Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus
NCT ID: NCT06267495
Last Updated: 2024-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-01
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Topo-Pachymetric Customized Accelerated Epi-On Vs Accelerated Epi-Off Corneal Cross Linking in Keratoconus Management
NCT06549387
Epi Off Versus Epi on Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Keratoconus Patients
NCT03598634
Efficacy and Safety ofCACXL in the Treatment of Keratoconus With Thin Corneas
NCT04504578
Study of Demarcation Line Depth in Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-off Accelerated Cross-linking (AXL) in Keratocouns
NCT04045626
Prevelance of Keratoconus
NCT04092426
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although several studies showed that epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (epi-off CXL) is more effective in preventing KC progression compared with epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the removal of corneal epithelium in epi-off CXL might be associated with a number of serious complications such as persistent epithelial defects and sight-threatening infectious keratitis. Additionally, recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that epi-on CXL is as effective as epi-off CXL in terms of visual and topographic stability of keratoconus, but has the advantage of being much safer avoiding the complications of epithelial removal.
The management of the better eye, of young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, is controversial. Some ophthalmologists prefer to cross-link the better eye, while others prefer to conservatively follow it up, in order to avoid complications of epithelial removal in epi-off CXL.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking group
Patients in this group underwent epithelium-on accelerated corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL) for the eye with no clinical signs of keratoconus.
Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL)
In epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the cornea is soaked with riboflavin for 10 minutes (Paracel® for 4 minutes and VibeX-xtra® for 6 minutes) . Thereafter, the cornea is subjected to ultraviolet A at a wavelength of 370 nm to give a total dose of 5.4 J/cm² through 10 milliwatt mW/cm² for 9 minutes.
Follow-up group
Patients in this group were planned to have regular follow-up visits, without intervention, for the eye with no clinical signs of keratoconus.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL)
In epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the cornea is soaked with riboflavin for 10 minutes (Paracel® for 4 minutes and VibeX-xtra® for 6 minutes) . Thereafter, the cornea is subjected to ultraviolet A at a wavelength of 370 nm to give a total dose of 5.4 J/cm² through 10 milliwatt mW/cm² for 9 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Normal slit lamp examination
2. Normal topography in FFKC and suspicious topography in subclinical KC with asymmetric bow-tie or inferior steeping (inferior-superior value less than 1.40 D in the anterior sagittal curvature map in pentacam)
3. Clinical and topographic features of KC in the other eye.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Corneal thickness at the thinnest location less than 400 μm
3. Severe ocular allergy (active catarrhal keratoconjunctivitis)
4. Other corneal or ocular diseases
5. Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and autoimmune diseases
12 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mahmoud Abdel-Radi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tiba Eye Center
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Koh S, Inoue R, Maeda N, Kabata D, Shintani A, Jhanji V, Klyce SD, Maruyama K, Nishida K. Long-term Chronological Changes in Very Asymmetric Keratoconus. Cornea. 2019 May;38(5):605-611. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001890.
Henriquez MA, Hadid M, Izquierdo L Jr. A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2020 Apr 1;36(4):270-279. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-03.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EOCXLFE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.