Accelerated Versus Standard CXL in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

NCT ID: NCT03791684

Last Updated: 2019-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

111 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-16

Study Completion Date

2017-06-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

WHAT WAS KNOWN

\*Standard CXL is the common procedure for treating progressive corneal ectasia. Modifications of the standard protocol were introduces to reduce its complications especially long exposure to ultraviolet rays. The Accelerated protocol, while believed to overcome this issue with comparable outcomes, has not been studied fully in patients with ectasia following corneal refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Accelerated CXL is as safe and effective as the Standard CXL in halting the progression of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty with the benefit of: reduced ultraviolet exposure, reduced operation time, and reduced patient discomfort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the Standard CXL and the AC CXL in patients with progressive corneal ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.

Setting:

Menoufia University Hospital, Egypt

Design:

Prospective, randomised comparison.

Methods:

Patients scheduled to receive either Standard CXL (3mW/cm2 for a period of 30 min) or Accelerated CXL (18mW/cm2 for a period of 5 min).The main outcomes for comparison were the change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), and the best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Refractive Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Accelerated Cross Linking

Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 18mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 5 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cross linking

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated

Standard Cross linking

Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 30 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cross linking

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cross linking

Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible patients were:
* adults aged above 18 years.
* They have been diagnosed clinically with progressive corneal ectasia following refractive surgery procedure (LASIK, PRK, ReLex smile), or penetrating keratoplasty
* CCT above 400µ.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of herpetic ocular diseases (including herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus) in the study eye
* active or recurrent ocular disease in either eye (e.g., uveitis, chronic moderate to severe blepharitis or severe dry eye) or sight-threatening diseases (e.g., previous retinal or optic nerve diseases) that would interfere with the interpretation of the study data.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Menoufia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hany Khairy

Consultant Ophthalmology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ophth001/2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Corneal Crosslinking Treatment Study
NCT04427956 COMPLETED PHASE4
McNeel Eye Center Corneal Crosslinking Study
NCT02921009 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Intacs for Keratoconus
NCT00347230 UNKNOWN NA