value less than 1.40 D in the anterior sagittal curvature map in pentacam)
3. Clinical and topographic features of KC in the other eye.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 0.1 logMAR
2. Corneal thickness at the thinnest location less than 400 μm
3. Severe ocular allergy (active catarrhal keratoconjunctivitis)
4. Other corneal or ocular diseases
5. Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and autoimmune diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud Abdel-Radi

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tiba Eye Center

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Koh S, Inoue R, Maeda N, Kabata D, Shintani A, Jhanji V, Klyce SD, Maruyama K, Nishida K. Long-term Chronological Changes in Very Asymmetric Keratoconus. Cornea. 2019 May;38(5):605-611. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001890.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30702472 (View on PubMed)

Henriquez MA, Hadid M, Izquierdo L Jr. A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2020 Apr 1;36(4):270-279. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-03.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32267959 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EOCXLFE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.