Accelerated Versus Standard CXL in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
NCT ID: NCT03791684
Last Updated: 2019-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
111 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-16
2017-06-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\*Standard CXL is the common procedure for treating progressive corneal ectasia. Modifications of the standard protocol were introduces to reduce its complications especially long exposure to ultraviolet rays. The Accelerated protocol, while believed to overcome this issue with comparable outcomes, has not been studied fully in patients with ectasia following corneal refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Accelerated CXL is as safe and effective as the Standard CXL in halting the progression of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty with the benefit of: reduced ultraviolet exposure, reduced operation time, and reduced patient discomfort.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Protocols
NCT05693740
Clinical and Structural Outcome of Conventional Versus Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking (CXL).
NCT02883478
Collagen Crosslinking With Ultraviolet-A in Asymmetric Corneas (2)
NCT01097447
Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus
NCT06267495
Standard Versus Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking
NCT02349165
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the Standard CXL and the AC CXL in patients with progressive corneal ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.
Setting:
Menoufia University Hospital, Egypt
Design:
Prospective, randomised comparison.
Methods:
Patients scheduled to receive either Standard CXL (3mW/cm2 for a period of 30 min) or Accelerated CXL (18mW/cm2 for a period of 5 min).The main outcomes for comparison were the change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), and the best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Accelerated Cross Linking
Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 18mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 5 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.
Cross linking
Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated
Standard Cross linking
Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 30 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.
Cross linking
Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cross linking
Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* adults aged above 18 years.
* They have been diagnosed clinically with progressive corneal ectasia following refractive surgery procedure (LASIK, PRK, ReLex smile), or penetrating keratoplasty
* CCT above 400µ.
Exclusion Criteria
* active or recurrent ocular disease in either eye (e.g., uveitis, chronic moderate to severe blepharitis or severe dry eye) or sight-threatening diseases (e.g., previous retinal or optic nerve diseases) that would interfere with the interpretation of the study data.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Menoufia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hany Khairy
Consultant Ophthalmology
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ophth001/2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.