The Effect Of High And Low Molecular Weight Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops After Crosslinking

NCT ID: NCT06243991

Last Updated: 2024-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of eye drops containing high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMW-HA) and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMW-HA) on corneal nerve regeneration, dendritic cell (DC) density, corneal sensitivity (CS), and ocular surface parameters in patients with keratoconus following corneal crosslinking (CXL).

Methods: Sixty-three eyes of 55 keratoconus patients were randomized to instill eye drops containing HMW-HA (n: 20) for 12 months, LMW-HA (n:23) for 12 months and polyvinyl alcohol (n: 20) until the epithelial defect closure in the control group after CXL. Subbasal nerve plexsus (SNP) was imaged with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and ACCMetrics program was used to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber branching density (CNBD) and corneal nerve fiber total branching density (CTBD). DC density was calculated with Image J software. CS was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive break-up time (NI-TBUT) were evaluated. All measurements were performed before CXL and postoperatively after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study assessed individuals aged 18 and above diagnosed with keratoconus and scheduled for epithelium-off CXL. A total of 63 eyes from 55 keratoconus patients were randomly assigned using computer-generated randomization (www.random.org/integers) into three groups: 20 eyes in the HMW-HA group, 23 eyes in the LMW-HA group, and 20 eyes in the control group without the administration of artificial tears.

Post-CXL, the HMW-HA group received topical HMW-HA (Comfort Shield®, i.com medical GmbH, Munich, Germany) three times daily for 12 months, the LMW-HA group received topical LMW-HA (Thealose Duo®, Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, France) three times daily for 12 months, and the control group received topical polyvinyl alcohol (Refresh, Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) three times daily until epithelial defect closure. All participants underwent accelerated epithelium-off CXL (A-CXL) for 10 minutes with 9 mW/cm² ultraviolet-A irradiation. The postoperative standard treatment regimen included topical moxifloxacin (0.5% Vigamox, Alcon Inc, USA) for one week, topical dexamethasone (0.1% Dexasine-SE, Kaysersberg Pharmaceuticals, France) for one week after epithelial closure, followed by topical loteprednol 0.5% (Lotemax, Bausch \& Lomb, USA) for three weeks.

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and manifest spherical equivalent (SE) were recorded at all visits. The assessment was carried out in the following order: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), corneal tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), corneal sensitivity, corneal fluorescein staining, and CCM imaging. Examinations were conducted preoperatively and at the postoperative 1th, 3rd, 6th and 12th months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keratoconus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Nineteen patiens (20 eyes) received topical polyvinyl alcohol (Refresh, Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) three times daily until epithelial defect closure after CXL in control group.

in vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).

Corneal Sensitivity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.

Non invasive tear break up time

Intervention Type DEVICE

Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value

Ocular Surface Disease Index Qestionnaire

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = \[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\] / \[(total number of questions answered) × 4\].

Corneal tomography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.

LMW-HA group

Twenty-two patiens (23 eyes) received topical LMW-HA (Thealose Duo®, Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, France) three times daily for 12 months.

in vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).

Corneal Sensitivity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.

Non invasive tear break up time

Intervention Type DEVICE

Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value

Ocular Surface Disease Index Qestionnaire

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = \[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\] / \[(total number of questions answered) × 4\].

Corneal tomography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.

HMW-HA group

Seventeen patiens (20 eyes) received topical HMW-HA (Comfort Shield®, i.com medical GmbH, Munich, Germany) three times daily for 12 months.

in vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).

Corneal Sensitivity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.

Non invasive tear break up time

Intervention Type DEVICE

Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value

Ocular Surface Disease Index Qestionnaire

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = \[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\] / \[(total number of questions answered) × 4\].

Corneal tomography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

in vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy

CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Corneal Sensitivity

Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Non invasive tear break up time

Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ocular Surface Disease Index Qestionnaire

The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = \[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\] / \[(total number of questions answered) × 4\].

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Corneal tomography

Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Keratoconus patiens aged 18 and above who had been scheduled for corneal crosslinking

Exclusion Criteria

* Dry eye disease, corneal thickness below 400 micrometer, pregnancy, breastfeeding, topical or systemic drug use, eye disease other than keratoconus, systemic diseases, active atopy or allergy, contact lens use, ocular surgery history.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marmara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Semra Akkaya Turhan, Assoc. prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Marmara University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marmara University

Istanbul, Pendik, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ozkan G, Turhan SA, Toker E. Effect of high and low molecular weight sodium hyaluronic acid eye drops on corneal recovery after crosslinking in keratoconus patients. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 29;10(1):e001890. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001890.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40157723 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09.2021.86

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

McNeel Eye Center Corneal Crosslinking Study
NCT02921009 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA