Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management

NCT ID: NCT04993170

Last Updated: 2025-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

5004 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-23

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With the help of a standardized questionnaire, an increased risk of bleeding due to pre-existing hemostasis disorders in the site-specific patient population will be detected and the corresponding enhanced diagnostic measures will be initiated. The planned prospective observational study should i.) systematically investigate the results of this procedure and ii.) allow a comparison with a retrospective perioperative cohort that was cared for at the Benjamin Franklin Campus before the introduction of the questionnaire. Due to the campus structure with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department, a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is to be expected.

In the following, the feasibility of the required measures in clinical routine (measured by the frequency of actual changes or modifications of the initially planned perioperative procedure, the adequate implementation of indicated diagnostic measures, etc.) will be examined.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is the systematic scientific evaluation of a standardized questionnaire for bleeding history already used in clinical routine during the preoperative anesthesiological visit and its impact on perioperative coagulation management.

The routine use of a standardized questionnaire to assess bleeding risk is based on a study on the preoperative identification of patients with (primary) hemostasis disorders from 2007: in a patient collective of 5649 patients from different disciplines at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a positive predictive value of 99% for the presence of a hemostasis disorder could be established if at least four questions of a standardized bleeding history questionnaire were answered positively. This is not possible in the same way with the plasmatic coagulation-global tests established in clinical routine.

The standardized application of the questionnaire serves to identify patients at risk of bleeding at an early stage and to adapt and optimize perioperative coagulation management accordingly by initiating targeted diagnostics and therapy. However, a systematic scientific evaluation of this questionnaire with regard to the conditions at the Benjamin Franklin Campus with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department and a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is still pending.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perioperative Hemorrhage Hemostasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bleeding assessment tool

The standardized application of the questionnaire serves to identify patients at risk of bleeding at an early stage and to adapt and optimize perioperative coagulation management accordingly by initiating targeted diagnostics and therapy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients of both genders undergoing elective surgery at the Benjamin Franklin campus in the 12-month period

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, lactation
* Patients not capable of giving consent
* Already diagnosed hemostasis disorder
* Patients under (plasmatic) anticoagulation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute for biometry and clinical epidemiology, Charité University Berlin, Germany

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute for transfusion medicine, Charité University Berlin, Germany

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Einstein center digital future

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sascha Treskatsch

Univ.-Prof. Dr. med., Head of Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EA4/181/20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.