Anticoagulation and Inflammation Monitoring in Patients After Heart and Vascular Interventions
NCT ID: NCT06222866
Last Updated: 2024-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-25
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main study questions are:
* What is the most appropriate anticoagulation monitoring tool (ACT, aPTT, viscoelastic tests (ROTEM), and anti-Xa) for UFH
* What is the incidence of adverse events associated with anticoagulation and inflammation after heart and vascular interventions
* Is there an association of available anticoagulation thresholds and monitoring tests with bleeding and/or thrombosis occurrence
* Is there an association of inflammation with delirium
Secondary study objectives include:
* Association of anticoagulation levels as measured by ACT, aPTT, viscoelastic tests (ROTEM), and anti-factor-Xa with adverse events
* Correlation of each anticoagulation monitoring test with the UFH anti-Xa measurement
* Correlation of each anticoagulation monitoring test with another (ACT, aPTT, ROTEM, anti-F-Xa) and the amount of blood loss post surgery
* The incidence of UFH-rebound effect and the need for protamine application
* Association of inflammation and increased / reduced need for anticoagulation titration
* Correlation of anticoagulation dosing with anticoagulation monitoring tests and adverse events
* The association of inflammation with adverse events
* The association and impact of inflammation on measured levels of anticoagulation with available tests
* Influence of anticoagulation on mortality
* Incidence of ECMO support
* Incidence of delirium (hypoactive and hyperactive) and correlation with vital (newly onset postoperative atrial fibrillation amongst others) and laboratory parameters, including, and pre-existing neurological disorders
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management
NCT04993170
Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management
NCT00997841
Extracorporeal Life Support and Modification of Hemostasis
NCT04912336
Biological and Clinical Relevance of Quantra Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assay in Hemorrhagic Cardiac Surgery
NCT07105904
Generation of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)-Antibodies Without Prior Heparin Exposure
NCT01102790
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients undergoing heart surgery require full heparinization before the start of the heart-lung machine, which is later reversed using protamine. The levels of anticoagulation are intraoperatively monitored with activated clotting time (ACT). In the postoperative period, the monitoring of rest-heparinization or rebound effect is further performed. In certain cases, the addition of protamine is needed, based on the available monitoring tests. The postoperative monitoring of anticoagulation is usually performed using ACT and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and may be extended by other diagnostic methods, including viscoelastic tests. Moreover, to ensure the hemostatic capacity of the patient, monitoring of other parameters (platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, prothrombin time quick assay (PT), antithrombin level, etc.) may be included. Finally, in the case of patients receiving extracorporeal life support (ECMO), continuous anticoagulation is indicated, and its monitoring is of immense importance.
Furthermore, in the case of vascular surgery, patients require unfractionated heparin (UFH) intraoperatively, including postoperative continuous infusion.
The evidence on correlation and available monitoring tools is scarce and contradictory, usually based on retrospective analyses of patients´ data from medical charts. Additionally, the role of inflammation in the development of delirium is still unclear, and this association is a subject of debate.
Well-known consequences of postoperative delirium (POD) include poor functional outcome with increased morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare costs due to institutionalization and rehospitalization. The incidence of POD after cardiac and vascular surgery remains between 13 and 52%. The current hypothesis on the pathophysiology of POD includes disruption of the blood-brain barrier allowing peripheral inflammation and mediators to cause neuro-inflammation. Neurotoxicity induced by a disbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress might explain neuronal damage and neurotransmitter disbalance responsible for POD. To improve patients´ functional outcome and the financial burden of POD there is a growing interest in identifying predictive and diagnostic (bio-)markers. The neurofilament light chain (NfL) protein has shown promising results as a potential biomarker for POD. However, the literature on cardiac and vascular patients is limited.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients after cardiovascular surgery who received anticoagulation
The investigated population comprises all patients after cardiovascular surgery who received anticoagulation. Subgroup analyses based on the level of inflammation, delirium, anticoagulation, and others will be conducted.
Anticoagulation monitoring
Evaluation of different monitoring modalities to find the most appropriate anticoagulation monitoring tool for UFH therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anticoagulation monitoring
Evaluation of different monitoring modalities to find the most appropriate anticoagulation monitoring tool for UFH therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed written consent
* Scheduled for cardiac intervention where the use of UFH is expected (elective surgery)
* Scheduled for vascular intervention when the need for perioperative anticoagulation is expected (elective surgery)
* Patients receiving ECMO support
Exclusion Criteria
* Known participation in other interventional clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University Innsbruck
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PAC-AIM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.