Fresh-Frozen Plasma Infusions to Reduce Risk of Bleeding Related to Invasive Procedures

NCT ID: NCT00233246

Last Updated: 2014-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare patients with mild to moderate prolongation of the INR test who receive FFP infusions prior to invasive hepatobiliary procedures for bleeding complications to patients who do not receive FFP infusions. Bleeding complications will be defined as meeting one or more of the following:

1. Intrahepatic hematoma greater than 1 ml/kg of patient weight as seen on post-procedure ultrasound examination performed between 4 to 30 hours after the procedure.
2. Greater than 1.6g/dL hemoglobin decline measured within 4 to 30 hours post-procedure compared with the pre-procedure value, in the absence of another identified bleeding source to account for the hemoglobin drop.
3. Need for transfusion of packed red blood cells for procedure-related bleeding while in the study.

The secondary endpoints of this study will be: 1) The need to perform subsequent procedures (angiography, embolization, additional imaging study including computerized tomography (CT) scan, surgery) to diagnose or to arrest procedure-related bleeding OR the need for subsequent medical therapies (FFP, coagulation factor concentrates, anti-fibrinolytics) to treat procedure-related bleeding between time of procedure and the end of patient's time in the study. If necessary, the relationship of procedure or therapy to procedure-related bleeding will be assessed by an adjudication panel; 2) The predictive value of INR; 3) The effect of study treatment on change in INR; 4) The cost of preventing one bleed; 5) The predictors of bleeding other than INR; 6) The number of transfusion-associated adverse events encountered to prevent one bleed; and 7) The effect of treatment on bleeding grade.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

It is important to determine whether or not prophylactic FFP is necessary for patients with mild to moderate elevation of the INR who require an invasive procedure. It is also important to establish whether routine pre-procedure coagulation tests are predictive of bleeding outcomes at the time of a significant invasive procedure. Although prophylactic FFP is often given to such patients before invasive procedures, there is little evidence to show that pre-procedure INR in this range is predictive of procedure-related bleeding or that prophylactic FFP reduces this risk.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

After obtaining consent and verifying eligibility requirements, the study staff will randomize the patient to one of two treatment groups. One group will receive a prophylactic FFP infusion before the hepatobiliary procedure. The other group will not receive prophylactic FFP.

The dose of FFP will be approximately 10 ml/kg. The dose of FFP for each patient will be determined in one of two ways in accordance with local policies: 1) rounding to the nearest integer number of units (Method 1); or 2) using split units (Method 2). The method chosen may vary between patients (e.g., a physician might decide to dose adult patients by rounding to the nearest integer number of units and to dose pediatric patients using split units).

Method 1: The dose of FFP will be the number of units that comes closest to a dose of 10 ml/kg, determined as follows: nearest integer to (10 x weight in kg)/200. Decimals .5 and higher should be rounded up to the next integer. Decimals less than .5 should be rounded down (e.g., a 70 kg patient would receive 4 units, while a 69 kg patient would receive 3 units).

Method 2: The dose of FFP will be chosen in order to come as close as possible to a dose of 10 ml/kg, and can contain either full units, split units, or a combination thereof.

After the FFP infusion (if any) and within 2 hours prior to the hepatobiliary procedure, blood will be drawn for laboratory tests and for the repository. Although Study of Hemostasis and Invasive Procedures (SHIP) will not be a truly blinded study, the clinicians performing the hepatobiliary procedure and the radiology team performing the post-procedure ultrasound will not be told whether the participant received prophylactic FFP. They will also not know the results of the immediate pre-procedure Prethrombin Time (PT)/INR and Partial Thomboplastin Time (PTT) tests.

Participants in the study may not be treated with any other systemic hemostatic agents prior to the procedure. Local hemostatic treatments may be used during the procedure, according to standard practice. The invasive hepatobiliary procedure techniques, all other concomitant treatments and interventions, and all post-procedure treatments and interventions are at the discretion of the treating physicians. Participants will be followed for clinical evidence of bleeding and will be treated as needed for any bleeding that may occur.

Repository samples will only be used for genetic and protein tests of hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.

SHIP is designed as a one-sided non-inferiority study. The null hypothesis is that the proportion of patients not given prophylactic FFP who meet the criteria for the bleeding endpoint is at least .04 higher than the proportion of patients given prophylactic FFP who meet the criteria for the bleeding endpoint. The goal of this study is to determine whether there is strong evidence that the difference between the two treatment plans is not that large.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Coagulation Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FFP Infusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing one of the following percutaneous abdominal or transjugular invasive procedures: liver biopsy; liver-biliary abscess drainage; biliary tree drainage; or radio-frequency ablation of hepatic tumor
* Platelet count greater than or equal to 70,000/microliter
* INR greater than or equal to 1.3 and less than or equal to 1.9 (must not be based on a sample drawn within 24 hours of any prior FFP treatment)
* A PTT less than or equal to 50 sec

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of warfarin, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, or other anticoagulant therapy within 5 days of the planned procedure (exceptions: prophylactic heparin injections into central venous catheters for catheter maintenance, prophylactic heparin (standard or low-dose) for prevention of deep venous thrombosis, and/or aspirin)
* History of severe allergic reaction to plasma products
* Use of any of the following second-generation anti-platelet agents: abciximab, tirofiban, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine
* Currently receiving any dialysis
* History of clinically significant bleeding diathesis, including Hemophilia A or B, von Willebrand's Disease, or congenital Factor VII deficiency
* Known history of a coagulation-factor inhibitor within the month prior to the procedure (In the absence of a known history, testing is not required)
* Active major bleeding; bleeding from gastrointestinal, pulmonary, mouth/throat, genito-urinary tract, or central nervous system sites (excludes guaiac positive stool sample without gross blood or melena, minor epistaxis, minor gum bleeding, microscopic hematuria, superficial bruises, normal menses, or minor vaginal spotting)
* Pediatric patients requiring sedation in order to undergo a post-procedure ultrasound examination
* Already received FFP in the 24 hours before the planned invasive procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Research Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susan Assmann, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New England Research Institutes, Inc.

Mark Brecher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina Hospital

George Buchanan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas SW Medical Center

James Bussel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

John Hess, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Christopher D. Hillyer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Barbara Konkle, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

David Kuter, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Jeffrey McCullough, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Janice McFarland, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Blood Center of SE Wisconsin

Paul Ness, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Thomas Ortel, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Sherrill J. Slichter, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Puget Sound Blood Center Div of Research

Ronald Strauss, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Darrell Triulzi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside Hospital

James R. Stubbs, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina Hospital

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Texas SW Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Puget Sound Blood Center Div of Research

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Blood Center of SE Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01HL072299

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072028

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072072

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072191

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072196

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072248

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072289

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072290

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072291

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072305

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072331

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072346

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072355

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072359

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HL072283

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

326

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in Hip Arthroscopy
NCT05710146 WITHDRAWN PHASE3
Fibrinogen in Liver Transplant
NCT07265843 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4
Fibrinogen in Liver Transplant Subjects
NCT06764927 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4