Efficacy of Customized Corneal Cross-linking vs. Standard Corneal Cross-linking

NCT ID: NCT04532788

Last Updated: 2024-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The standard or Dresden protocol was established in 2003 and treats the entire cornea. However, recent ultra-structural research showed that keratoconus is localized. Therefore, treating only the affected zone and minimalizing the risk of damaging surrounding tissues would be beneficial.

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the effectiveness of customized cross-linking (cCXL) is non-inferior to standard accelerated cross-linking (sCXL) in terms of flattening of the cornea and halting keratoconus progression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 2003 Wollensak et al used corneal cross-linking (CXL) in humans to halt the progression of keratoconus. During the procedure the top layer of the cornea, the epithelium, is debrided. Then the cornea is soaked with riboflavin, a photosensitizer. Hereafter a 9.0 mm diameter Ultraviolet-A (UVA) beam radiates the cornea for 30 minutes with a fluence of 3 mW/cm2 resulting in a total energy of 5,4 J/cm2. This protocol is called the Dresden protocol. Currently, accelerated versions of the Dresden protocol are used in common practice. There are different accelerated protocols with fluences of 9mW/cm2, 10mW/cm2 and 15 mW/cm2. The higher the fluence, the shorter the treatment time, however according to the Bunsen-Roscoe reciprocity law the total amount of energy stays the same.During the procedure oxygen radicals are formed that interact with the surrounding molecules, leading to the formation of new chemical bounds between the collagen fibrils (i.e. corneal crosslinks). The final goal of the procedure is to cause the cornea to stiffen and achieve flattening of the treated region.

For any treatment, it is imperative that the unaffected region of the tissue is not unnecessarily treated by an intervention or drug application. To minimalize the risk of damage to surrounding tissues it would be beneficial that the UVA beam is restricted to the affected, keratoconic zone in the patient's cornea. This can be achieved by customizing the beam shape and size in a way that only the degenerated zone is treated, i.e. by customized cross-linking (cCXL). Recently published studies provide clinical evidence that similar clinical outcomes (amount of corneal flattening) can be achieved when only the cone is treated instead of the entire cornea.They also show the potential benefits of cCXL, e.g. the treatment is patient-specific, a smaller surface of the cornea is irradiated, lower incidence of corneal haze, a faster reepithelialisation and a shorter procedure time. However, none of these studies are randomized and study results are limited by using small sample sizes. Therefore, we feel that there is a great need for a randomized controlled trial with an appropriate design and sample size to confirm these findings.

The aim of this study is to investigate if cCXL is non-inferior to sCXL (10 mW/cm2) in terms of flattening of the corneal surface and halting the disease progression.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keratoconus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Customized crosslinking

In the customized corneal cross-linking protocol (cCXL) a patient-specific treatment pattern, based on the patient's Pentacam images, will be used to treat the cornea. The CXL pattern exists out of 3 concentric circles and is centered on the cone. To estimate the cone location a combination of the thinnest corneal point, maximum anterior elevation and maximum posterior elevation is used. The epithelium is debrided with alcohol within the marked zone. After the application of riboflavin each circle receives a different amount of energy, which gradually decreases with increasing circle size.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Customized crosslinking

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the customized corneal cross-linking protocol (cCXL) a patient-specific treatment pattern, based on the patient's Pentacam images, will be used to treat the cornea. The CXL pattern exists out of 3 concentric circles and is centered on the cone. To estimate the cone location a combination of the thinnest corneal point, maximum anterior elevation and maximum posterior elevation is used. The epithelium is debrided with alcohol within the marked zone. After the application of riboflavin each circle receives a different amount of energy, which gradually decreases with increasing circle size.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Standard crosslinking

In the standard corneal cross-linking protocol (sCXL) the epithelium is debrided with alcohol over a region with a diameter of 9.0 mm. After the application of riboflavin the cornea is irradiated with UVA with a fluence of 10 mW/cm2 during 9 minutes with a diameter of 9.0 mm, resulting in a total energy of 5.4 J/cm2.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard crosslinking

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the standard corneal cross-linking protocol (sCXL) the epithelium is debrided with alcohol over a region with a diameter of 9.0 mm. After the application of riboflavin the cornea is irradiated with UVA with a fluence of 10 mW/cm2 during 9 minutes with a diameter of 9.0 mm, resulting in a total energy of 5.4 J/cm2.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Customized crosslinking

In the customized corneal cross-linking protocol (cCXL) a patient-specific treatment pattern, based on the patient's Pentacam images, will be used to treat the cornea. The CXL pattern exists out of 3 concentric circles and is centered on the cone. To estimate the cone location a combination of the thinnest corneal point, maximum anterior elevation and maximum posterior elevation is used. The epithelium is debrided with alcohol within the marked zone. After the application of riboflavin each circle receives a different amount of energy, which gradually decreases with increasing circle size.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard crosslinking

In the standard corneal cross-linking protocol (sCXL) the epithelium is debrided with alcohol over a region with a diameter of 9.0 mm. After the application of riboflavin the cornea is irradiated with UVA with a fluence of 10 mW/cm2 during 9 minutes with a diameter of 9.0 mm, resulting in a total energy of 5.4 J/cm2.

The procedure is done with the Avedro Mosaic CXL device (Avedro, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Progressive keratoconus based on an increase of maximum keratometry (Kmax) of 1 diopter (D) over a time period of 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Corneal scarring
* Corneal disease other than keratoconus
* History of corneal surgery (e.g. refractive surgery, corneal transplantation, intracorneal ring segments)
* Patient unwilling or unable to give informed consent, unwilling to accept randomization or inability to complete follow-up (e.g. hospital visits) or comply with study procedures
* Insufficient corneal thickness including epithelium \< 375 µm
* Pregnancy
* Among patients in whom both eyes are eligible only the first eye which is undergoing corneal cross-linking is enrolled in the study
* Participation in another clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

R.M.M.A. Nuijts, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Ophthalmology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+)

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vandevenne MMS, Berendschot TTJM, Winkens B, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Visser N, Dickman MM, Wisse RPL, Wijdh RHJ, Roy AS, Shetty R, Nuijts RMMA. Efficacy of customized corneal crosslinking versus standard corneal crosslinking in patients with progressive keratoconus (C-CROSS study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 May 19;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02976-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37208674 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL73003.068.20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Collagen Cross-linking in Keratoconus
NCT03760432 RECRUITING NA
German Corneal Cross Linking Register
NCT00560651 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Customized Contact Lenses
NCT05134909 UNKNOWN NA